Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Simon Rushall

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Simon Rushall

  • Postcode verified

    DH1 5UL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+1Mixedmore positive than 25% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelystrengthtimelyconsistentlyimprovedsafeclearly
Criticismat risktoo manylackingnot consistentlyharmyet tovariablenot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings578w+46
  • What needs to improve150w−59

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
728
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 28, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 21%

Full report text

Mr David Williams Corporate Director for Children and Young People’s Services Durham County Council County Hall Durham DH1 5UL

p.1

arrangements within Durham County Council children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Durham County Council which was conducted on 8 and 9 February 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Durham County Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Durham County Council children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Durham County Council children’s services

The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in March 2010 have been addressed.

p.1

arrangements within Durham County Council children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Social workers in the children with disability team use a range of effective approaches to ensure that the views of children and young people, including those unable to express themselves verbally, inform assessments and planning. Their assessments and plans are holistic with very good analysis of the needs of the child, parents, carers and other family members, and result in Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

Strengths

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk effective services.

p.1

following areas

ƒ Children suffering or at risk of harm receive a timely and effective service to ensure their safety. Section 47 enquiries are thorough and carried out by suitably qualified and experienced social workers.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The emergency duty team provides a comprehensive service that links effectively with day services to ensure that children are safe and their needs met.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Thresholds for referrals are understood and applied by partner agencies and the initial response team. Referrals seen by inspectors have received a timely response resulting in appropriate action being taken.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Operational partnerships, particularly with police and health providers, are well-developed with effective collaboration and constructive challenge to ensure children’s safety.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Use of the common assessment framework is consistently applied across the partnership and effectively supports the delivery of appropriate early intervention services to children, young people and their families.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Cases seen by inspectors indicate that children are routinely seen and spoken to in the assessment process.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Assessment records in most cases seen by inspectors are up-to-date with management decisions clearly recorded.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Audit systems and processes enable managers to review practice and records but the impact of this on service improvement has yet to be fully realised.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff workloads are manageable and balanced and no unallocated work was seen.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff receive regular critically reflective supervision and report that managers at all levels are approachable and accessible for formal and informal guidance. The authority provides a programme of relevant training and development opportunities that meets a wide range of developmental needs, especially for newly qualified social workers.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ The electronic social care record has been improved and now allows managers better oversight of individual casework. However, there remain limitations that do not prevent inaccurate entry of assessment dates and require some duplication of recording.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Not all decisions to close contacts with no further action are seen and agreed by a manager.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ The quality of assessments is too variable. While some good examples were seen, too many are descriptive and lacking in analysis. The views of parents and extended family members are not consistently recorded. While in most cases seen ethnicity was recorded, in too many cases the wider impact of equality and diversity issues were not explored or applied effectively.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: George Garlick, Chief Executive, Durham County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion