Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Lynne Staines
- Postcode verified
PO30 1UD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some assessments are out of timescales before the assessment commences. p.2
- In some cases analysis is of a low standard with insufficient use of historical information. p.2
- Risk and protective factors are not always clearly identified. p.2
- For example, some assessments were closed prematurely leading to further contacts being made soon after case closure. p.3
- Case recording does not always demonstrate how cultural, linguistic, religious or disability needs are addressed. p.3
- Supervision is not providing appropriate challenge of the quality of casework and the professional development of some staff. p.3
- Consequently, resources in the contact, referral and assessment team are not used in the most efficient way. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Records & policies4
“However, the quality of the content of records is variable.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 813
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 31, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 23%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Colin Peak Director of Children’s Services Isle of Wight Council County Hall High Street Newport Isle of Wight PO30 1UD
p.1
arrangements within the Isle of Wight Council children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the Isle of Wight Council which was conducted on 8 and 9 June 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within the Isle of Wight Council children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within the Isle of Wight Council children’s services
The inspection identified areas of strength and satisfactory practice, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within the Isle of Wight Council children’s services
From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
The new senior management team are providing strong leadership and structure leading to improvements in front line services. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Satisfactory practice
Decisions are made in accordance with statutory timescales. All contacts are seen by a manager within 24-hours and appropriate decisions about incoming work are being made.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Section 47 enquiries are undertaken in a timely manner by appropriately qualified and trained social workers.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Child protection work is prioritised. At the time of inspection there was no unallocated work within the duty and assessment service.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Thresholds for the provision of safeguarding services are the subject of multi- agency agreements and consistently applied.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Use of the common assessment framework is increasing leading to early intervention to meet the needs of children through a range of family support services.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Despite capacity issues caseloads are of manageable proportions. Newly qualified staff receive support and undertake work in accordance with their level of experience.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Case records are up-to-date. However, the quality of the content of records is variable.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Clear working arrangements between the Intervention and Assessment team and Children with Disabilities teams on complex cases helps to ensure that the assessed needs of children and young people are fully understood and responded to appropriately.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
The Local Safeguarding Children Board ensures that lessons from serious case reviews and research to improve the quality of front line practice are communicated to all staff.
p.2
Areas for development
Due to limited social worker capacity, children in need work is not always allocated in a timely manner. Some assessments are out of timescales before the assessment commences.
p.2
Areas for development
Performance indicators are generally satisfactory in comparison with statistical neighbours although in relation to the timeliness of completion of core assessments performance is significantly lower.
p.2
Areas for development
Initial and core assessments are of variable quality and management oversight of the quality and timeliness of assessments is not consistently rigorous. In some cases analysis is of a low standard with insufficient use of historical information. Risk and protective factors are not always clearly identified.
p.2
Areas for development
Some assessments contain insufficient information to make effective decisions or plans. For example, some assessments were closed prematurely leading to further contacts being made soon after case closure.
p.3
Areas for development
Information regarding the ethnicity of families is not consistently gathered at the point of contact. Case recording does not always demonstrate how cultural, linguistic, religious or disability needs are addressed.
p.3
Areas for development
Although children and young people are seen routinely, recording and plans do not consistently evidence that their wishes or those of their parents and/or carers are taken into account in assessment and planning processes.
p.3
Areas for development
The frequency and quality of recording of supervision are inconsistent. Supervision is not providing appropriate challenge of the quality of casework and the professional development of some staff.
p.3
Areas for development
Decision-making and effective planning is not sufficiently well evidenced in case records.
p.3
Areas for development
There is no effective protocol between partner agencies to screen and consider the best response to the large numbers of incidents of domestic abuse that are referred to the council. Consequently, resources in the contact, referral and assessment team are not used in the most efficient way.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Steve Benyon, Chief Executive, Isle of Wight Council Pam Robinson, Chair of Isle of Wight Safeguarding Children Board Dawn Cousins, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Isle of Wight Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion