Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Local authority data pack

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 2
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    −27Mixedmore positive than 34% of reports of this type

    In line with other reports of this type.

    Praiseoutstandingsuccessfulimprovedclearsafe
    Criticismpoorlyinadequatepoorgapsbelowlowerlow

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    Findings positive critical

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No standout praise found.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No next steps set out.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    2
    Words of findings
    656
    shorter than usual (typical 3558)
    Reading level
    Hard
    Flesch 30, typical 50
    Average sentence
    20 words
    Next steps
    0
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    0%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 100%

    Full report text

    Ms Rose Collinson Director of Children's Services Medway Council Gun Wharf Dock Road Chatham Kent ME4 4TR

    p.1

    Children’s services annual rating

    Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).

    p.1

    Children’s services annual rating

    In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.

    p.1

    Children’s services annual rating

    The annual rating derives from a four point scale:

    p.1

    Children’s services annual rating

    4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements

    p.1

    Children’s services annual rating

    Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk

    p.1

    Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)

    Children’s services in Medway Council perform adequately.

    p.2

    Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)

    Performance across schools and day-care settings is mixed. Nurseries mostly perform well although fewer are good or better than seen nationally or in similar areas. The quality of childcare is below similar and national averages and particularly poor for childminder settings, where less than half are good or better. Performance is also below national and similar area averages across primary schools, where only half are good or better. The proportion of good or better schools is satisfactory overall, relative to the position nationally and in similar areas, with three judged outstanding and three inadequate. The overall effectiveness of school sixth forms is better than seen nationally or in similar areas. Provision for children and young people whose circumstances make them vulnerable is successful. All special schools and the pupil referral units are good. One children’s home is satisfactory, and one is good with

    p.2

    Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)

    outstanding features. The local authority fostering and adoption agencies are good as are private fostering arrangements.

    p.2

    Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)

    Performance against national indicators for children’s services, including those for staying safe and enjoying and achieving, is in line with similar areas and national values. Children’s achievement at the end of the foundation stage has improved and was in line with the position nationally and in similar areas in 2007/08. Achievement at age 11 however, is significantly lower than average by similar area and national standards, and significantly fewer young people gain two or more good GCSEs in science subjects at age 16. The proportion of young people who are not in education training or employment is high. Fewer young people from low income families than seen nationally achieve a level 2 qualification by age 19. For level 3 qualifications however, the inequality gap is the same as for comparators.

    p.2

    Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)

    The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.

    p.2

    Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)

    Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA

    p.2

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion