Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Bill Wallace
- Postcode verified
ME4 4TR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This was an area for development at the previous inspection. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: Neil Davies, Chief Executive, Medway Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 749
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 32, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Rose Collinson Director of Children’s Services Medway Council Gun Wharf Dock Road Chatham ME4 4TR
p.1
arrangements within Medway Council children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Medway Council which was conducted on 25 and 26 January 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Medway Council children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within Medway Council children’s services
The inspection identified an area of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas of development.
p.1
arrangements within Medway Council children’s services
Most areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in January 2010 have been addressed. Those which remain an area of development are:
p.1
arrangements within Medway Council children’s services
The assessment and provision of services to meet the cultural, religious and ethnic needs of children and families are not consistently evident in case files.
p.1
arrangements within Medway Council children’s services
The quality and timeliness of assessments. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
arrangements within Medway Council children’s services
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
Social workers are well supported by accessible managers. As a result there is high staff morale and a strong professional commitment to improving outcomes for vulnerable children and families. Furthermore caseloads have become more manageable due to an increase in the number of front line staff.
p.2
following areas
Social work skills are developed through regular, good quality supervision and appraisal with access to a wide range of training opportunities which are valued highly by staff.
p.2
following areas
Clear protocols and written guidelines are in place to ensure that statutory requirements to safeguard children and young people are met.
p.2
following areas
All child protection cases are allocated to suitably qualified and experienced social workers and where children are assessed as being at risk of harm appropriate and prompt action is taken.
p.2
following areas
Children are routinely seen when their needs are being assessed and in most cases their wishes and feelings are recorded.
p.2
following areas
The council has implemented a number of changes to develop social work capacity and responsiveness but as yet consistent improvements in service delivery are not evident.
p.2
following areas
Information provided to the contact, referral and assessment service by the commissioned out-of-hours duty team is accurate and links well with daytime service processes. The council regularly reviews these arrangements.
p.2
following areas
Staff workloads are manageable and social workers benefit from recent increased capacity in front line supervisory arrangements.
p.2
following areas
Thresholds for access to children’s services are well established, understood and applied between partner agencies.
p.2
following areas
The common assessment framework is well embedded across a wide range of partner agencies which has led to positive outcomes for some children and their families.
p.2
following areas
Section 47 enquires are thorough and carried out in a timely manner with risks clearly identified and appropriate action taken.
p.2
following areas
Senior managers scrutinise performance monitoring and audit data. However the impact of this in ensuring timely and good quality assessment remains inconsistent.
p.2
Areas for development
The assessment and provision of services to meet the cultural, religious and ethnic needs of children and families are not consistently evident in case files. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
The timeliness of core assessments is below the target set by the council. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
The quality and timeliness of assessment is variable with some being too descriptive and lacking sufficient analysis of need .
p.3
Areas for development
The council has identified deficiencies in its electronic social care records which have limited functionality and paper files are also kept to capture critical elements such as management decisions.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Neil Davies, Chief Executive, Medway Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion