Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
HD1 6QW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Although no secondary schools are judged to be inadequate, only just over half are judged to be good or better. p.2
- However, the private fostering arrangements are inadequate. p.2
- Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. p.1
- Three serious case reviews have been carried out since December 2008, two of which were conducted adequately and one was good. p.2
- The most recent of these identified weaknesses in multi-agency child protection, including the work of the local authority’s children’s services. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 654
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 30, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Alison O’Sullivan Director of Children and Young People Kirklees Metropolitan Council Oldgate House 2 Oldgate Huddersfield HD1 6QW
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Children’s services in Kirklees Metropolitan Council perform adequately.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Performance in nursery and primary schools, pupil referral units, school sixth forms and sixth form colleges is above that found in similar areas and that seen nationally. Although no secondary schools are judged to be inadequate, only just over half are judged to be good or better. The overall effectiveness of childcare providers is below that found nationally and in similar areas; that for childminders is above that of similar areas. Judgements for staying safe and enjoying and achieving in inspected services are good or better in the very large majority of cases.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Provision in social care settings, including children’s homes and the local authority’s fostering and adoption services, is good or better. However, the private fostering arrangements are inadequate. Three serious case reviews have been carried out since December 2008, two of which were conducted adequately and one was good. The most recent of these identified weaknesses in multi-agency child protection, including the work of the local authority’s children’s services. These findings have contributed significantly towards determining the judgement of performs adequately for the authority’s children’s services. Two thirds of special schools were judged to be at least good at their last inspection, with the remaining third adequate; both pupil referral units were good.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Performance against the very large majority of indicators, including those for staying safe, is at least in line with similar areas and national figures. The very large majority of indicators for enjoying and achieving are at least in line with similar areas. There are some weaknesses in outcomes for some minority ethnic groups at the ages of both 11 and 16. The number of young people not in education, employment or training is high and rose again in 2008.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion