Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors under review

    Readings disagree

  • Postcode verified

    PL1 2EW

Page 1 of 42
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−52Criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseclearclearlycaringrobustsafeeffectivelywell supportedoutstanding
Criticismlimitedlackfailureseriouspoorconcernsconcernnot met

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings4880w−46
  • What needs to improve1640w−71

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
42
Words of findings
6,388
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%What needs to improve 23%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Commission for Social Care Inspection

Launched in April 2004, the Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) is the single inspectorate for social care in England.

p.2

Commission for Social Care Inspection

The Commission combines the work formerly done by the Social Services Inspectorate (SSI), the SSI/Audit Commission Joint Review Team and the National Care Standards Commission.

p.2

The role of CSCI is to:

• Promote improvement in social care • Inspect all social care - for adults and children - in the public, private and voluntary sectors • Publish annual reports to Parliament on the performance of social care and on the state of the social care market • Inspect and assess ‘Value for Money’ of council social services • Hold performance statistics on social care • Publish the ‘star ratings’ for council social services • Register and inspect services against national standards • Host the Children’s Rights Director role.

p.2

Inspection Methods & Findings

SECTION B of this report summarises key findings and evidence from this inspection. The following 4-point scale is used to indicate the extent to which standards have been met or not met by placing the assessed level alongside the phrase "Standard met?"

p.2

The 4-point scale ranges from:

4 - Standard Exceeded (Commendable) 3 - Standard Met (No Shortfalls) 2 - Standard Almost Met (Minor Shortfalls) 1 - Standard Not Met (Major Shortfalls) 'O' or blank in the 'Standard met?' box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion. '9' in the 'Standard met?' box denotes standard not applicable. 'X' is used where a percentage value or numerical value is not applicable. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 1

p.2

Name of Authority

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency

p.3

Date of first registration Date of latest registration certificate

Date of last inspection N/A Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 2 Date of Inspection Visit 16th March 2004 ID Code

p.3

Date of first registration Date of latest registration certificate

Name of Inspector 1 Michelle Oxley 075420

p.4

inspections and bring a different

perspective to the inspection process. Name of Specialist (e.g.

p.4

the time of inspection

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 3

p.5

D.3. Provider’s agreement

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 4

p.6

INTRODUCTION TO REPORT AND INSPECTION

Independent and local authority fostering services which fall within the jurisdiction of the National Care Standards Commission (NCSC) are subject to inspection, to establish if the service is meeting the National Minimum Standards for Fostering Services and the requirements of the Care Standards Act 2000, the Fostering Services Regulations 2002 and the Children Act 1989 as amended.

p.6

INTRODUCTION TO REPORT AND INSPECTION

This document summarises the inspection findings of the NCSC in respect of Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency. The inspection findings relate to the National Minimum Standards for Fostering Services published by the Secretary of State under sections 23 and 49 of the Care Standards Act 2000, for independent and local authority fostering services respectively.

p.6

INTRODUCTION TO REPORT AND INSPECTION

The Fostering Services Regulations 2002 are secondary legislation, with which a service provider must comply. Service providers are expected to comply fully with the National Minimum Standards. The National Minimum standards will form the basis for judgements by the NCSC in relation to independent fostering agencies regarding registration, the imposition and variation of registration conditions and any enforcement action, and in relation to local authority fostering services regarding notices to the local authority and reports to the Secretary of State under section 47 of the Care Standards Act 2000. The report follows the format of the National Minimum Standards and the numbering shown in the report corresponds to that of the standards.

p.6

INTRODUCTION TO REPORT AND INSPECTION

The report will show the following: • Inspection methods used • Key findings and evidence • Overall ratings in relation to the standards • Compliance with the Regulations • Notifications to the Local Authority and Reports to the Secretary of State • Required actions on the part of the provider • Recommended good practice • Summary of the findings • Report of the Lay Assessor (where relevant) • Providers response and proposed action plan to address findings

p.6

INSPECTION VISITS

Inspections will be undertaken in line with the agreed regulatory framework with additional visits as required. This is in accordance with the provisions of the Care Standards Act 2000. The following inspection methods have been used in the production of this report. The report represents the inspector's findings from the evidence found at the specified inspection dates. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES PROVIDED. Plymouth City Council is a Unitary Authority in Devon. The Foster Care Service is a part of Children’s service provision within the city. At the time of the inspection the Plymouth Foster service provided placements for 142 children. The day-to-day management of the service was undertaken by 3 team Managers and overseen by the head of Children’s services. The team had responsibility for recruitment selection, training and support of all the cities foster

p.6

INSPECTION VISITS

carers Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 6

p.7

Inspector’s Summary

(This is an overview of the inspector’s findings, which includes good practice, quality issues, areas to be addressed or developed and any other concerns.)

p.8

Inspector’s Summary

This was the Plymouth City Foster Care Services first Inspection against National Minimum Standards. This inspection was conducted over a period of 1 month and was carried out by 3 inspectors. As part of the inspection, foster cares, parents and children were surveyed. The survey responses from foster cares was particularly low, this was disappointing. A selection of foster carers and children interviewed. Selected staff and Mangers working for the service were interviewed and policy documents, documentation to support the care systems were examined, case tracking of 4 children was undertaken 2 inspectors observed a panel meeting.

p.8

Inspector’s Summary

We would like to acknowledge the assistance provided in undertaking this inspection particularly from staff throughout the team who responded positively to this inspection. We would also like to thank young people families and carers for their time and their participation

p.8

Inspector’s Summary

The purpose of the inspection was to assess the foster care services effectiveness in terms of meeting the need of the children and young people using the service; against National Minimum Standards

p.8

Inspector’s Summary

The overall assessment following this inspection was that:

p.8

Inspector’s Summary

1.Social Service as a whole and the foster care service were undergoing a period of significant change, which impacted upon this inspection. At the time of this inspection and as part of a strategic plan for Children’s Services as a whole, the foster care service was about to undergo restructure. The plan was for the team to split in to 2 separate teams providing and specialising in, either fostering or adoption.

p.8

Inspector’s Summary

2.The service Manager had provided the Inspection team with the required policy documentation and documentation to support some care practices prior to the inspection. This indicated a willingness work toward meeting National Minimum Standards.

p.8

Inspector’s Summary

3. Pre Inspection discussions with the Head of Children’s service established that there was an acknowledgement and an awareness that much work would be required to ensure that the service operated in line with minimum standards in the future and that a strategy for the future was being developed Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 7 4.The service lacked structure. The approach to providing care was informal rather than being based on a clearly defined framework and this is evident through examination of files and discussion with foster carers and link workers. There was little or no evidence that the systems to support and verify the actions and approach of staff were in place and that the service relied primarily on the knowledge and informal approaches of team members

p.8

Inspector’s Summary

5.There was little evidence that systems were in place to ensure that the views of children were heard either directly, through an advocacy service or through the services own complaints procedure

p.9

Inspector’s Summary

6.A significant number of foster carers reported a feeling of isolation and said they lacked support. This was attributed to shortages in staffing within the service

p.9

Inspector’s Summary

7.The procedures of the panel were not robust in that approvals were made before all information was available to them. The quality of social work reports to panel was varied in terms of quality. Cases brought to panel were reported to be well over due and this was evidence through observation of panel

p.9

Inspector’s Summary

8. It is acknowledged that the inspection took place during a time of turbulence. It is envisaged that the service will be better placed at the next inspection to set out its vision for the future

p.9

Inspector’s Summary

9.Three of four foster care files examined were over numbers ( had more children than were approved for by panel.) There was no evidence on file of a return to panel, exemption certificate, assessment by senior Manager or report summarizing the events

p.9

Inspector’s Summary

10. 49 Young Person questionnaire were returned. 71% of these felt that the fostering service consulted them 77% felt that the complaints process had been explained to them, 61% had received a young persons guide. 24% reported being seen alone by their social worker 59% sometimes being seen alone and 16%said that they were never seen alone by the social worker. None of the questionnaires returned from young people reported bullying although the questionnaires did not explicitly ask this

p.9

Inspector’s Summary

11.27 foster care questionnaire were returned 40% felt satisfied with the support received from the service, 59%felt they were kept informed of issue effecting the young person, 66% felt consulted about decisions being made regarding the young person, 88% had received information on making complaints. 60% felt that they did not receive information about the young persons background. 88% felt that the service was under staffed. 51% felt that their opinions were not sought by the fostering service.

p.9

Inspector’s Summary

It must be noted that whilst some figures reflect some degree of support experience by foster carers the narrative on the questionnaire frequently contradicted the “YES” in the box. It must also be acknowledged that unfortunately only a small number of young person and foster carer questionnaires were returned to the inspection team. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 8 Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 9

p.9

(Local Authority Fostering Services Only)

The following statutory Reports or Notifications are to be made under the Care Standards Act as a result of the findings of this inspection:

p.11

(Local Authority Fostering Services Only)

NO Report to the Secretary of State under section 47(3) of the Care Standards Act 2000 that the Commission considers the Local Authority's fostering service satisfies the regulatory requirements:

p.11

(Local Authority Fostering Services Only)

NO Notice to the Local Authority under section 47(5) of the Care Standards Act 2000 of failure(s) to satisfy regulatory requirements in their fostering service which are not substantial, and specifying the action the Commission considers the Authority should take to remedy the failure(s), informing the Secretary of State of that Notice: NO Report to the Secretary of State under section 47(4)(a) of the Care Standards Act of a failure by a Local Authority fostering service to satisfy regulatory requirements which is not considered substantial:

p.11

(Local Authority Fostering Services Only)

NO Report to the Secretary of State under section 47(1) of the Care Standards Act 2000 of substantial failure to satisfy regulatory requirements by a Local Authority fostering service:

p.11

The grounds for the above Report or Notice are:

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 10

p.12

Implementation of Statutory Requirements from Last Inspection

Requirements from last Inspection visit fully actioned? NA

p.12

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

Identified below are areas not addressed from the last inspection report which indicate a non-compliance with the Care Standards Act 2000 and Fostering Services Regulations 2002. No. Regulation Standard Required actions Timescale for action

p.12

Action is being taken by the National Care Standards Commission to monitor

compliance with the above requirements. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 11

p.12

registration are listed below, with the inspector's assessment of compliance from

the evidence at the time of this inspection.

p.13

Date

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 12

p.14

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED DURING THIS INSPECTION

Action Plan: The appropriate Officer of the Local Authority or the Registered Person (as applicable) is requested to provide the Commission with an Action Plan, which indicates how requirements and recommendations are to be addressed. This action plan will be made available on request to the Area Office.

p.14

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

Identified below are areas addressed in the main body of the report which indicate non- compliance with the Care Standards Act 2000, the Children Act 1989, the Fostering Services Regulations 2002, or the National Minimum Standards for Fostering Services. The Authority or Registered Person(s) is/are required to comply within the given time scales in order to comply with the Regulatory Requirements for fostering services. No. Regulation Standard * Requirement Timescale for action

p.14

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

1 3,4 FS1 The Statement of Purpose must reflect the actual service provided and any changes made. The children’s guide must be a “ child friendly” document, it must include information about how to access advocacy services 31/12/04

p.14

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

2 29 FS6 Formalised systems to record and ensure that 1: premises used by foster cares are suitable and fit and 2: children are transported safely, must be devised and implemented. These systems must reflect dates name of worker and date for review 31/12/04

p.14

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

3 33,34 FS8 Evidence of how children were matched to children must be provided. The matching process must involve children, parents, carers and other professionals and provide evidence that this has occurred 31/12/04

p.14

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

4 12 FS9 There must be a system to record, collate and evaluate the circumstances, numbers and outcomes of all allegations of abuse and neglect. Every foster home must be provided with a policy regarding safe caring 31/12/04

p.14

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

5 11 FS11 A system for ensuring that children are consulted and their views heard and accounted for must be devised 31/12/04 Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 13 6 18 FS11 Children must be given direct access to the foster care services complaint processes, this must include information about advocacy services 31/12/04

p.14

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

7 15 FS12 A system ensuring health needs are assessed and monitored must be implemented. Foster cares must be provided with information about health needs of children on every occasion 31/12/04

p.15

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

8 16 FS13 Details of educational provision to meet the needs for each child must be clearly recorded 31/12/04

p.15

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

9 21 FS19 A formalised system of training for staff must be established in line with this standard 31/12/04

p.15

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

10 29,30 FS21 A clear strategy must be devised to combat the feeling of isolation expressed by foster carers 31/12/04

p.15

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

11 29 FS22 Foster care agreements must be up to date and provide clear accurate information 31/12/04

p.15

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

12 22 FS24 Children’s files must contain up to date information relevant to the needs and circumstances of each child 31/12/04

p.15

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

13 30, FS25 Foster carers files must contain up to date and relevant information including young persons care plan , young persons core assessment, details of all young people placed, panel minutes, review minutes, approval documentation, payment details and contact log 31/12/04

p.15

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

14 30 FS29 A system must be devised to ensure that payments to foster carers are not significantly delayed 31/12/04 Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 14 27,28,29, FS30 The panel must first obtain completed assessments, all references and ensure each carer has been comprehensively vetted prior to being approved. Placements must only be approved where thorough, contemporary and comprehensive information is available. Decisions regarding the continuation of placements must be made with in a reasonable time scale. These must be brought to panel at the earliest opportunity so that the time the child has already spent in the placement is not the over ridding factor in the decision making process. 31/12/04

p.15

GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION

Identified below are areas addressed in the main body of the report which relate to the National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice issues which should be considered for implementation by the Authority or Registered Person(s). No. Refer to Standard * Recommendation Action

p.16

GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION

1 FS7 Carers should be recruited from a variety of diverse backgrounds and documentation provided to carers should be produced in a variety of accessible formats

p.16

GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION

2 FS10 Evidence that the arrangements for contact are monitored and reviewed should be provided

p.16

GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION

3 FS14 Foster carers must be provided with sufficient information regarding the facilitation of the transition to independent living and there should be evidence that children have been consulted as part of this process.

p.16

GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION

4 FS17 The deficits in staff numbers should be addressed staff should receive training regarding children who have disabilities

p.16

GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION

5 FS18 The level of support given to all staff and carers should be increased

p.16

GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION

6 FS23 The service should ensure that all carers attend training provided and particularly specific training related to the needs of individual children

p.16

GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION

* Note: You may refer to the relevant standard in the remainder of the report by omitting the 2-letter prefix e.g FS10 refers to Standard 10.

p.16

PART B INSPECTION METHODS & FINDINGS

The following inspection methods have been used in the production of this report Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 15 Number of Inspector days spent 9

p.16

PART B INSPECTION METHODS & FINDINGS

Survey of placing authorities NO Foster carer survey YES Foster children survey YES Checks with other organisations and Individuals YES • Directors of Social services NO • Child protection officer NO • Specialist advisor (s) NO • Local Foster Care Association NO Tracking Individual welfare arrangements YES • Interview with children YES • Interview with foster carers YES • Interview with agency staff YES • Contact with parents YES • Contact with supervising social workers YES • Examination of files YES Individual interview with manager YES Information from provider YES Individual interviews with key staff YES Group discussion with staff NO Interview with panel chair NO Observation of foster carer training NO Observation of foster panel YES Inspection of policy/practice documents YES Inspection of records YES Interview with individual child YES

p.17

PART B INSPECTION METHODS & FINDINGS

Date of Inspection 16/03/04 Time of Inspection 9.30 Duration Of Inspection (hrs) 70 Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 16 The following pages summarise the key findings and evidence from this inspection, together with the NCSC assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards have been met. The following scale is used to indicate the extent to which standards have been met or not met by placing the assessed level alongside the phrase "Standard met?"

p.17

PART B INSPECTION METHODS & FINDINGS

The scale ranges from: 4 - Standard Exceeded (Commendable) 3 - Standard Met (No Shortfalls) 2 - Standard Almost Met (Minor Shortfalls) 1 - Standard Not Met (Major Shortfalls)

p.18

PART B INSPECTION METHODS & FINDINGS

"0" in the "Standard met?" box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion. "9" in the "Standard met?" box denotes standard not applicable. “X” is used where a percentage value or numerical value is not applicable. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 17

p.18

The intended outcome for the following standard is:

• There is clear statement of the aims and objectives of the fostering service and the fostering service ensures that they meet those aims and objectives.

p.19

There is a clear statement of the aims and objectives of the fostering service and of

what facilities and services they provide. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 The Statement of Purpose required amending to reflect proposed changes in the organisation which were planned including changes in staffing which have occurred following this inspection The children’s guide was not a child friendly document and omitted information about accessing advocacy service Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 18

p.19

The intended outcomes for the following set of standards are:

• The fostering service is provided and managed by those with the appropriate

p.20

work efficiently and effectively and have the necessary knowledge and experience of

childcare and fostering to do so in a professional manner. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 At the time of this inspection a team of 3 Managers managed the fostering service. The Managers said that the Management team possessed qualifications relevant to the role and each had considerable experience of work with children as well as working within fostering and adoption teams and held professional social work qualifications. This was verified in the Statement of purpose

p.20

Any persons carrying on or managing the fostering service are suitable people to run

a business concerned with safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 9 Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 19

p.20

The intended outcomes for the following set of standards are:

• The fostering service is managed ethically and efficiently, delivering a good quality foster care service and avoiding confusion and conflicts of role.

p.21

There are clear procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the

fostering service and ensuring quality performance. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The Manager said that as part of a quality review process, the service seeks feed back from foster carers annually. Foster care questionnaires confirmed this, although a proportion of respondents indicated that they were somewhat dissatisfied with response times, lack of support and lack of reaction to issues of concern. The roles of managers and staff were laid out in the statement of Purpose and both staff and foster carers were clear about lines of responsibility and optimistic about future changes to the structure

p.21

There are clear procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the

Number of statutory notifications made to NCSC in last 12 months: 0

p.21

There are clear procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the

Death of a child placed with foster parents. 0

p.21

Referral to Secretary of State of a person working for the service as

unsuitable to work with children. Serious illness or accident of a child. 0 Outbreak of serious infectious disease at a foster home. 0 Actual or suspected involvement of a child in prostitution. 0

p.21

Serious incident relating to a foster child involving calling the police to a

foster home. Serious complaint about a foster parent. 7 Initiation of child protection enquiry involving a child. 0

p.21

Serious incident relating to a foster child involving calling the police to a

Number of complaints made to NCSC about the agency in the past 12 months: 0 Number of the above complaints which were substantiated: 0

p.21

Standard 5 (5.1 - 5.4)

The fostering service is managed effectively and efficiently. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The Managers job description was seen. Lines of delegation, accountability and responsibility were clear to staff and foster carers who were spoken to confirmed this to be the case Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 20

p.21

The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:

• The fostering service promotes and safeguards the child/young person's physical, mental and emotional welfare.

p.22

The fostering service makes available foster carers who provide a safe, healthy and

nurturing environment. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 Link workers said that they inspected the premises on an annual basis and that this was an informal procedure. No evidence could be found to confirm this on the foster carers file. No evidence of risk assessment in terms of premises was found. Although files indicated that the premises were inspected at the point of the foster carers application a formalised system for the continual monitoring of premise in relation to health, safety and suitability could not be evidenced. The training plan and responses from foster carers confirmed that preparation and training covered health and safety issues. A formalised system for ensuring the safe transportation of children by foster carers could not be evidenced.

p.22

The fostering service ensures that children and young people, and their families, are

provided with foster care services which value diversity and promote equality. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 Discussions with both staff, management and foster carers revealed that whilst the fostering service is aware that the majority of foster carers are White British, there is an increasing need to recruit significantly more carers from alternative ethnic backgrounds. Staff spoke of difficulty in recruitment. Campaigns to target future carers from diverse backgrounds appear to be on-going. All staff spoken with felt that the approval process is good and not discriminating and were pleased to have approved carers irrespective of their sexuality, disability and cultural background. Staff and carers stated that documents can be translated for non-English speaking carers or children. However, there did not appear to be a base of documents already translated into other languages that are known to be spoken within the Plymouth area already.

p.22

The fostering service ensures that children and young people, and their families, are

It was noted that all staff and carers spoken with were of White/British origin. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 21

p.22

carers only if they represent appropriate matches for a child for whom a local

authority is seeking a carer. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 Discussion with link workers and managers confirmed that process of matching children to carers was primarily undertaken at the weekly team meeting. This involved discussion around the skills of the carers which were known to the team and by the information including the core assessment and information regarding a Childs ethnic, religious, cultural and linguistic needs, collected at the point of referral. Discussions verified that the child, parent, carers and other relevant professionals were not involved directly in this process. Although link workers were clear that the positive relations existed with other professionals and that there was a culture of cooperation and information sharing. However, specific written information regarding the elements which were taken into consideration when agreeing the placement could not be evidenced.

p.23

The fostering service protects each child or young person from all forms of abuse,

neglect, exploitation and deprivation. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 The training plan provided stated that foster carers initially completed a total of 11 weeks training and that this included safe caring, managing behaviour and recognition of abuse. This was confirmed by foster carers and link workers. A written policy on safe caring was not evidenced. The foster service had received 0 reports of bullying however, there were no clear systems for collecting such information The Manager said that systems were being developed to collate and evaluate information about allegations but could not be evidenced at the time of inspection. Foster carer files examined did not document frequent and consistent communication between link worker and young persons social worker in between LAC reviews.

p.23

being bullied:

X % Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 22

p.23

encouraged to maintain and develop family contacts and friendships as set out in

her/his care plan and/or foster placement agreement. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 The arrangements for contact were discussed and summarised at the Foster carers reviews, however, many minutes of annual reviews were either missing or had not taken place. Link workers saw contact as part of the matching process and emphasised the relevance of ensuring potential foster carers could meet contact arrangements. Contact was included in the 11 week training received by carers. Link workers said that they would informally monitor contact arrangements and provide support where required. The majority of responses from foster carers indicated that they felt supported by the link worker in this area.

p.24

others significant to the child, are sought over all issues that are likely to affect their

daily life and their future. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 The training plan included information about listening to views, a video was also used in the introductory part of the course to stress the importance of listening to children. Link workers said that children were always given information from the reviewing officer about how to complain, however the complaint system provided to children directly from the service was not clear and it appeared that the Childs social worker was seen as responsible for ascertaining and recording the views of children. In discussions with both managers and link workers and from documentary evidence it became clear that the fostering service does not have any formal or informal systems for seeking the views of children they have placed. The single method of communication appears to be that the child’s social worker seeks views and would presumably feedback to

p.24

others significant to the child, are sought over all issues that are likely to affect their

the fostering team any issues. However, up to date LAC review minutes could not be found on some files sampled in order to capture this information and no formal lines of communication could be evidenced between social workers and link workers. The fostering service could not evidence any attempt to seek the young persons or carers views in the form of questionnaires. Many foster carer and young person questionnaires that were returned to the inspection team, raised the fact that they were not consulted on issues specific to the placement or on process, procedure and practice. 14 young people stated that the foster service had not made contact with them. The fostering service was unable to evidence that children knew how to raise concerns or complaints directly. 11 young people stated that they did not know how to complain As a result the fostering service appears to have no overall mechanism for monitoring

p.24

others significant to the child, are sought over all issues that are likely to affect their

outcomes, the success or achievements of their service from the young people they place. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 23

p.24

training appropriate to her/his age and understanding to enable informed participation

in decisions about her/his health needs. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 Foster carer training included the importance of health and development. Link workers said that health needs and diet would be monitored as part of their role, however there was no formal system for recording that this had been done. There was no evidence that a written health records had been provided to each carer for each child and that this had been monitored and updated throughout the placement.

p.25

child or young person in foster care and ensures that she/he is encouraged to attain

her/his full potential. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 Whilst link workers and foster carers acknowledged that child care planning incorporated educational needs this could not be verified as there was no documentation to confirm that educational provision had been considered in files examined

p.25

The fostering service ensures that their foster care services help to develop skills,

competence and knowledge necessary for adult living. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 Training for foster carers included promoting independence. Discussions indicated that a leaving care worker would be allocated to the child. There was no clear written requirement of what was expected of foster carers in terms of preparing children for independent living or specific training provided to carers. There was no evidence to demonstrate that young people preparing for leaving care were involved in decision making processes. The selected file sample did not include children of leaving care age on this occasion Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 24

p.25

The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:

• The people who work in or for the fostering service are suitable to work with

p.26

number of staff and carers and their range of qualifications and experience are

sufficient to achieve the purposes and functions of the organisation.

p.26

Any people working in or for the fostering service are suitable people to work with

children and young people and to safeguard and promote their welfare. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 Recruitment and selection procedures were examined these followed Plymouth City council procedures and met this standard. All social work staff were qualified and had varying levels of experience. The Manager said that the staff team was stable and staff confirmed that turnover was low although training opportunities for staff appeared to be minimal from what staff reported

p.26

Staff are organised and managed in a way that delivers an efficient and effective

foster care service. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 Staff said that they were well supported and received supervision in line with this standard. Staff and Managers clarified that there was a backlog of assessment awaiting processing and that it was envisaged that this would be addressed when the service re-structures Staff and foster carers reported large case loads and link workers were difficult to access due to heavy case loads. Foster care reviews were infrequent and minutes for those completed contained limited information Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 25

p.26

qualified staff and recruits a range of carers to meet the needs of children and young

people for whom it aims to provide a service. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 Discussions indicated that the staff team were suitably qualified and experienced in their field of work. The general feeling from foster carers and the team was that at the time of this inspection, the service was not sufficiently staffed to meet the demands placed upon it. There were plans for future expansion to include specific groups and develop specialist services. Evidence of link workers who have high caseloads and are under-resourced, was further compounded by infrequent visits to carers, missing annual reviews etc. It was noted at the inspection that staff and foster carers skills and experience with regard to children with disabilities is very limited and this clearly needs to be addressed through training provision.

p.27

The fostering service is a fair and competent employer, with sound employment

practices and good support for its staff and carers. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 Whilst the fostering service appears largely to be a fair and competent employer, the lack of formalised and documented carer supervision, link worker visits to the carers home and carers expressing difficulty in accessing support, the service has to improve on these areas in order to meet the standard. Support to both staff and carers needs to be prioritised.

p.27

There is a good quality training programme to enhance individual skills and to keep

staff up-to-date with professional and legal developments. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 Discussions with managers and staff established that staff induction consisted mostly of joint working. Some training was available to staff but this was limited due to financial constraints. A formalised induction and ongoing training programme for staff could not be evidenced at the inspection. Evidence was seen through file sampling, that some partners of primary foster carers had decided to ‘opt out’ of attending care training and this appears, from documentation to have been left unaddressed and unchallenged. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 26

p.27

Standard 20 (20.1 - 20.5)

All staff are properly accountable and supported. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 Staff confirmed that supervision took place monthly and that this was recorded. Staff spoken to said that they felt well supported by managers. An appraisal system was also in place for staff. This was operated on an annual basis. Staff meetings took place every 2 weeks for all staff these were chaired by the Manager, minuets were seen.

p.28

Standard 21 (21.1 - 21.6)

The fostering service has a clear strategy for working with and supporting carers. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 Feedback from foster carer questionnaires was mixed – whilst several carers felt well supported, the majority reported poor access to training, infrequent contact from link workers, lack of respite arrangements and out of hours support. Unallocated cases in district teams added to their feeling of isolation and frustration. Some support groups have been established, with link workers acting as facilitator for most. Attendance for these varies and the issues appear to be centred upon payments, limited support as well as poor contact from social workers in the district teams and unallocated cases. There was no clear strategy to address these issues beyond the proposed reorganisation

p.28

The fostering service is a managed one that provides supervision for foster carers

and helps them to develop their skills. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 Foster care agreements seen were out of date, contained limited information and proved difficult for the link worker to adequately monitor the competence of each foster care and ultimately the appropriateness of each placement. Foster carers reported a lack of clarity around foster carer agreements and the purpose. Evidence of ongoing assessment of each foster carer by their link worker could not be provided. Link workers spoken with confirmed this was done “ informally”. No risk assessment, young person care plans or core assessments could be found on the files, examined. It is therefore hard to see against what both the foster care and in turn link worker, judged their performance on and ultimately the service they provide. This fact was compounded by reportedly little attempt to seek opinions from carers and no attempt to seek

p.28

The fostering service is a managed one that provides supervision for foster carers

opinions from the young people Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 27

p.28

provide high quality care and meet the needs of each child/young person placed in

their care. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 Evidence was found, through file sampling, of both good and poor attendance on training. Some carers appeared not to have attended care training despite having been registered for several years. There was evidence, specifically of male carers not attending training. Evidence was found where children had been placed who had very specific needs, that carers had no experience/knowledge of and no record of training provided or identified as needed. Examples of these were found for children with medical conditions, or behavioural difficulties. This also raised queries about the validity and accuracy of the matching process. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 28

p.29

The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:

• All appropriate records are kept and are accessible in relation to the fostering services and the individual foster carers and foster children.

p.30

maintained for each child or young person in foster care which details the nature and

quality of care provided and contributes to an understanding of her/his life events.

p.30

Relevant information from the case records is made available to the child and to

anyone involved in her/his care. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 Of files sampled at the inspection, no details (beyond name and age) of each child placed could be evidenced. Files lacked up to date placement plans, no core assessment, care plans, LAC reviews, other professional’s reports and limited LAC reviews. Clearly the nature of the placement, purpose, length and circumstances could not be found and raises concerns as to what the link worker can monitor each carer against if they do not know what each child’s’ needs are or what is needed from the placement. Records regarding each child placed appear to be kept solely by the district social worker. Clearly this practice is of significant concern and leaves both carers and link workers in a vulnerable position.

p.30

The fostering service's administrative records contain all significant information

relevant to the running of the foster care service and as required by regulations. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 Files sampled were incomplete and difficult to glean information from. Files did not contain a record of training attended, of the matching process, minutes of panel, dates of children being placed, on-going LAC reviews. Foster carer reviews between 1996 and 2001 were missing on all files except one. One carer appeared not to have had a review since 1999, another since 2001 and another since 2000. No care plans or placement planning meeting minutes could be located on files sampled. Some documents were found to be unsigned and undated. Records of carers approval numbers being increased were found without any apparent re- assessment, return to panel or other documentary evidence to support this. Three of the four foster carer files sampled in detail were all over numbers i.e. had more

p.30

The fostering service's administrative records contain all significant information

children than they are approved for. There were no exemption certificates in place and absolutely nothing on file to acknowledge this fact or to record discussions between foster carers and link workers. Clearly this is of significant concern, given the limited number of files examined in detail there may be a much larger proportion of foster carers who are over numbers Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 29 Number of current foster placements supported by the agency: 147 Number of placements made by the agency in the last 12 months: 9

p.30

months:

Number of new foster carers approved during the last 12 months: 9 Number of foster carers who left the agency during the last 12 months: 9

p.31

Maximum £

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 30

p.32

The intended outcome for the following standard is:

• The premises used as offices by the fostering service are suitable for the purpose.

p.32

Standard 26 (26.1 - 26.5)

Premises used as offices by the fostering service are appropriate for the purpose. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 The premises used as offices by the fostering team are clearly very cramped, noisy and busy. This issue was identified by both managers and link workers alike. However, this is likely to be remedied in that the ‘new’ fostering team will move to Douglas House with ‘adoption’ remaining at the current premises. Evidence was seen of robust IT and communication systems, however whilst files are predominantly retained in cabinets – it was noted during the inspection that confidential documentation was left unsecured and lying on desks awaiting attention. The building does have a robust security system and inspectors’ identification was checked and verified on several occasions. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 31

p.32

The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:

• The agency fostering services are financially viable and appropriate and timely payments are made to foster carers.

p.33

The agency ensures it is financially viable at all times and has sufficient financial

resources to fulfil its obligations. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 9

p.33

The financial processes/systems of the agency are properly operated and maintained

in accordance with sound and appropriate accounting standards and practice. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 9 Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 32

p.33

cost of caring for each child or young person placed with him or her. Payments are

made promptly and at the agreed time. Allowances and fees are reviewed annually. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 A centralised payment scheme is in place and feedback from carers was that in general, this is satisfactory although respite payments appear inevitably to be delayed to an unacceptable level There are 3 levels at which carers can be paid – however, details of payments or payment reviews could not be evidenced on carers files. Staff spoken to stated that an overall review of foster care payments is imminent. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 33

p.34

The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:

• Fostering panels are organised efficiently and effectively so as to ensure that

p.35

Fostering panels have clear written policies and procedures, which are implemented

in practice, about the handling of their functions. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 The membership of the panel was appropriate and accurate on the day of inspection. A retired social services staff member chaired it. On the day of the inspection, the panel were observed to approve carers that they had identified as having gaps in their assessment and these were not addressed face-to-face at panel either. Approval was granted for a particular kinship carer, without any information whatsoever on the children’s progress/development whilst in the care of this relative. Again the panel recognised this deficit yet approved rather than deferred. Kinship approvals were taking place 1-2 years after the children were placed. One carer was challenged on some racist views they had allegedly made and the response demonstrated a complete lack of insight, sensitivity and awareness into valuing people from

p.35

Fostering panels have clear written policies and procedures, which are implemented

differing backgrounds, culture. This carer was approved (minutes taken of the panel meetings are very limited) without a recommendation. Carers attending panel were each given a ‘feedback sheet’ to complete – none of those completed were seen at the inspection. Carers with an outstanding reference and medical reference were approved, prior to receipt of the reference, rather than being deferred. A structured and robust checking process could not be evidenced in terms of the evidence available to support panel decisions. Overall, assessments brought to panel on the day of the inspection were missing vital information and contained limited detail of historical issues for carers and changes they have made since. Whilst the panel asked carers some questions, these were limited and left unpursued if a limited response was offered. The panel appeared to approve carers with a note to chase references, for example, rather

p.35

Fostering panels have clear written policies and procedures, which are implemented

than ensure all information was in place and all queries answered before granting approval, the practice of the panel needs to be reviewed with some urgency and action for training. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 34

p.35

The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:

• When foster care is provided as a short-term break for a child, the arrangement recognises that the parents remain the main carers for the child.

p.36

have policies and procedures, implemented in practice, to meet the particular needs

of children receiving short-term breaks. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 9 Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 35

p.36

The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:

• Local authority fostering services' policies and procedures for assessing,

p.37

there is recognition of the particular relationship and position of family and friend

carers. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 9 Kinship care arrangements were not inspected on this occasion although some assessments and approvals were observed at the panel. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 36

p.37

Date

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 37

p.39

comments/confirmation relating to the content and accuracy of the report for

We would welcome comments on the content of this report relating to the Inspection conducted on 16 th March 2004 and any factual inaccuracies:

p.39

comments/confirmation relating to the content and accuracy of the report for

Please limit your comments to one side of A4 if possible

p.39

comments/confirmation relating to the content and accuracy of the report for

We are working on the best way to include provider responses in the published report. In the meantime responses received are available on request. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 38

p.39

Action taken by the NCSC in response to the provider’s comments:

Amendments to the report were necessary NO

p.40

Action taken by the NCSC in response to the provider’s comments:

Comments were received from the provider NO

p.40

Action taken by the NCSC in response to the provider’s comments:

Provider comments/factual amendments were incorporated into the final inspection report NO

p.40

Action taken by the NCSC in response to the provider’s comments:

NO Provider comments are available on file at the Area Office but have not been incorporated into the final inspection report. The inspector believes the report to be factually accurate

p.40

Note:

In instances where there is a major difference of view between the Inspector and the Registered Provider responsible Local Authority fostering service Manager both views will be made available on request to the Area Office.

p.40

report:

Action plan was received at the point of publication NO

p.40

report:

Action plan covers all the statutory requirements in a timely fashion

p.40

report:

Action plan did not cover all the statutory requirements and required further discussion

p.40

report:

Provider has declined to provide an action plan YES

p.40

Public reports

It should be noted that all NCSC inspection reports are public documents. Reports on children’s homes are only obtainable on personal application to NCSC offices. Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency Page 39

p.40

Registered Person’s or responsible Local Authority Manager’s statement of

agreement/comments: Please complete the relevant section that applies.

p.41

Date

Note: In instance where there is a profound difference of view between the Inspector and the Registered Provider both views will be reported. Please attach any extra pages, as applicable.

p.41

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency / 16th March 2004

Commission for Social Care Inspection 33 Greycoat Street London SW1P 2QF

p.42

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency / 16th March 2004

Telephone: 020 7979 2000 Fax: 020 7979 2111

p.42

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency / 16th March 2004

National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 www.csci.org.uk

p.42

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency / 16th March 2004

S0000055714.V141765.R01 © This report may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection

p.42

Plymouth City Council Local Authority Fostering Agency / 16th March 2004

The paper used in this document is supplied from a sustainable source

p.42

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion