3 star Proven Secure

OVERALL RATING

Current Performance Indications of Improvement Capacity to Sustain Improvement

p.1

SUMMARY INFORMATION

Current Performance Indications of Improvement Capacity to Sustain Improvement Sum of the Weighted scores 35.00 15.06 14.00 Sum of Weights 18.00 8.00 12.00

p.1

3 star Proven Secure

2. The Overall Average Score thresholds for the Current Performance star ratings are as follows: 3 star is obtained if the overall average score is less than or equal to 2.37 2 star (upper) is obtained if the overall average score is more than 2.37 but less than or equal to 2.79 2 star (lower) is obtained if the overall average score is more than 2.79 but less than or equal to 3.34 1 star is obtained if the overall average score is more than 3.34 but less than or equal to 3.75 - star is obtained if the overall average score is greater than 3.75

p.1

3 star Proven Secure

The Overall average score thresholds for the improvement categories are as follows: ' Proven ' and ' Secure ' are obtained if the overall average scores are less than or equal to 3 ' Not Proven ' and ' Not Secure ' are obtained if the overall average scores are greater than 3

p.1

Comprehensive Performance Assessment - 2004 (v.14.07)

1. The Overall Average Score for each perspective is calculated using all indicators in the perspective across the 5 aspects. It multiplies each indicator's score by its associated weight (i.e. the weighted score), and then dividing the sum of the weighted scores by the sum of the weights (shown above). In a few instances where indicators are not applicable to some LEAs, the sum of the weighted scores and the sum of the weights are adjusted accordingly (i.e. the indicator(s) and its weight(s) are not included in the calculations). The overall average score is then compared to the category thresholds (see 2 below) and the final category determined. Further details on the indicators used can be found on the scorecard and the CPA Education Guidelines.

p.1

Score

1_A1 Percentage of schools causing concern (excluding inadequate sixth forms)* 0.00 1_B1 0.5 Percentage of primary schools causing concern Trend (2002 to 2004)* 0.00 1_C1

p.2

schools graded V or G for management and efficiency

1_A2 0.5 2003 KS2 English Average Point Score* 27.67 1_B2 0.5 Percentage of secondary schools causing concern (excluding inadequate sixth forms) Trend (2002 to 2004)* 0.00 1_C2 JRS 6 - allocation of resources to priorities

p.2

schools graded V or G for management and efficiency

1_A3 0.5 2003 KS2 Mathematics Average Point Score* 27.56 1_B3 0.5 KS2 English Average Point Score Trend (2001 to 2003)* 0.02 1_C3 JRS 25 - performance management of services to support school improvement

p.2

schools graded V or G for management and efficiency

1_A4 0.5 2003 KS2-KS3 VA* 99.30 1_B4 0.5 KS2 Mathematics Average Point Score Trend (2001 to 2003)* 0.00 1_C4 JRS 27 - effectiveness of services to support school improvement

p.2

schools graded V or G for management and efficiency

1_A5 0.5 2003 KS3-GCSE VA* 101.00 1_B5 0.11 KS3 English Average Point Score Trend (2001 to 2003)* 1.36 1_C5 EDP Grade

p.2

schools graded V or G for management and efficiency

1_A6 JRS 14 - support to schools for raising standards in curriculum use of ICT 1_B6 0.11 KS3 Mathematics Average Point Score Trend (2001 to 2003)* 1.34

p.2

schools graded V or G for management and efficiency

1_A7 JRS 4 - effectiveness of strategy for school improvement 1_B7 0.11 KS3 Science Average Point Score Trend (2001 to 2003)* 0.87

p.2

schools graded V or G for management and efficiency

1_A8 JRS 1 (Context) - JRS 2 (Performance) 1_B8 0.67 GCSE Average Point Score Trend (2001 to 2003)* 0.68

p.2

schools graded V or G for management and efficiency

1_B9 JRS 5 - progress in implementing strategy for school improvement

p.2

schools graded V or G for management and efficiency

1_B10 GCSE 5+ A*-C Percentage Trend (Schools <25% in 1999) (2001 to 2003)* - -

p.2

schools graded V or G for management and efficiency

AVERAGE SCORE = 1.50 AVERAGE SCORE = 2.26 AVERAGE SCORE = 1.20

p.2

Score

2_A1 JRS 30 - effectiveness of LEA in meeting statutory obligations 2_B1 JRS31 - effectiveness in exercising functions to support school improvement 2_C1 JRS 29 - effectiveness of strategy for SEN

p.2

Score

2_A2 Percentage of pupils for whom a statement is issued for the first time within 18 weeks* 73.00

p.2

Score

AVERAGE SCORE = 2.00 AVERAGE SCORE = 1.00 AVERAGE SCORE = 1.00

p.2

Score

3_A1 0.5 2004 Primary Attendance Rate* 93.79 3_B1 0.5 Primary Attendance Rate Trend (2002 to 2004)* 0.43 3_C1 JRS 33 - overall effectiveness of the LEA in promoting social inclusion

p.2

Score

3_A2 0.5 2004 Secondary Attendance Rate* 92.64 3_B2 0.5 Secondary Attendance Rate Trend (2002 to 2004)* 0.46 3_C2 JRS 42 - effectiveness of the LEA in combating racism

p.2

Score

3_A3 2003 GCSE 1+ A*-G Percentage (children in public care)* 33.33 3_B3 Percentage of pupils receiving alternative tuition reintegrated into schools* 18.95 3_C3

p.2

schools graded V or G for climate

3_A4 2003 GCSE 1+ A*-G Percentage* 95.08 3_B4 GCSE 1+ A*-G percentage Trend (2001 to 2003)* 0.64

p.2

schools graded V or G for climate

3_A6 JRS 16 - support for EM and Traveller children AVERAGE SCORE = 2.60 AVERAGE SCORE = 1.67 AVERAGE SCORE = 1.00

p.2

16-17 year old participation rates in education and training

77.00 No Indicatiors 4_C1 JRS 49 - effectiveness of the co-ordination of actions in support of priorities

p.2

Insp judgements for Percenatge V, G provision for foundation stage

AVERAGE SCORE = 2.50 AVERAGE SCORE = - AVERAGE SCORE = 1.00

p.2

Score

5_A1 JRS 52 - overall effectiveness of the LEA No Indicatiors 5_C1 JRS 51 - capacity of the LEA to improve -

p.2

Score

5_A2 JRS 45 - effectiveness of decision making 5_C2 JRS 7 - effectiveness of strategies to promote continuous improvement

p.2

Score

5_A3 0.5 JRS 34 - extent to which LEA meets its requirements (places) 5_C3

p.2

schools graded V or G overall

5_A4 0.5 JRS 36 - extent to which LEA meets its requirements (admissions) AVERAGE SCORE = 1.33 AVERAGE SCORE = - AVERAGE SCORE = 1.50

p.2

1.17

Notes: 1. For JRS indicators scores are calculated so that; grades 1 and 2 equate to a score of 1; grade 3, 4 and 5 equate to scores of 2, 3 and 4 respectively; and grades 6 and 7 equate to a score of 5. For non-JRS indicators scores please consult CPA guidance. 2. The average score for each aspect within a perspective is calculated by multiplying each indicator's score in the aspect by its associated weight, added together (i.e the sum of the weighted scores) and then divided by the sum of the weights

p.2

PLEASE NOTE

: Where an indicator is not applicable, this indicator and its weighting

p.2

are not

included in the calculations in notes 2 and 3 above. 4. For more information on the indicators, please see the 'Contents and Operation of the Education Profile' at www.ofsted.gov.uk/lea

p.2

*

= Thresholds from the 2002/2003 model used to calculate scores

p.2

Current Performance ( A )

3. The Overall Average Score for each perspective is calculated using all indicators in the perspective across the 5 aspects. It is not the aggregated average of the average scores FOR EACH ASPECT within the perspective shown above. It is calculated by multiplying each indicator's score

p.2

Current Performance ( A )

by its associated weight (i.e. the weighted score), and then dividing the sum of the weighted scores by the sum of the weights.

p.2