Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Local authority data pack

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    W8 7NX

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+31Mostly positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingvery wellsuccessfulvery highmake good progressstrongsafeimproved
Criticismpoorweakerpoorlyweaknessesseriouslygapsharmbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1217w+14
  • What needs to improve220w+75

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,436
shorter than usual (typical 3558)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 50
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Mrs Libby Blake Interim Executive Director of Family and Children's Services Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea Room 229, Kensington Town Hall Hornton Street, London W8 7NX

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

Ofsted guidance published in July 2010 explains that the annual assessment of children’s services is derived from the performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This performance profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the local authority has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant indicators in the National Indicator Set (NIS).

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

In reaching the assessment of children’s services, Ofsted has taken account of all inspected and regulated services for children and young people, arrangements for making sure children are safe and stay safe and performance against national measures. More weight has been given to the outcomes of Ofsted’s inspections and regulatory visits (Blocks A and B in the performance profile).

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

The annual assessment derives from a four point scale:

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, an assessment of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, an assessment of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. As in 2009, while the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s assessment, meeting or not meeting the minimum requirements alone does not define the grade. The assessment has involved the application of inspector judgement. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020 7421 6666 Direct F 020 7421 5633 Juliet.Winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Children’s services assessment Performs excellently (4)

Children’s services in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea continue to perform excellently.

p.2

Children’s services assessment Performs excellently (4)

The very large majority of services, settings and institutions inspected by Ofsted are good or outstanding and most are better than in similar areas and nationally. Almost all do particularly well at supporting learning and achievement and in keeping children and young people safe. Provision for early years and childcare is mostly good and most nursery and primary schools are good or outstanding. All secondary and special schools are either good or outstanding, as is provision for learning after the age of 16, arrangements for adoption and fostering and children’s homes. Only childminders and the pupil referral unit fall below this very high standard because over 40% of childminders remain only satisfactory, although showing significant recent improvement, as is the pupil referral unit.

p.2

Children’s services assessment Performs excellently (4)

A recent unannounced inspection of front-line child protection services found significant strengths and no areas in need of priority action.

p.2

Children’s services assessment Performs excellently (4)

National measures of performance show the very large majority of outcomes are in line with or above those for similar areas or nationally, including all outcomes for educational attainment and progress. Standards in primary and secondary schools, already well above similar areas, continue to rise. Children and young people, including those from low-income families and those with special educational needs, make good progress in their learning. Gaps in educational attainment for key vulnerable groups that are almost all smaller than in similar authorities and nationally have closed well, although some got bigger in 2009. Despite consistent reduction in recent years, poor attendance in secondary schools rose in 2009 to match levels in similar authorities.

p.2

Children’s services assessment Performs excellently (4)

Key areas for further development ƒ Improve childminders further so that more are good or better and the pupil referral unit from satisfactory to at least good. ƒ Reduce numbers of pupils with poor attendance in secondary schools.

p.2

Outcomes for children and young people

Local arrangements to encourage children and young people to live healthy lifestyles are mostly very successful but weaker from childminders and in the pupil referral unit. Improvements include more mothers breast-feeding and far fewer five-year- olds who are too overweight. Despite many more young people taking part in sport regularly and many who are very satisfied with parks and playgrounds, more 11- year-olds are seriously overweight. Fewer children and young people than nationally consider they get on well with their friends and family but children in care are positive about themselves and their friendships. Low and rapidly reducing numbers of young women under the age of 18 become pregnant and more young mothers are in education, training or work.

p.2

Outcomes for children and young people

Arrangements for keeping children and young people safe are almost always good or outstanding but weaker for childminders. Within the community, fewer children are now killed or seriously injured in road traffic accidents and fewer are admitted to hospital because they are accidently or deliberately injured. Fewer children run away from home or care than nationally. In front-line child protection services, high numbers of referrals are assessed by a social worker and high numbers of initial and full assessments are completed on time. Inspection found prompt action, suitable decisions, timely and at least satisfactory assessments, good record keeping and regular supervision that minimised risk to children. Relative weaknesses were: not taking enough account of cultural issues and the views of children in their assessments. Successful action now results in far fewer children with plans in place to protect them from harm needing another plan after the first one has ended. Most

p.3

Outcomes for children and young people

meetings to review these plans are held on time. Children in care now have fewer placement moves and almost all meetings to review their plans are held on time.

p.3

Outcomes for children and young people

Services and settings are very successful at helping children and young people to achieve highly, although the pupil referral unit is weaker. The achievement of five- year-olds has improved quickly, and significantly so in 2009, but the gap for those not doing as well has closed more slowly than expected locally. Pupils in primary schools make good progress and for 16-year-olds, higher grade examination results improved significantly in 2009. All secondary schools continue to meet minimum standards for pupil performance and average numbers continue to have good or outstanding standards of behaviour. Poor attendance in secondary schools has now increased although it is no worse than in similar areas. Permanent exclusions from school are above national figures.

p.3

Outcomes for children and young people

Almost all services and settings give outstanding support to children and young people to contribute to their communities. Average numbers take part in organised activities and about the same number as in similar authorities say they have been drunk or taken drugs recently. Far fewer young people now break the law for the first time, re-offending is reducing, although remaining above similar areas, and numbers sentenced to custody remain average. Average numbers of young offenders are in education, training or work but fewer are now in suitable accommodation.

p.3

Outcomes for children and young people

Services and settings give very strong support to achieving economic well-being, although less so in the pupil referral unit. Average numbers of young people remain in education, training or work. By the age of 19, those from low-income families are much better qualified than others in the country. The large majority of young people leaving care remain in education, training or employment and all have a suitable place to live. Average numbers of low-income families make use of the funding available for childcare.

p.3

Prospects for improvement

Outcomes continue to improve, as do educational standards that are already very high. Most services and settings contribute very strongly to the overall well-being of children and young people, and the local authority is absolutely determined that all will succeed. It sets challenging targets and involves young people in deciding on key areas of work very well. Data are used particularly well to target important areas, partners work very well together and all actions are reviewed thoroughly to make sure that they are making a difference. Resources are used creatively to set up highly successful and innovative projects and best practice is shared very well. The Children and Young People’s Plan shows well chosen priorities to tackle weaknesses, good and well targeted actions, considerable success and a clear understanding of what still needs to be done to improve outcomes further. The unannounced inspection of front-line child protection services found clear leadership, strong

p.4

Prospects for improvement

commitment to improve an already highly performing service, competent staff and regular monitoring, including by the Local Safeguarding Children Board. The youth offending service is performing well against national measures and has good capacity and capability to sustain and improve its performance further.

p.4

Prospects for improvement

This children’s services assessment is provided in accordance with section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006.

p.4

Prospects for improvement

Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, Children’s Services Assessment

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion