Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen Hunt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen Hunt

  • Postcode verified

    KT1 1SN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+65Positivemore positive than 63% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh qualitystronghighly effectivevery effectivestrengtheffectivelyimproved
Criticismrisk of harmseriousweaknot alwaysdelay

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings745w+88
  • What needs to improve116w−64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
861
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 25, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 13%

Full report text

Mr Duncan Clark Strategic Director of Learning and Children’s Services Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Guildhall 2 St James Road Kingston upon Thames Surrey KT1 1SN

p.1

children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Council which was conducted on 9 and 10 November 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with one area for development.

p.1

children’s services

The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in February 2010 have been met. The council provided increased resources to tackle delay effectively in the completion of initial assessments. Operational support by managers has significantly strengthened. Changes agreed to the out-of-hours emergency duty team arrangements shared with four neighbouring London boroughs have improved the ease of access for service users. Although the computer systems for recording the different levels of service Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

children’s services

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk provision have not changed, systems have been strengthened sufficiently to ensure that key information is not missed.

p.1

children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Use of the common assessment framework remains strong, supported by a high quality information sharing service (known as ASKK - Advancing Services for Kingston Kids) linked to the contact and assessment service. These very effective arrangements ensure that the needs of children and young people are properly screened to determine the appropriate level of safeguarding service.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Working relationships with partner agencies remain highly effective. The quality of responsive joint working has a high impact on the effectiveness of initial interventions to safeguard children and young people.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Staff value and benefit from high quality, regular supervision and management oversight. The effectiveness of supervision is evident in the quality of decisions recorded on case files.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ A well developed and robust culture of performance management and organisational learning is in evidence across the service. Managers carry out regular audits, and findings contribute to continuing practice development. Particularly strong organisational learning has resulted from the analysis of serious case reviews, with positive impact on the safeguarding of children and young people.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Assessments are clear and analytical, risk and protective factors are identified and effective plans implemented.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Assessments demonstrate that the views of children are considered and their wishes and feelings are routinely taken into account. Staff are skilled in enabling children with disabilities to ensure their voices are heard in child protection investigations.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Child protection procedures are kept up-to-date and comply with statutory requirements. They are understood and applied by staff consistently, with effective management oversight to ensure the safety of children and young people.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Decision-making is prompt, and most assessments are completed in accordance with timescales set out in statutory guidance, which ensures that children and young people receive a timely and appropriate service. ƒ Effective arrangements, such as good access to interpreters, are in place to meet the diverse needs of children with respect to race, culture, religion and disability. The relevance of equality and diversity is suitably addressed in assessment and case planning. Strategic planning is focused appropriately on reducing inequalities in outcomes through targeted service provision.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Record-keeping is up-to-date and demonstrates effective management of the risk of harm, sound decision-making and effective planning.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Out-of-hours duty arrangements demonstrate effective responses and appropriate referral to the contact and assessment service.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Staff report that workloads are manageable.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Staff are suitably qualified and enhance their safeguarding knowledge and skills through high quality training and developmental opportunities.

p.3

Area for development

ƒ A chronology of significant events and agency and professional contact with the child and family is not always present in case files. This is due to a weak functionality in the information technology system. Managers are aware of this and plans are in hand to ensure that improvement is achieved.

p.3

Area for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Bruce McDonald, Chief Executive, Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Ann Dominey, Chair of Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Safeguarding Children Board Councillor Patricia Bamford, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion