Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    SE18 6DF

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelystrengthseffectiveimprovedimprovingtimely
Criticismnot consistentlyinconsistentnot alwaysbelownot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings485w+71
  • What needs to improve141w−71

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
626
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 22, typical 45
Average sentence
27 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%What needs to improve 23%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6666 Direct F 020-7421-5646 sue.leaver@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms Gillian Palmer Director of Children’s Services London Borough of Greenwich Riverside House West Woolwich High Street London SE18 6DF

p.1

Greenwich children’s services

This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the London Borough of Greenwich which was conducted on 21 and 22 July 2009. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year.

p.1

Greenwich children’s services

The inspection identified no areas for priority action but some areas for development, which are detailed below.

p.1

Greenwich children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: 45 electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.

p.1

Greenwich children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular: ƒ National performance indicators show an improving service, in particular the timeliness of core assessments, the decrease in the percentage of repeat referrals and the decrease in the number of referrals to children’s social care.

p.1

Greenwich children’s services

ƒ Decisions are made in accordance with statutory timescales. Children’s needs are effectively prioritised at an early stage.

p.2

Greenwich children’s services

ƒ Children’s ethnic, cultural, linguistic and religious needs are identified at an early stage and are taken into account in assessments.

p.2

Greenwich children’s services

ƒ Children and family members are regularly involved in the assessment and planning to meet children’s needs.

p.2

Greenwich children’s services

ƒ The service is sufficiently resourced to meet the identified needs of children and their families.

p.2

Greenwich children’s services

ƒ The out-of-hours service has suitable staff who communicate well with the day time duty system

p.2

Greenwich children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The area is working well to ensure multi-agency working is appropriately focused and effective in supporting children and their families. ƒ Child protection enquiries are thorough and timely and are carried out by well trained competent social workers. ƒ The common assessment framework is used effectively to ensure children and families receive early intervention when appropriate. ƒ Files are regularly audited by senior managers. ƒ Children and family members have effectively influenced the development of service delivery and as a result improved contact and waiting facilities have been introduced.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Record keeping is inconsistent: all file records are not up-to-date, each child in the same family does not have a separate record and a chronology is not available on files of all children in need cases. ƒ The supervision arrangements for social work staff is not of a consistently high standard. ƒ Initial assessments are not used consistently to determine whether a referred child is a child in need, as advised in ‘Working Together to Safeguard Children’. Management information reports on the timescales for initial assessments used within the service are not always consistent with national guidance.

p.2

Areas for development

Heather Brown Divisional Manager, Social Care Safeguarding

p.3

Areas for development

Copy: Mary Ney, Chief Executive, London Borough of Greenwich Gillian Palmer, Chair of Greenwich Safeguarding Children Board Jackie Smith, Lead Member for children’s services, London Borough of Greenwich Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion