Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bill Wallace

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bill Wallace

  • Postcode verified

    ME4 4TR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongstrengthwell supportedpositivetimelyimprovingclearconsistent
Criticismnot consistentlyat riskdeficienciesinconsistentlackingharmvariablelimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings604w+18
  • What needs to improve145w−79

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
749
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 32, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 19%

Full report text

Mrs Rose Collinson Director of Children’s Services Medway Council Gun Wharf Dock Road Chatham ME4 4TR

p.1

arrangements within Medway Council children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Medway Council which was conducted on 25 and 26 January 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Medway Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Medway Council children’s services

The inspection identified an area of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas of development.

p.1

arrangements within Medway Council children’s services

Most areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in January 2010 have been addressed. Those which remain an area of development are:

p.1

arrangements within Medway Council children’s services

ƒ The assessment and provision of services to meet the cultural, religious and ethnic needs of children and families are not consistently evident in case files.

p.1

arrangements within Medway Council children’s services

ƒ The quality and timeliness of assessments. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

arrangements within Medway Council children’s services

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Social workers are well supported by accessible managers. As a result there is high staff morale and a strong professional commitment to improving outcomes for vulnerable children and families. Furthermore caseloads have become more manageable due to an increase in the number of front line staff.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Social work skills are developed through regular, good quality supervision and appraisal with access to a wide range of training opportunities which are valued highly by staff.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Clear protocols and written guidelines are in place to ensure that statutory requirements to safeguard children and young people are met.

p.2

following areas

ƒ All child protection cases are allocated to suitably qualified and experienced social workers and where children are assessed as being at risk of harm appropriate and prompt action is taken.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Children are routinely seen when their needs are being assessed and in most cases their wishes and feelings are recorded.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The council has implemented a number of changes to develop social work capacity and responsiveness but as yet consistent improvements in service delivery are not evident.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Information provided to the contact, referral and assessment service by the commissioned out-of-hours duty team is accurate and links well with daytime service processes. The council regularly reviews these arrangements.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff workloads are manageable and social workers benefit from recent increased capacity in front line supervisory arrangements.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Thresholds for access to children’s services are well established, understood and applied between partner agencies.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The common assessment framework is well embedded across a wide range of partner agencies which has led to positive outcomes for some children and their families.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Section 47 enquires are thorough and carried out in a timely manner with risks clearly identified and appropriate action taken.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Senior managers scrutinise performance monitoring and audit data. However the impact of this in ensuring timely and good quality assessment remains inconsistent.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ The assessment and provision of services to meet the cultural, religious and ethnic needs of children and families are not consistently evident in case files. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The timeliness of core assessments is below the target set by the council. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The quality and timeliness of assessment is variable with some being too descriptive and lacking sufficient analysis of need .

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The council has identified deficiencies in its electronic social care records which have limited functionality and paper files are also kept to capture critical elements such as management decisions.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Neil Davies, Chief Executive, Medway Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion