Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Emmy Tomsett
- Postcode verified
UB8 1UW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Although action to make improvements is underway this is yet to show sustained impact. p.3
- This was an area for development at the previous unannounced inspection in July 2010. p.3
- This is not consistent with ‘Working Together to Safeguard Children’ 2010. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: Hugh Dunnachie, Chief Executive, London Borough of Hillingdon Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment16
“ Initial assessments seen by inspectors are consistently of a very high quality.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 935
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 26, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Chris Spencer Corporate Director, Education and Children’s Services London Borough of Hillingdon Civic Centre High St Uxbridge Middlesex UB8 1UW
p.1
arrangements within the London Borough of Hillingdon children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the London Borough of Hillingdon Council which was conducted on 18 and 19 January 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within the London Borough of Hillingdon children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within the London Borough of Hillingdon children’s services
The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within the London Borough of Hillingdon children’s services
The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in July 2009 have been addressed with the exception of partner agencies implementation and awareness of thresholds for referral.
p.1
arrangements within the London Borough of Hillingdon children’s services
From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
Initial assessments seen by inspectors are consistently of a very high quality. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
Strengths
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk They lead to sound decision making and effective planning to meet the needs of children and young people. Assessments are comprehensive and contain well evidenced and balanced analysis. Risk and protective factors are consistently identified, well evaluated and planning includes clear contingency strategies.
p.1
Strengths
The diverse needs of children and young people are dealt with sensitively and where relevant equality and diversity issues actively inform assessments and plans for safeguarding. Attention to equality and diversity is prominent throughout case recording and evident in how services are delivered. Excellent local resources are used to meet the identified cultural needs of children and families, for example, links to multicultural support groups and key workers in the community.
p.2
following areas
Decision making on contacts and referrals is appropriate and timely. These are recorded clearly and there is evidence of consistent management oversight with identified directions to social workers.
p.2
following areas
Section 47 enquiries are prioritised appropriately. These are always carried out by a suitably experienced and qualified social worker. Child protection investigations demonstrate comprehensive information gathering and decision making is effective and evidence based.
p.2
following areas
Safeguarding procedures comply with statutory requirements. Decisions are made in accordance with statutory timescales and assessments of children’s needs are prioritised effectively.
p.2
following areas
Partnership working between statutory agencies, on allocated cases, is sound and contributes to the safeguarding of children and young people.
p.2
following areas
Case recording is up-to-date. This enables staff and managers to track and assess significant events which facilitates effective decision making.
p.2
following areas
Children are routinely seen and their wishes and feelings form an integral part of assessments and planning for their future care.
p.2
following areas
The department has effective working relationships with the police and these have led to efficient joint-working to safeguard children and young people.
p.2
following areas
Staff report that caseloads are manageable. All cases are now allocated immediately and this has enabled a fast response to children and their families in need.
p.2
following areas
The common assessment framework is well established and provides effective early intervention services to children and families. A comprehensive and ongoing training programme has been delivered to staff to enable consistency in the use of the framework.
p.2
following areas
Links between the emergency duty team and the referral and assessment team are smooth and information is shared promptly and effectively.
p.3
following areas
A successful recruitment campaign has significantly reduced the number of agency staff. This has resulted in an improvement in the timeliness and quality of initial and core assessments. Children and families now benefit from greater consistency of service provision.
p.3
following areas
Quality assurance processes are well established. An audit programme of safeguarding cases is undertaken by senior managers and the findings are routinely used to improve practice and service delivery.
p.3
following areas
Social workers have a range of training opportunities available to them and are able to access external training to develop practice and improve service delivery.
p.3
following areas
Staff supervision is undertaken regularly. It is reflective, analytical, provides effective support and contributes to improving practice.
p.3
Areas for development
There continues to be a lack of clarity between partner agencies about the thresholds for referrals to the referral and assessment team. Although action to make improvements is underway this is yet to show sustained impact. This was an area for development at the previous unannounced inspection in July 2010.
p.3
Areas for development
Whilst the referral and assessment team complete chronologies consistently, the children with disabilities team do not routinely use chronologies to assist in analysis and decision making regarding safeguarding of children and young people.
p.3
Areas for development
One member of staff who is not a qualified social worker has undertaken both initial and core assessments although this work was of a satisfactory standard. This is not consistent with ‘Working Together to Safeguard Children’ 2010.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Hugh Dunnachie, Chief Executive, London Borough of Hillingdon Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion