Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Local authority data pack

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    SE6 4RU

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentstrongeffectivegood progressexceptionalvery effectivevery well
Criticisminadequatebelowmissedlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1023w+78
  • Leadership36w+73

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,014
shorter than usual (typical 3558)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 50
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 97%Leadership 3%

Full report text

Ms Frankie Sulke Executive Director Children and Young People London Borough of Lewisham 3 rd Floor, Laurence House 1 Catford Road London SE6 4RU

p.1

2008

This letter summarises the findings of the 2008 annual performance assessment (APA) for your council. The evaluations and judgements in the letter draw on a range of data and information which covers the period 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008. As you know, the APA is not based on an inspection of your services and, therefore, can only provide a snapshot based on the evidence considered. As such, I am grateful to you for assuring the quality of the data provided.

p.1

2008

Performance is judged on a four point scale as detailed in the handbook. I should emphasise that the grades awarded are based on an overall ‘best fit’ model. For instance, an outstanding judgement of Grade 4 reflects that overall most aspects, but not necessarily all, of the services in the area are working very well. We know that one of the features of outstanding provision is the drive for greater improvement and no council would suggest, and nor would Ofsted, that a judgement of outstanding indicates that everything is perfect. Similarly within a judgement of inadequate overall, Grade 1, there could be some aspects of the overall service that are adequate or even good. Judgements are made in a rounded way, balancing all of the evidence and giving due consideration to outcomes, local and national contexts, priorities and decision-making. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

2008

www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 945 6293 Direct F 0117 945 6554 South_apa@ofsted.gov.uk The following table sets out the grades awarded for performance in 2008.

p.1

Assessment judgement area APA grade

Overall effectiveness of children’s services 3 Being healthy 3 Staying safe 3 Enjoying and achieving 3 Making a positive contribution 4 Achieving economic well-being 4 Capacity to improve, including the management of services for children and young people

p.2

Assessment judgement area APA grade

Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale 4: outstanding/excellent; 3: good; 2: adequate; 1: inadequate

p.2

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

The London Borough of Lewisham consistently delivers good services. The council has made good progress in responding to the recommendations made in the 2007 APA and the joint area review report published in October 2007. In particular, the council has been successful in narrowing the gap for vulnerable groups. There has been good progress in taking steps to fully implement the practice audit systems within children’s social care and reducing the number of social care vacancies. The council has improved its performance in enabling children and young people to stay safe, which is now good, by ensuring compliance with the practice audit, reducing the proportion of children and young people in residential care, and improving long- term stability for looked after children and young people. There is continued good performance in enabling children and young people to be healthy and to enjoy and achieve in their education. Lewisham’s accelerated improvement over the past four

p.3

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

years has outstripped the national trend at Key Stages 3 and 4 and is closing the gap with the national average at GCSE. However, continued improvements are needed in some areas to keep up with rising national standards. The council has sustained outstanding performance in enabling children and young people to make a positive contribution and to achieve economic well-being. For these reasons the council’s capacity to improve is outstanding, as it was last year. The council’s analysis of its strengths and areas for development is consistent with the evidence. There are no additional recommendations to make as a result of the APA.

p.3

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

The children's services grade is the performance rating for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will also provide the score for the children and young people service block in the comprehensive performance assessment to be published by the Audit Commission.

p.3

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

We are grateful for the information you provided as part of this process and for the time given by you and your colleagues in preparing for the assessment.

p.3

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager Local Services Inspection

p.3

Being healthy

ƒ Strong focus on promoting health through well developed, community based collocated services. ƒ Effective and comprehensive child and adolescent mental health services. ƒ Effective integrated approach to screening for sexually transmitted diseases, resulting in improved rates of identification and treatment.

p.4

Being healthy

ƒ High levels of teenage pregnancy above statistical neighbours. ƒ High levels of childhood obesity.

p.4

Staying safe

ƒ Effective prevention and early intervention infrastructure with strong commitment to multi-agency working. ƒ Good and improving performance and practice in improving stability of placements for looked after children. ƒ Effective progress made in addressing safeguarding issues identified in the Joint Area Review; in particular quality assurance of frontline practice.

p.4

Staying safe

ƒ High levels of children who are made subject of child protection plans for a second or subsequent time.

p.4

Enjoying and achieving

ƒ Good achievement and particularly rapid progress for Black Caribbean boys. ƒ Good or better overall effectiveness of most schools with a significant reduction of schools below floor targets. ƒ Effective provision for children with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and those at risk of exclusion.

p.4

Enjoying and achieving

ƒ Below national average attainment at all key stages, in line with statistical neighbours. ƒ High numbers of looked after children have missed 25 days of schooling, although the numbers are reducing.

p.4

Making a positive contribution

ƒ Very effective channels for seeking the views of children and young people, and involving them in decisions that affect their lives; particularly the most vulnerable. ƒ Good preventative multi-agency work to support young people, resulting in low levels of young people involved in the youth justice system. ƒ Innovative community based multi-agency

p.4

Making a positive contribution

universal and targeted provision to engage and support young people.

p.5

Achieving economic well-being

ƒ Very high numbers of young people, including young mothers and young offenders, in education, training and employment, and the trend is rising. ƒ Strong 14–19 partnership providing a comprehensive range of opportunities and excellent information, advice and guidance for all young people. ƒ Excellent support for looked after children, care leavers and those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities to help them achieve independence.

p.5

Achieving economic well-being

ƒ Below average number of young people achieving Level 2 qualifications at age 19, although the trend is rising.

p.5

management of children’s services

ƒ Innovative and creative leadership driving improvements in most areas. ƒ Exceptional prioritisation with partners to successfully target key areas of need. ƒ Significant increase in capacity through strengthening front line services and strong partnership working.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion