Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen Hunt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen Hunt

  • Postcode verified

    W6 9JU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlytimelystrengthpromptly
Criticismnot alwaysinsufficientlynot yetnot clearnot robustnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings436w+85
  • What needs to improve151w−73

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
587
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 29, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%What needs to improve 26%

Full report text

Mr Andrew Christie Director of Children’s Services London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Town Hall King Street London W6 9JU

p.1

arrangements within Hammersmith and Fulham children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Council which was conducted on 14 and 15 September 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Hammersmith and Fulham children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Hammersmith and Fulham children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Hammersmith and Fulham children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Staff report that they benefit from high levels of professional support from managers and colleagues including an appropriate range of developmental opportunities. Staff morale is high.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Good use of resources which respond flexibly to changes in demand. The effective deployment of staff demonstrates good forward planning. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ Success in the recruitment and retention of staff through creative and effective strategic planning.

p.1

following areas

ƒ Child protection procedures comply with statutory requirements. They are understood and applied by staff consistently with effective management oversight.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Workloads are manageable and cases are allocated promptly to enable timely safeguarding of children and young people.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Attention to the relevance of diversity issues is well established in practice and procedures.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Assessments are thorough and lead to evidence based judgements with effective planning. Risk and protective factors that impact on a child’s safety are assessed consistently.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The views of children and their families are consistently taken into account in the assessment and planning of their cases.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Section 47 enquiries are comprehensive and timely and lead to appropriate safeguarding actions.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Out-of-hours duty arrangements demonstrate effective responses and timely referral to the contact and assessment service.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ In some cases examined the reason for undertaking a core assessment is not always clear.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ The process to ensure Criminal Record Bureau (CRB) checks for staff are consistently up-to-date is insufficiently clear and robust.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Arrangements for routine case file audit and quality assurance by managers are not yet fully established.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Systems for obtaining the views of service users to influence service delivery remain underdeveloped. ƒ The common assessment framework used in the family support teams, is not linked effectively with the contact, referral and assessment service. Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.2

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Geoff Alltimes, Chief Executive, London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Russell Waite, Chair of Hammersmith and Fulham Safeguarding Children Board Helen Binmore, Lead Member for Children’s Services, London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion