Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    Haringey Youth Service Report

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−46Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisepositiveimprovedhigh qualityeffectivewell-plannedstrongrobustconsistently
Criticisminadequatepoorlackinsufficientweakweaknessesnot yetfailure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2110w−48
  • What needs to improve150w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,242
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 93%What needs to improve 7%

Full report text

Haringey Youth Service Report Haringey Council Children’s Services Authority Area

p.1

Publication Type Published Reference no. All 10 October 2006 309 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.1

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the local authority or at www.ofsted.gov.uk Haringey Youth Service 1

p.2

Part C: Commentary on the Key Aspects

Key Aspect 1: Standards of young people’s achievements and the quality of youth work practice 4

p.3

Part C: Commentary on the Key Aspects

Key Aspect 2: Quality of curriculum and resources 5

p.3

Part C: Commentary on the Key Aspects

Key Aspect 3: Leadership and management 6 Haringey Youth Service 2

p.3

Introduction

1. The population in Haringey is 224,300 with approximately 75% of children and young people being of minority ethnic origin. Around 19,100 young people are aged 13 to 19. Haringey Youth Service has from April 2006 been managed within the School Standards and Inclusion division of the Children’s Services Directorate. The service has an interim management team, recently strengthened by the recruitment of a head of service and training manager, due to come into post in summer 2006. There are 9 full-time youth workers posts, 5 full-time managers making up the current interim management team and 2.5 full-time equivalent administrative posts. The service employs 47 part time workers on permanent or fixed term contracts, making 13.5 full time equivalent posts. Large numbers of volunteers are deployed widely. At the time of this inspection, one of the authority’s three youth centres was partially closed for major refurbishment. A purpose-built centre for Duke of

p.4

Introduction

Edinburgh’s Award training has recently been opened. Youth work is delivered from the remaining two centres and up to 14 other sites during term time, rising to nearly 30 venues in the school holidays. The service’s total budget for 2006-2007 is £1,815,472, representing 1.3% of the education budget.

p.4

Introduction

2. The joint area review (JAR) carried out in Haringey was enhanced to enable coverage of the youth service. Inspectors took the service’s self-assessment into account and met with a cross section of young people, managers, staff and partners. They reviewed key service documentation and carried out direct observation of a sample of youth work sessions including some serving the West Green and Northumberland Park areas selected for the JAR neighbourhood study.

p.4

Main findings

3. The service is inadequate and provides unsatisfactory value for money. Young people’s achievements and the quality of youth work practice are, on the whole, unsatisfactory, although there are some good opportunities in project work through which some young people gain recognition and accreditation for personal development. Weak leadership over time, together with too little involvement of young people in managing the service, a lack of rigorous quality assurance and poor implementation of the curriculum framework, have had an adverse effect on standards. The range of provision is unsatisfactory. However, closely targeted partnership work provides an appropriate programme of purposeful activities to enable young people to make a positive contribution in the community. A legacy of failure to collect and manage data prevents the service from measuring its effectiveness. In practice the number of young people benefiting is not known.

p.4

Main findings

Elected members and senior managers recognise the weaknesses of the service and have put funding in place to support improvement. Robust action has been taken Haringey Youth Service 3

p.4

Main findings

and significant changes made in key areas including management structure, the youth work curriculum, recruitment and investment in premises. It is however too soon to see the impact of these changes. Staff work hard to maintain good relations with young people during the current period of transition.

p.5

Strengths

ƒ Young people achieve well in project work.

p.5

Strengths

ƒ Opportunities for accreditation and recognition of personal development are accessible to young people of all abilities.

p.5

Strengths

ƒ Partnerships are well targeted to enable young people to make a positive contribution in the community.

p.5

Areas for development

ƒ Improve the quality of youth work practice and, consequently, achievement.

p.5

Areas for development

ƒ Improve the extent of the involvement of young people in managing, planning and evaluating youth work.

p.5

Areas for development

ƒ Extend the range of youth work activity.

p.5

Areas for development

ƒ Take urgent steps to improve management information in order that the effectiveness of the service can begin to be measured.

p.5

Areas for development

ƒ Monitor and quality assure youth work rigorously.

p.5

Key aspect inspection grades

Standards of young people’s achievement 1 1

p.5

Key aspect inspection grades

3 Strategic and operational leadership and management

p.5

Key aspect inspection grades

The table above shows overall grades about provision. Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale: Grade 4 : A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users. Grade 3 : A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users. Grade 2 : A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users. Grade 1 : A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users. Haringey Youth Service 4

p.5

Child Matters outcomes

4. Youth workers and their local partners’ contribution to the every child matters outcomes for young people is satisfactory overall, but historic inadequate leadership and management of the service detract from the full impact and range of this work. Effective recruitment procedures, including procedures for vetting volunteers, and risk assessment of activities and premises provide a safe environment. There are very good opportunities for a few young people to acquire high level skills in project work. Young people of all abilities can gain accreditation which they regard as useful to their future career prospects, although not enough young people take up these opportunities. Effective partnerships encourage many young people, including the most disadvantaged, to take part in wider community events such as the carnival. The well-targeted holiday programme contributes to reducing antisocial behaviour.

p.6

Child Matters outcomes

Healthy outcomes are adequately supported through indoor and outdoor activities and an accessible youth counselling service. However, insufficient focus on health issues and weaknesses in delivering the curriculum limit young people’s development in understanding healthy lifestyles.

p.6

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

Key Aspect 1: Standards of young people’s achievements and the quality of youth work practice

p.6

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

5. The standards of young people’s achievements are inadequate. Observations of a sample of work found only a few good examples. All of these were in well-planned specific interest projects, such a dance group preparing for the carnival and the Exposure group in which young people acquire print and visual media production skills suitable for the competitive media industry. Young people participating in Leaders in Training rapidly develop their political understanding, putting forward themes such as racism and violence for their campaigns. In all these instances, personal development is marked; young people are self confident and pleased with their achievement. Recognition through accreditation is an integral part of project work, which is greatly valued by participants, although few are yet involved.

p.6

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

6. Youth participation in the wider community and social and political development has been given satisfactory support through partnership working. Young people’s views have been sought on aspects of the reorganisation of children and young people’s services. The youth service is energetically leading the formation of a borough wide youth council, providing an improved forum for young people’s personal and social development.

p.6

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

7. Apart from projects and partnership work, achievement was found to be at best satisfactory but the majority was inadequate. Invariably, this was linked to poor youth work practice: overall, youth work practice is inadequate. Leadership in supporting and guiding young people is weak and lacks challenge. Workers are not Haringey Youth Service 5

p.6

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

adept at planning sessions that combine learning with enjoyment or which develop topical issues within sessions. Consequently, sessions are mainly recreational in nature and lack continuity for purposeful and progressive activities. The good relationships exhibited between staff and young people are positive foundations but are not built upon effectively. Workers do not fully understand the informal learning model at the heart of the curriculum and miss many opportunities to develop important topics like healthy eating or understanding of local democracy as they arise.

p.7

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

8. Youth workers do not demonstrate high enough expectations of what young people can achieve. Their planning is cursory with no clear links to outcomes. They are not yet able to draw upon a wide enough range of methods in engaging young people or fluent in using the new curriculum documentation designed to assist them in planning. Training to support staff in developing these vital aspects of practice has been lacking. Key Aspect 2: Quality of curriculum and resources

p.7

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

9. The quality of the curriculum and resources is inadequate and the range of youth provision unsatisfactory. Although local authority facilities are well spread geographically and partnerships with voluntary organisations increase the range, there is insufficient access to high quality generic work. In addition, there is no routine outreach work and the mobile facility is not yet fully in action. Moreover, detached workers have been diverted to cover sessional duties.

p.7

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

10. Considerable investment has been made in the refurbishment of one of the three local authority youth centres on the east side of the borough. The temporary disruption has exacerbated matters, presenting voluntary partners, who formerly held activities there, with particular difficulties in continuity. Activities, including integrated provision for young people with learning difficulties and disabilities have been dispersed. This period of uncertainty, although necessary to achieve improved facilities, is impacting adversely on the progress of group members, and is set to continue at least into the summer period 2006. It is notable that the new centre has been designed to high standards, compliant with the Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001 and aims to include up to date health, drama and media resources.

p.7

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

11. Further investment has been secured recently to open a modern Duke of Edinburgh’s Award training centre. Plans are being implemented to increase the reach of the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme in partnership with a wide proportion of schools. In this and other measures planned to increase access to formal accreditation throughout the curriculum, the needs of young people of all abilities are well considered. Recognition is offered through a range of ASDAN, Millennium Volunteer awards and local awards such as peer mentoring and Exposure media accreditation. Haringey Youth Service 6

p.7

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

12. Premises across the borough vary in quality and accessibility. The two local authority centres still in use are satisfactory, safe and secure. Most shared community facilities present a range of difficulties, the most serious being access and personal security in locations where there is a high risk of violent crime. Staff vigilance to mitigate the risks is good. Specialised equipment used in media and sports projects is good. General resources such as furniture, pool tables and computers are adequate, if a little tired-looking. Staff make efforts to use indoor and outdoor space well.

p.8

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

13. The recently produced curriculum framework has a strong emphasis on learning, empowerment, participation and equal opportunities. It is underpinned by a clear rationale reflecting local and national priorities. Youth workers are keen to put it into practice effectively. However, there has been insufficient training to support staff in developing their knowledge on broader outcomes for young people and different methods of delivery. The service provides regular supervision, team meetings and appraisals for all staff, but managers have not used these arrangements systematically to help them assess how well staff understand the curriculum or implement it. A suitable range of training is offered on corporate issues but opportunities are not sharply focussed on professional practice.

p.8

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

14. There is an adequate mix of qualifications and skills in the staff group. All full time workers and the interim management team are professionally qualified to a sufficient level. However, the fact that not all of the full time staff team possess a youth work qualification may have contributed to the weakness in implementing the curriculum. Sessional staff, similarly, are qualified to an appropriate level, but not all in youth work. They bring a range of useful sports and counselling skills to their teams although this in itself does not support the delivery of high quality generic youth work. Key Aspect 3: Leadership and management

p.8

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

15. The service has struggled for some time with turnover in senior staffing, poor management information and a lack of objectivity in measuring its impact. The self- assessment demonstrates an understanding of needs in the area but the high aspirations expressed in it are not yet evident. There is, however, a consensus between the interim head of the service, the director and the relevant elected members about the priorities for improvement. Strategies are compliant with Race Relations Act and safeguarding legislation. Clear plans and essential policy documents have been put in place, helpfully linked to the overarching children and young people’s plan and needs analysis. Most are still embryonic but the service now has an improved capacity in comparison with the recent past.

p.8

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

16. No comprehensive and accurate data exists in relation to young peoples’ attendances and engagement. The interim management team has made some improvements and are considering further changes. Staff collect information locally and suggest that numbers accessing the service have increased over the past year. However, the lack of verified information makes it difficult to assess performance. Haringey Youth Service 7

p.8

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

17. Satisfactory partnership arrangements are in place with Connexions and the Community Safety Partnership. Work is particularly well-targeted around participation, inclusion and prevention of antisocial behaviour. Other partnerships, such as those with schools and health are as yet at an early stage of developed.

p.9

Part C: Commentary on the key aspects

18. Means of monitoring and evaluating provision lack rigour. Quality assurance measures are insufficient and, in part, explain the demonstrably poor achievement of young people through the generic youth work programme. Staff at all levels do not engage young people well in helping them to evaluate the service, assure its quality and manage its future direction to bring about improvements.

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion