Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Helen Humphreys
- Postcode verified
PR1 8RJ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The council have recognised this and have plans to change the balance of the teams. p.3
- However appropriate management arrangements and a robust action plan is in place to address the immediate deficiencies p.3
- This was identified as an area for development at the last inspection. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: Ged Fitzgerald, Chief Executive, Lancashire County Council Nigel Burke, Chair of Lancashire Safeguarding Children Board Susie Charles, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Lancashire County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 908
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 30, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Helen Denton Executive Director for Children and Young People Lancashire County Council County Hall Preston Lancashire PR1 8RJ
p.1
arrangements within Lancashire County Council children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Lancashire County Council which was conducted on 30 November and 1 December 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating next year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Lancashire County Council children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within Lancashire County Council children’s services
The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Lancashire County Council children’s services
The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements on 3 and 4 November 2009 have been addressed with the exception of the completion of timely initial assessments.
p.1
arrangements within Lancashire County Council children’s services
From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
Following the previous inspection the council took decisive and extensive action to address the findings including the commissioning of specific research Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
Strengths
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk to evaluate the effectiveness of the service. The council have acted on the findings and made significant structural changes to the service which means that children and families receive a localised service and a reduction in the number of professionals involved in their care.
p.1
following areas
The central contact, assessment and referral team (CART) ensures a consistent response to all contacts with appropriate and detailed referrals sent to the district offices, enabling swifter allocation of work.
p.2
following areas
The information systems developed by CART provide the council with good quality data about the referrals which has shaped further work with partners.
p.2
following areas
Children suffering or at risk of harm receive a prompt and appropriate response. Strategy discussions are held at appropriate times involving a range of agencies and in two of the three offices visited these are detailed and clear.
p.2
following areas
Section 47 enquiries are undertaken by qualified social workers who are supported by experienced managers.
p.2
following areas
The majority of assessments are of good quality with clear analysis and conclusions which flow logically from the assessments and are translated into effective plans.
p.2
following areas
The cultural, religious and other important information about the needs of children are identified and reflected in most assessments. Good arrangements were observed in ensuring appropriate use of interpreters and the pursuit of investigations into possible sexual exploitation.
p.2
following areas
The views of children and family members are recorded and taken into account in assessments and planning.
p.2
following areas
The Integrated Children’s System is an efficient tool and enables staff to record information in a logical manner. The council takes appropriate steps to continually improve the system. Record keeping generally is up-to-date.
p.2
following areas
There are good working relationships with the out-of-hours service and arrangements are in place for joint visits and welfare checks.
p.2
following areas
Most staff benefit from regular and reflective supervision. A range of training opportunities are available for staff, including lessons learned from serious case reviews.
p.2
following areas
Senior managers are visible and provide good support and staff are satisfied with their working arrangements.
p.2
Areas for development
There is an uneven distribution of experienced and newly qualified social workers within the social work teams which means that some newly qualified social workers do not have appropriate arrangements in place for mentoring, protected case loads, co-working of difficult cases and regular supervision. The council have recognised this and have plans to change the balance of the teams.
p.3
Areas for development
There are significant challenges at one office including staff vacancies, team deployment issues, use of agency staff and high staff case loads, leading to deficits in the timeliness and quality of assessments, transfer of cases and quality of supervision. However appropriate management arrangements and a robust action plan is in place to address the immediate deficiencies
p.3
Areas for development
The rationale for actions taken by managers is not routinely recorded in all cases.
p.3
Areas for development
The timely completion of initial assessments varies across the council. This was identified as an area for development at the last inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
The protocol of transfer of cases between teams is not consistently applied which means that social workers in some initial assessment teams are carrying long term work undermining their ability to complete assessments promptly.
p.3
Areas for development
The use of the common assessment framework continues to be under- developed across the partnership; the council are aware of this and have plans in place to re-launch the arrangements to improve the level of uptake and quality and service to families.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Ged Fitzgerald, Chief Executive, Lancashire County Council Nigel Burke, Chair of Lancashire Safeguarding Children Board Susie Charles, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Lancashire County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion