Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 733
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 30, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Gerald Meehan Strategic Director for Children and Young People Halton Borough Council Municipal Building Kingsway Widnes Cheshire WA8 7QF
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Children’s services in Halton Borough Council perform well.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
A greater proportion of primary provision is better than in similar areas and the national average although there is more variable performance in childcare, nursery provision, secondary schools and school sixth forms. Nursery provision performs above the national average and childminders performance is better than in similar areas. However, in non-domestic child care settings, secondary schools and school sixth forms there is too much provision that is only satisfactory and performance is lower than in similar areas and seen nationally. Only half of secondary schools and school sixth forms are good or better. Further education which was judged to be inadequate is now making good progress. Provision for children and young people whose circumstances make them vulnerable is good overall. The joint area review in July 2008 judged safeguarding to be outstanding and provision for looked after children to be good. All special schools in the borough are outstanding or good, the
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
two pupil referral units are good and two of the three children’s homes are good and perform better than similar areas and the national average. The local authority fostering and adoption agencies provide good services in line with or above similar areas. Judgements for all Every Child Matters outcomes are good or better in a large majority of settings, although performance is less consistent in the area of achieving economic well-being.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
The local authority performs well against the national indicators with the very large majority for staying safe and enjoying and achieving in line with or above national averages. The performance of children and young people whose circumstances make them vulnerable is in line or better than similar areas and that found nationally. Gaps in educational achievement for these children in comparison to others of the same age are narrower than elsewhere nationally. For example, there is good achievement at Key Stages 2 and for all pupils including those with special educational needs, looked after children and those from minority ethnic backgrounds. However, the participation of young people staying on in education at the age of 17 has reduced over time and there has been a considerable increase in the number of young people not in education, employment or training. The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.3
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion