Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Martin Ayres

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Martin Ayres

  • Postcode verified

    E16 2QU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+82Very positivemore positive than 84% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiverobustclearsupportivestrengthseffectivelyskilledtimely
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings649w+78
  • What needs to improve151w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
800
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 24, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 19%

Full report text

Mr K Bromley-Derry Executive Director of Children’s Services London Borough of Newham 1000 Dockside Road London E16 2QU

p.1

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the London Borough of Newham Council which was conducted on 9 and 10 March 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

The inspection identified no areas for priority action but some areas for development, which are detailed below.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for the help and time given during this inspection.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:

p.1

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

ƒ Initial and core assessments include the appropriate contribution of other agencies and professionals and are appropriately signed off by managers who specify actions to be followed.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

ƒ Duty and assessment team managers are visible, supportive and provide effective guidance on case management. They also routinely evaluate Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk the quality of work and use the electronic recording system to monitor contact and referral trends over time and subsequent action.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

ƒ Initial and review conferences are well managed ensuring appropriate decisions in respect of child protection planning. Conference minutes include contingency arrangements in the event of agreed plans not being achieved.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

ƒ Investigations in accordance with Section 47 Children Act 1989 (CA1989) are timely and are appropriately triggered where initial assessments reveal the need for more in-depth investigations.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

ƒ Out of hours emergency duty arrangements are well established and staffed by experienced practitioners. Referral pathways are clear and protocols for transferring work are effective. Responses to children in need who attend accident and emergency units are appropriate.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

ƒ All cases are suitably allocated and social workers receive good quality supervision and support from their managers.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

ƒ Social workers report that they have access to a range of training in safeguarding and child protection.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

ƒ Children are being seen alone and their wishes and feelings are being suitably recorded and acted upon.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

ƒ Services are delivered sensitively in respect of the cultural and religious needs of children and families while maintaining a clear focus on safeguarding.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Newham children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:

p.2

Strengths

ƒ An effective strategy is in place to strengthen the organisation of duty and assessment services leading to demonstrable improvements in the level and consistency of service provision.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Senior managers use performance information effectively to monitor trends and progress against agreed service aims and objectives. Managers are responsive to the high levels of contacts and referrals and are skilled in deploying staff to meet fluctuating demands.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The authority is clearly aware of service challenges and acts promptly to tackle performance issues and to ensure that there is capacity to respond to the high demand for services. ƒ Leadership and management of the duty and assessment service are purposeful and focused well on safeguarding and child protection.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The co-location of the common assessment framework coordinators and Health visitor within the duty and assessment system is increasing joint working opportunities and reflects commitment to good service integration.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Improve the timeliness of both initial and core assessments in order to meet the performance targets set by the council within the Local Area Agreement.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Incorporate a specific section in electronic records to ensure that there is a robust analysis of needs and risks with clear and measurable service decisions and outcomes.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Refine processes to enable information to be automatically transferred across electronic records in order to reduce the current time consuming requirement for social work staff to ‘cut and paste’ information.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Establish more robust arrangements to monitor all police referrals to ensure that cases are not closed without a fully-evidenced and recorded management decision.

p.3

Areas for development

There are no areas for priority action identified through this visit.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Joe Duckworth, Chief Executive, Newham Kamini Rambellas, Independent Chair of Newham Safeguarding Children Board Quintin Peppiatt, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Newham Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion