Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Neil Penswick
- Postcode verified
LS2 8DT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There are a number of different systems for recording casework information which prevents a clear audit trail of actions taken and decisions made. p.3
- This has been recognised by the authority and a new computer system is to be commissioned. p.3
- This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection. p.3
- However, the quality of recording still varies. p.3
- The local authority is aware of these issues, having been identified through their own performance management systems, and this is a focus of an improvement programme. p.3
- Single agency visits are undertaken and children are protected. p.3
- However, in some cases seen by inspectors this did not meet the agreed protocol for when joint visits should be undertaken by those agencies. p.3
- The local authority and the West Yorkshire Police are aware of these issues and are reviewing at a senior management level the deficits in practice. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,186
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Nigel Richardson Director of Children’s Services Leeds City Council Merrion House 110 Merrion Way Leeds LS2 8DT
p.1
arrangements within Leeds City Council Children’s Services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Leeds City Council which was conducted on 18 and 19 January 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Leeds City Council Children’s Services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and advanced practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers and other practitioners.
p.1
arrangements within Leeds City Council Children’s Services
The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Leeds City Council Children’s Services
Due to the poor performance of children’s services identified at the last inspection, the Secretary of State issued an improvement notice. An Improvement Board was established to provide effective challenge to drive swift and sustainable progress through a robust improvement plan. The areas of priority action identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements on 21 and 22 July 2009 have been addressed. The areas of development identified at the previous inspection have been mostly met with firm arrangements in place to deliver on the remaining issues. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
arrangements within Leeds City Council Children’s Services
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
There has been considerable progress to improve the contact, referral and assessment arrangements from the time of the last inspection, when there had been significant variations in the consistency and practice of these services and children had been identified as having been left at potential risk of significant harm. Senior managers provide a strong leadership for children’s services and this has resulted in a remarkable and impressive improvement in the quality of the services inspected and the safety of children in the city. This was an area for priority action in the last unannounced inspection.
p.2
following areas
Leeds City Council has made a significant investment and commitment to continue to provide additional resources to this area of work. This has ensured that front line assessment services are now fit for purpose and with the capacity to continue to improve. This was an area for priority action in the last unannounced inspection.
p.2
following areas
Inspectors did not identify any cases where children had been left at risk. This was an area for priority action in the last unannounced inspection.
p.2
following areas
In all cases examined by inspectors, children were visited and seen alone where appropriate. This was an area for priority action in the last unannounced inspection.
p.2
following areas
Thresholds for the referral of cases of concern to children’s services have been clarified and this has resulted in a better identification and response to need. This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection.
p.2
following areas
The quality of contact, referral and assessments work undertaken by children’s social care is much improved and now meets statutory guidance. This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection.
p.2
following areas
Inspectors saw consistent practice in the teams visited, especially concerning the quality and timeliness of the completion of assessments. This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection.
p.2
following areas
The city council contact centre receives all referrals and passes these on to the assessment teams in a timely manner. The quality of information recorded and passed on to relevant services is much improved. This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection.
p.2
following areas
Referring agencies are routinely contacted to inform them of the decisions made by children’s social care at the completion of assessments. In most cases assessment records are also shared with the families. This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection.
p.2
following areas
Child Protection procedures are up-to-date. New on-line internal procedures for social care have been produced and Leeds City Council is part of the West Yorkshire Consortium which produces a set of procedures for four Local Safeguarding Children Board areas. Each set of procedures is updated on a six monthly basis, most recently in January 2011. This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection.
p.3
following areas
Systems have been introduced to ensure effective performance management. This includes a process where service managers review team managers’ decisions on all contacts, referrals and assessments. Examples were also seen of good quality assurance and case recording audits. This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection.
p.3
following areas
Performance indicators show an improving performance across the teams in the completion of assessments in a timely manner. The management recording of when an assessment is concluded is consistent with national guidance. This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection.
p.3
following areas
Social work staff have manageable caseloads, regular supervision and access to appropriate training. Newly qualified social workers receive a comprehensive support package. This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection.
p.3
following areas
The ethnic, cultural and disability needs of children are responded to in a sensitive manner, acknowledging their individual needs.
p.3
Areas for development
The electronic social care record system does not meet the requirements of the service. There are a number of different systems for recording casework information which prevents a clear audit trail of actions taken and decisions made. This has been recognised by the authority and a new computer system is to be commissioned. This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
The quality of assessments has much improved. However, the quality of recording still varies. The local authority is aware of these issues, having been identified through their own performance management systems, and this is a focus of an improvement programme. This was an area for development in the last unannounced inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
In most cases strategy discussions take place with the West Yorkshire Police in a timely and planned manner. Single agency visits are undertaken and children are protected. However, in some cases seen by inspectors this did not meet the agreed protocol for when joint visits should be undertaken by those agencies. The local authority and the West Yorkshire Police are aware of these issues and are reviewing at a senior management level the deficits in practice.
p.3
Areas for development
Arrangements for out-of-hours service do not effectively link with the daytime service. This has been recognised by the authority and a review is being undertaken.
p.4
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.4
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Tom Riordan, Chief Executive, Leeds City Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion