Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Martin Ayres

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Martin Ayres

  • Postcode verified

    NE8 1HH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivetimelyclearskilledstrengthseffectively
Criticismat riskinsufficientharmbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings624w+31
  • What needs to improve156w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
780
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 26, typical 45
Average sentence
25 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Mrs Margaret Whellans Group Director of Learning and Children’s Services Gateshead Council Civic Centre Gateshead NE8 1HH

p.1

assessment arrangements within Gateshead children’s services

This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council which was conducted on 16 and 17 March 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Gateshead children’s services

The inspection identified no areas for priority action but some areas for development, which are detailed below.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Gateshead children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Gateshead children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:

p.1

assessment arrangements within Gateshead children’s services

ƒ Contacts in respect of children in need or those considered to be at risk of harm are prioritised within an agreed multi-agency framework. The system for screening contacts by duty social workers and managers leads to clear and timely decisions and action. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ All cases are allocated to ensure that initial and core assessments and investigations in accordance with section 47 Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) are undertaken in a timely manner by suitably qualified social workers.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Gateshead children’s services

ƒ Social workers receive regular supervision and support from their managers who maintain an effective day to day overview of incoming contacts and subsequent action.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Gateshead children’s services

ƒ The duty and assessment workforce is stable with minimal reliance on the use of agency staff. Staff value being members of a cohesive duty and assessment team.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Gateshead children’s services

ƒ Most children and young people are routinely seen alone during assessments and investigations in accordance with section 47 CA1989 and their views are appropriately considered in care planning.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Gateshead children’s services

ƒ Up to date policy and operational procedures provide clear guidance to staff and effective working protocols exist between the assessment and duty team, the children with disabilities team, and the out of hours service.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Gateshead children’s services

ƒ The out of hours service provides emergency and generic coverage by experienced and skilled practitioners and is suitably integrated with the day duty and assessment services, the police and health provision.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Gateshead children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:

p.2

Strengths

ƒ A caseload weighting system ensures a balanced and fair distribution of work within the team. Screening and ‘signs of safety’ tools are used well by managers working alongside social workers to prioritise further action.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Managers of the duty and assessment team are highly visible and active in monitoring and managing effectively incoming work, fluctuating service pressures, and outcomes. Allocation processes are openly managed and lead to increased team ownership and shared knowledge of complex cases.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Duty social workers utilise direct work tools and methods well to engage children and young people in their assessments and plans.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The provision of a wide range of family support and preventative services reduces the need for higher level interventions in cases that can be supported through the use of the common assessment framework, ‘Team-around-the Family’, children’s centres and specialist support provision.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ The recording of culture, religion, linguistic needs and disability is not fully evidenced in every case and given due weight in the formulation of individual plans.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Audit systems which are currently available in the borough are not being fully utilised to assure routinely the quality and consistency of assessments or to monitor jointly agreed levels of intervention based on the application of the safety plan tool.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The integrated recording system does not provide a coherent and accessible audit trail of decisions in all cases to enable managers to track and monitor the progress of work at every stage, including out of hours.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Typing pool capacity is insufficient in ensuring the timely recording of the assessments which have been undertaken by social workers.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Roger Kelly, Chief Executive, Gateshead Paul Moffat, Chair of Gateshead Safeguarding Children Board Catherine Donovan, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Gateshead Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion