Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
OL1 1XJ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There are some weaknesses in enjoying and achieving which relate to the relative poor outcomes for some groups of young people from the Black and Asian communities. p.2
- Achievement in secondary schools is judged by inspectors to be satisfactory but the support for achieving economic well-being is inadequate. p.2
- Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 639
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 30, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Michael Jameson Executive Director: People, Communities and Society Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council Level 10 Civic Centre West Street Oldham OL1 1XJ
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Children’s services in Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council perform well.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
The overall effectiveness of a large majority of inspected and regulated services and settings is good or better. A higher than average proportion of both primary and nursery schools is good or outstanding and none are inadequate. However, a fewer proportion of secondary schools is good or better and there is too much provision which is judged to be only satisfactory. Achievement in secondary schools is judged by inspectors to be satisfactory but the support for achieving economic well-being is inadequate. The performance of the local authority’s fostering and adoption agencies is outstanding and the children’s home is good. The provision for very young children is more mixed. Overall, the proportion of childminding that is good or better is below the national average and non-domestic childcare is satisfactory. The joint area review in January 2009 judged safeguarding and the provision for looked after
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
children to be good. There have been no serious case reviews since December 2008.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
A very large majority of the national indicators, including those for enjoying and achieving and staying safe, show performance which is as good as or better than similar areas and national averages. Performance is particularly good in terms of the staying safe indicators.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Outcomes are less good for some young people whose circumstances make them vulnerable. There are some weaknesses in enjoying and achieving which relate to the relative poor outcomes for some groups of young people from the Black and Asian communities. In addition, a smaller number of looked after young people are in education, training or employment and they achieve less well at Key Stage 2.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion