Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
TR21 0LY
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Since then, provision to protect children at serious risk of harm or neglect, has been substantially strengthened from the low 2007 baseline. p.2
- The joint area review in 2007 judged provision to be mainly good, but with the very important exception of safeguarding, which was inadequate. p.2
- Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 611
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 30, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Philip Hygate Director of Children's Services Council of the Isles of Scilly Town Hall St Marys Isles of Scilly TR21 0LY
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 002-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Children’s services in the Council of the Isles of Scilly perform adequately.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The joint area review in 2007 judged provision to be mainly good, but with the very important exception of safeguarding, which was inadequate. Since then, provision to protect children at serious risk of harm or neglect, has been substantially strengthened from the low 2007 baseline. Two social work posts have been established and professional support purchased from another authority.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The overall effectiveness of a large majority of inspected services and settings, which are mainly childcare providers, is good or better. The single school is outstanding. However, the local authority’s adoption agency is only adequate. The very large majority of inspected services and settings make a good or better contribution to keeping children and young people safe and helping them to achieve educationally.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
In terms of performance indicators, the large majority of the local authority’s figures are at least in line with both the similar area and national averages. The same applies to those indicators in the staying safe and enjoying and achieving groupings, when compared with the similar area average. However, a very large majority of those indicators is at least in line with the national average and pupil performance in tests and exams is a particular strength. For the one indicator for which a figure is available which measures the gap in outcomes for children and young people whose circumstances make them vulnerable, the gap widened between the current year and the last.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion