Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Karen McKeown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Karen McKeown

  • Postcode verified

    BS23 1UJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+4Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivestrongtimelyhigh qualitystrengthstrengthsclearly
Criticismconcernsseriousfaillackdelaysvariablenot consistentlynot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings601w+58
  • What needs to improve188w−83

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
789
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 27, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%What needs to improve 24%

Full report text

Ms Sheila Smith Director of Children’s Services North Somerset Council Town Hall Walliscote Grove Road Weston-super-Mare BS23 1UJ

p.1

arrangements within North Somerset children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in North Somerset Council which was conducted on 11 and 12 May 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within North Somerset children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within North Somerset children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and satisfactory practice, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within North Somerset children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Child protection investigations that are undertaken in accordance with the Section 47 Children Act 1989 are managed effectively. Strong working relationships with the police result in timely and high quality investigations with good management oversight and decision-making. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ The effective implementation of multi-agency locality teams, the common assessment framework and the ‘Team around the Child’ approach ensure timely and appropriate plans are made to provide resources to children and young people requiring additional support.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Lessons from serious case reviews are disseminated well to all relevant staff through a series of events and workshops organised by the Local Safeguarding Children Board. This has led to improvements in practice with regard to recording on case files and ensuring that children are seen alone when undertaking an assessment of their needs.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Case file audits are used effectively to monitor and improve the quality of services provided by the referral and assessment team. As part of a well- established audit plan, senior managers undertake monthly audits of case files. Identified practice strengths and areas for improvement are then shared with staff through regular management briefings.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Thresholds for access to children’s social care services are well understood and operate effectively across partner agencies.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Effective administrative systems are in place to ensure that contacts and referrals are clearly recorded and promptly sent through to the appropriate manager.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ All children and young people who require assessment are allocated to suitably qualified and experienced social workers.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Staff are highly motivated and are supported well by regular supervision and training. Newly qualified staff receive appropriate additional support from managers and undertake the national Newly Qualified Social Worker development programme.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Children are seen regularly and, where appropriate, alone. Social workers use age-appropriate methods to communicate with children and ensure that their views are accurately recorded and reflected in assessments.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Case recording is comprehensive and, in most cases, timely.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Consultation is undertaken with service users to ascertain their views of the services provided and action plans are in place to address relevant findings.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Well established information-sharing between the emergency duty team and the referral and assessment team ensures that concerns about children and young people are followed up appropriately.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Due to a shortage of staff in long term teams, protocols for the transfer of cases are not used consistently which results in some children and young people not receiving a timely service.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The lack of effective tracking and monitoring by first line managers in a small number of cases, where child protection concerns have not been identified, has led to delays in assessment or in the delivery of services.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The quality of initial and core assessment is variable although recent training initiatives are beginning to show an improvement. However, some still fail to show sufficient analysis of the key factors impacting on the child’s well-being.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The proportionately low rate of referral and contacts in relation to families which come from minority ethnic backgrounds has not been sufficiently analysed.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Graham Turner, Chief Executive, North Somerset Council Philip Durban, Chair of North Somerset Safeguarding Children Board Cllr Jeremy Blatchford, Lead Member for Children’s Services, North Somerset Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion