Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Simon Rushall
- Postcode verified
DH1 5UL
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, there remain limitations that do not prevent inaccurate entry of assessment dates and require some duplication of recording. p.2
- While some good examples were seen, too many are descriptive and lacking in analysis. p.3
- The views of parents and extended family members are not consistently recorded. p.3
- While in most cases seen ethnicity was recorded, in too many cases the wider impact of equality and diversity issues were not explored or applied effectively. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: George Garlick, Chief Executive, Durham County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 728
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 28, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr David Williams Corporate Director for Children and Young People’s Services Durham County Council County Hall Durham DH1 5UL
p.1
arrangements within Durham County Council children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Durham County Council which was conducted on 8 and 9 February 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Durham County Council children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within Durham County Council children’s services
The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Durham County Council children’s services
The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in March 2010 have been addressed.
p.1
arrangements within Durham County Council children’s services
From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
Social workers in the children with disability team use a range of effective approaches to ensure that the views of children and young people, including those unable to express themselves verbally, inform assessments and planning. Their assessments and plans are holistic with very good analysis of the needs of the child, parents, carers and other family members, and result in Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
Strengths
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk effective services.
p.1
following areas
Children suffering or at risk of harm receive a timely and effective service to ensure their safety. Section 47 enquiries are thorough and carried out by suitably qualified and experienced social workers.
p.2
following areas
The emergency duty team provides a comprehensive service that links effectively with day services to ensure that children are safe and their needs met.
p.2
following areas
Thresholds for referrals are understood and applied by partner agencies and the initial response team. Referrals seen by inspectors have received a timely response resulting in appropriate action being taken.
p.2
following areas
Operational partnerships, particularly with police and health providers, are well-developed with effective collaboration and constructive challenge to ensure children’s safety.
p.2
following areas
Use of the common assessment framework is consistently applied across the partnership and effectively supports the delivery of appropriate early intervention services to children, young people and their families.
p.2
following areas
Cases seen by inspectors indicate that children are routinely seen and spoken to in the assessment process.
p.2
following areas
Assessment records in most cases seen by inspectors are up-to-date with management decisions clearly recorded.
p.2
following areas
Audit systems and processes enable managers to review practice and records but the impact of this on service improvement has yet to be fully realised.
p.2
following areas
Staff workloads are manageable and balanced and no unallocated work was seen.
p.2
following areas
Staff receive regular critically reflective supervision and report that managers at all levels are approachable and accessible for formal and informal guidance. The authority provides a programme of relevant training and development opportunities that meets a wide range of developmental needs, especially for newly qualified social workers.
p.2
Areas for development
The electronic social care record has been improved and now allows managers better oversight of individual casework. However, there remain limitations that do not prevent inaccurate entry of assessment dates and require some duplication of recording.
p.2
Areas for development
Not all decisions to close contacts with no further action are seen and agreed by a manager.
p.2
Areas for development
The quality of assessments is too variable. While some good examples were seen, too many are descriptive and lacking in analysis. The views of parents and extended family members are not consistently recorded. While in most cases seen ethnicity was recorded, in too many cases the wider impact of equality and diversity issues were not explored or applied effectively.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: George Garlick, Chief Executive, Durham County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion