Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Local authority data pack

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    TS1 1EL

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−26Mixedmore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfuleffectivesuccessfullypositivesafestrongstrengthsrobust
Criticisminadequatepoorlyweakerpersistent absenceweaknesstoo manyinsufficientbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1589w−30
  • What needs to improve196w+17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,779
shorter than usual (typical 3558)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 50
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020 7421 6666 Direct F 020 7421 5633 Juliet.Winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms Gill Rollings Executive Director, Children, Families and Learning Middlesbrough Borough Council PO Box 69, Vancouver House Gurney Street, Middlesbrough North Yorkshire TS1 1EL

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

Ofsted guidance published in July 2010 explains that the annual assessment of children’s services is derived from the performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This performance profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the local authority has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant indicators in the National Indicator Set (NIS).

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

In reaching the assessment of children’s services, Ofsted has taken account of all inspected and regulated services for children and young people, arrangements for making sure children are safe and stay safe and performance against national measures. More weight has been given to the outcomes of Ofsted’s inspections and regulatory visits (Blocks A and B in the performance profile).

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

The annual assessment derives from a four point scale:

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, an assessment of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, an assessment of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. As in 2009, while the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s assessment, meeting, or not meeting the minimum requirements alone does not define the grade. The assessment has involved the application of inspector judgement.

p.1

Children’s services assessment Performs adequately (2)

Children’s services in Middlesbrough Borough Council perform adequately.

p.2

Children’s services assessment Performs adequately (2)

Children’s services performed adequately in 2009. This is still the case in 2010 because, despite some improvement in overall performance, there is insufficient good or better provision to meet the minimum requirement for a higher grade. Three of the seven secondary schools are good or better, but three are only satisfactory and one requires significant improvement. One of the three pupil referral units is inadequate. Early years and childcare provision is more adequate than good as is much of the post-16 provision. In contrast, the very large majority of nurseries, primary and special schools are good or better. The sixth forms in schools are good. The fostering and adoption agencies and the local authority children’s home are also good.

p.2

Children’s services assessment Performs adequately (2)

The unannounced inspection of front-line child protection services found much that was at least satisfactory, with some strengths and no areas for priority action.

p.2

Children’s services assessment Performs adequately (2)

National measures of performance show that the large majority of outcomes are in line with those for similar areas or England. Results for 11-year-olds and 16-year- olds are below those of similar areas, although provisional results for 2010 show improvement. In recent years, outcomes by the age of 19 have risen and match those of similar areas, including for young people from low-income families. The proportion of 16- to 18-year-olds not in education, work or training matches those of similar areas. Not all children do as well as they should; in particular, five-year-olds from low-income families and 11-year-olds who have special educational needs do less well than children of the same age in similar areas. Persistent absence in secondary schools is a weakness.

p.2

Children’s services assessment Performs adequately (2)

Key areas for further development ƒ Improve secondary schools so that more are good or better. ƒ Bring adequate provision to good in early years so that children, particularly those from low-income families, get a good start at school. ƒ Reduce persistent absence in secondary schools. ƒ Raise standards for 11-year-olds who have special educational needs.

p.2

Outcomes for children and young people

The very large majority of schools and the children’s homes are good at promoting healthy lifestyles. In primary schools, more children have school lunches. The number of 11-year-olds who are overweight is reducing and more children than in similar areas take part in physical education and sport. The 2008-2011 Children and Young People’s Plan explains clearly how local arrangements encourage children and young people to live healthy lives, focusing on health inequalities across neighbourhoods. The local authority acknowledges that more needs to be done in key areas. For example, a full range of services for those with emotional or mental health difficulties are not yet in place and although not worse than in similar areas, too many 16-year-olds say that they have recently been drunk or taken drugs. Efforts to reduce the number of young women under the age of 18 who become pregnant have been successful.

p.3

Outcomes for children and young people

Arrangements for keeping children and young people safe are almost always good. Inspections show that schools, childminders and colleges are good at this. The local authority recognised that bullying was an issue for many young people and actions taken in partnership with schools, youth centres and other settings have reduced incidents. The inspection of front-line child protection services found that there is a robust action plan in place to address known areas for development and this has ensured improvements in key areas, such as the timely completion of assessments. The arrangements to support children and families where English is not their first language are effective. Recent social care data show satisfactory performance in most areas, although not enough reviews for children in care are completed on time. The Children and Young People’s Plan recognises that domestic violence in the home and parents drinking too much or taking drugs are often the cause of problems for

p.3

Outcomes for children and young people

children. The Families First project aims to consider the needs of the family as a whole and not just the child in need.

p.3

Outcomes for children and young people

Nurseries, most primary schools and four of the seven secondary schools, including the school sixth forms, are good at helping children and young people to do well and enjoy their learning. Most of the special schools, including the special sixth forms, ensure that pupils progress well from their starting point. Ofsted monitoring visits show that the local authority is working effectively to support the two inadequate schools and the inadequate pupil referral unit. Plans are in hand to improve and re- organise provision in the small inadequate sixth form college. Despite the very large majority of good or better primary schools, an above average number do not reach the expected levels and overall results in national tests have been below those of similar authorities for several years. However, the 2010 provisional results for 11- year-olds show improvement. Raising standards at GCSEs is central to the Children

p.3

Outcomes for children and young people

and Young People’s Plan. Although below those of similar areas, GCSE results have risen year-on-year, and significantly in 2010. Secondary schools have successfully improved the educational outcomes of young people with special educational needs and those from low-income families who do as well as similar groups nationally. The local authority recognises that adequate secondary schools require more support to increase the rate of students’ progress. Behaviour is good in most secondary schools but low attendance in some secondary schools affects the students’ educational success.

p.3

Outcomes for children and young people

Almost all schools and the colleges are good at involving young people in making decisions and encouraging them to contribute to their communities. The latest monitoring visit to the weaker pupil referral unit shows that young people who have challenging behaviour are more positive about their learning and exclusions have reduced significantly. The local authority has long-established arrangements for involving children and young people through its Involvement and Communication Strategy. Young people have shown that they are keen to be involved through the Local Democracy Week. The Children and Young People’s Plan identifies the need to involve even more children from specific groups, such as those from minority ethnic communities, disabled children and young people who care for a parent or member of their family. In some areas performance is not improving. Although fewer young people break the law for the first time, too many re-offend. The above-average

p.4

Outcomes for children and young people

proportion of young people being drunk or taking drugs is also a concern. Thorough analysis of local data has shown that alcohol is a key factor to young people committing offences. On a positive note, a high proportion of those who offend are in work, employment or education.

p.4

Outcomes for children and young people

Over several years, tackling poverty, raising aspirations and reducing economic disadvantage have been key priorities in Middlesbrough. Joint efforts between the local authority, schools, employers and other partners have been successful and there has been improvement in most aspects. In all measures of performance, by the age of 19, young people in Middlesbrough do as well as those in similar areas. An increasing number gain good GCSEs, GCE A levels or equivalent qualifications. Outcomes of young people from low-income families are also improving and they do as well as those in similar areas. More families with low income make use of the funding available for childcare. Young people who leave care are helped to find a suitable place to live through the Supporting Lodging Scheme and more than in previous years are in work, education or training. The proportion of 16- to 18-year- olds in education, work or training has been successfully increased. The Children and

p.4

Outcomes for children and young people

Young People’s Plan acknowledges that further support is needed for young people whose circumstances make them vulnerable, in particular young people living in poverty and those who have complex physical, emotional and learning disabilities.

p.4

Prospects for improvement

The majority of outcomes for children and young people are improving in Middlesbrough, however more needs to be done to improve some secondary schools and to reduce the number of young people who are persistently absent from school . In some important areas, improvement has been good. For example, more children start school with better communication, emotional and social development and the target set for achievement at the end of the reception year has been exceeded. The 2008-2011 Children and Young People’s Plan is tackling the right priorities, with strong focus on specific groups of young people who do not achieve enough with initiatives in hotspots where things are not getting better. The Children and Young People’s Plan provides a realistic overview of areas for improvement in health. Ofsted monitoring visits to weaker schools show that the local authority is effective in helping them get better. The inspection of the youth offending service in January

p.4

Prospects for improvement

2010 reported that the service works reasonably well and has good capacity to improve its performance.

p.5

Prospects for improvement

This children’s services assessment is provided in accordance with section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006.

p.5

Prospects for improvement

Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, Children’s Services Assessment

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion