Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen Hunt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen Hunt

  • Postcode verified

    SW9 7QE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlytimelystrengthimprovedknowledgeablepromptlyaccurate
Criticismat risknot consistentlyharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings604w+61
  • What needs to improve101w−25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
705
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 18, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Ms Debbie Jones Executive Director, Children and Young People’s Service London Borough of Lambeth International House Canterbury Crescent London SW9 7QE

p.1

arrangements within the London Borough of Lambeth children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the London Borough of Lambeth Council, which was conducted on 21 and 22 September 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within the London Borough of Lambeth children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within the London Borough of Lambeth children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within the London Borough of Lambeth children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ The Local authority has well-developed and effective multi-agency responses for the protection and safeguarding of children and young people, including a multi-agency rapid response team and multi-agency risk management panel. Specialists in health, housing and domestic violence issues are integrated fully into the contact, referral and assessment service. Thresholds are understood and consistently applied across all agencies, leading to improved consistency in Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk timely referral and intervention to safeguard children and young people.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Implementation of innovative working arrangements in high risk, high profile cases of domestic violence, those involving guns and gangs, and with the Lambeth Black Parents Forum provide a preventative service to children and young people who are at risk of harm.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Efficient use of resources and good systems to deliver timely and focused responses to child protection, supported by an effective electronic case management system that is used consistently by all staff to enable accountability, accuracy of information and monitoring of the quality and progress of cases.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Highly motivated staff that are supported by knowledgeable, experienced and accessible managers at all levels to ensure effective assessment and intervention to safeguard children and young people.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Good quality assessments are undertaken to ensure that the needs of children and young people are met. Risk and protective factors that impact on a child’s safety are assessed consistently.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Child protection procedures comply with statutory requirements. They are understood and applied by staff consistently, with effective management oversight to ensure the safety of children and young people.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Workloads are manageable and cases are allocated promptly to enable timely safeguarding of children and young people.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Section 47 enquiries are comprehensive and timely and lead to appropriate safeguarding actions.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Out-of-hours duty arrangements demonstrate effective responses and timely referral to the contact and assessment service.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Assessments ensure that the views of children are considered and their wishes and feelings are routinely taken into account.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Record-keeping is up-to-date, leading to good accountability, maintaining accurate information and enabling management oversight to develop best safeguarding practice.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff are suitably qualified and have good opportunities for professional development to ensure they remain up-to-date with best practice and their safeguarding responsibilities.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Case records do not consistently reflect the impact and relevance of culture, ethnicity or beliefs when assessing the needs of children and their families.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Arrangements for obtaining the views of children and young people to contribute to service improvement are underdeveloped.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Derrick Anderson Chief Executive, London Borough of Lambeth David Sanders, Independent Chair of London Borough of Lambeth Safeguarding Children Board Cllr Peter Robbins, Cabinet Member for Children and Young People Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion