Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Local authority data pack

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 3
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    −11Mixedmore positive than 40% of reports of this type

    In line with other reports of this type.

    Praiseoutstandingstrongvery highsafeimprovedclearimproving
    Criticismpoorlyweaknessweaknessesgapsexclusionsbelow

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    Findings positive critical

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No next steps set out.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    3
    Words of findings
    848
    shorter than usual (typical 3558)
    Reading level
    Hard
    Flesch 33, typical 50
    Average sentence
    21 words
    Next steps
    0
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    7%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 100%

    Full report text

    Mr Andrew Christie Director of Children's Services London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Town Hall King Street Hammersmith London W6 9JU

    p.1

    Children’s services annual rating

    Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).

    p.1

    Children’s services annual rating

    In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.

    p.1

    Children’s services annual rating

    The annual rating derives from a four point scale:

    p.1

    Children’s services annual rating

    4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements

    p.1

    Children’s services annual rating

    Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk

    p.1

    Children’s services rating Performs well (3)

    Children’s services in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham perform well.

    p.2

    Children’s services rating Performs well (3)

    The overall effectiveness of the large majority of inspected services and settings is good or better. Achievement that is in line with similar authorities and that found nationally at Key Stage 2 rises to well above both at Key Stage 4. Pupils from minority ethnic groups do well at both key stages. Increasing numbers of young people remain in education, employment or training. Achievement of a level 2 qualification has improved to above that of similar areas although in line with the national average. Level 3 qualifications are well above national and similar area averages. Most secondary schools are good or better, as are the large majority of primary schools, although there is a small amount of provision that is only satisfactory in both and one primary school requires special measures. However, despite strong provision, the rate of permanent exclusions from school is very high. One sixth form school is outstanding and the other two are good. The general

    p.2

    Children’s services rating Performs well (3)

    further education and tertiary provider is good. Provision for children whose circumstances make them vulnerable is mostly good. One special school is outstanding and the other four are good, showing performance above similar areas and that found nationally. However, while one pupil referral unit is good the other is only satisfactory, partly from a weakness in achieving economic well-being. The proportion of young offenders in suitable education, employment or training is much higher than in similar authorities and that seen nationally.

    p.2

    Children’s services rating Performs well (3)

    Young children get a good start. Achievement in the Early Years Foundation Stage is in line with the national average, improving, and above similar areas. Most nurseries and the large majority of childcare settings are at least good, showing performance above similar areas and that found nationally. The performance of childminders is below the national average although above similar areas, partly because of weaknesses in being healthy and staying safe. Looked after children achieve as well as their peers nationally and in similar areas at Key Stage 2. Both children’s homes are good but the fostering agency is only satisfactory, due partly to a weakness in staying safe. The joint area review in 2008, judged safeguarding to be adequate and the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements found no areas for priority action.

    p.2

    Children’s services rating Performs well (3)

    Performance against the very large majority of national indicators, including those for staying safe and enjoying and achieving, is at least in line with similar areas and broadly in line with or better than the national figure, although there are weaknesses in four out of the five Every Child Matters outcomes. The difference in the performance of children and young people whose circumstances make them vulnerable and others of the same age compares favourably with national figures, but less favourably against figures for similar areas. Some gaps are closing, most noticeably for pupils eligible for free school meals. The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and

    p.2

    Children’s services rating Performs well (3)

    therefore to the score for each local authority overall.

    p.3

    Children’s services rating Performs well (3)

    Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA

    p.3

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion