Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    PO1 2BG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+7Mostly positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiverobusttimelystrengthssupportiveclear
Criticismpoorlacksnot alwaysinsufficientdelaysbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings606w+75
  • What needs to improve206w−79

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
812
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 25%

Full report text

Mr Julian Wooster Strategic Director, Children, Families and Learning Portsmouth City Council 3 rd Floor, Civic Offices Guildhall Square Portsmouth Hampshire, PO1 2BG

p.1

services

This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Portsmouth Council which was conducted on 10 and 11 November 2009. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year.

p.1

services

The inspection identified one area for priority action and some areas for development which are detailed below.

p.1

services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for the help and time given by you and your colleagues during this inspection.

p.1

services

From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment services were satisfactorily carrying out their responsibilities in accordance with national guidance, in particular:

p.1

services

ƒ Processes for receiving and prioritising information and referrals of children and young people are robust and timely. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ Clear thresholds for access to referral and assessment services, which have been agreed with partner agencies and have recently been updated, are in place

p.1

services

ƒ Child protection enquiries are timely and appropriately investigated and assessed by suitably qualified workers.

p.2

services

ƒ The views of children and young people, who are involved in the assessment of their needs, are recorded and the outcomes of initial assessments are routinely sent to them. Equality and diversity issues are satisfactorily considered within assessments.

p.2

services

ƒ Senior managers have appropriate audit and performance management systems in place which enable them to monitor workloads and throughput of cases and review and develop services. For example, the Initial Assessment and Protection Service has recently been restructured to maximise its efficiency. It is, however, too early to assess the impact.

p.2

services

ƒ Senior managers provide effective oversight and challenge of casework decisions where children may be received into care.

p.2

services

The following strengths and areas for development were also identified:

p.2

Strengths

ƒ There is an efficient out of hours service, which is well integrated with the assessment teams. The Emergency Duty Team provides a well resourced, robust and effective service for children and their families.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Effective partnership working across agencies is well established and results in most cases in prompt and appropriate referrals to identify children and families in need.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Case records are up to date and information contained on files is of good quality.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ A graduate trainee programme, together with a good induction and support package, is highly valued by social work staff and facilitates staff retention. Staff report that morale is high within the Initial Assessment and the Child Protection and Court teams, with good access to supportive managers.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The Initial Assessment and Duty Team is fully staffed with permanent staff who have manageable workloads. ƒ Staff are provided with regular formal supervision, which is recorded and up to date, and frequent opportunities for personal development and training.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ There are vacancies not covered in social work posts within the Child Protection and Court teams which results in high numbers of cases remaining unallocated. These are overseen by a senior practitioner and issues arising responded to by different duty workers. While these numbers have gradually reduced, the support received by those children and their families lacks continuity.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The timeliness of initial assessments for children in need is poor, leading to delays in services being provided to some children and their families.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Decisions and managerial oversight that take place outside of formal supervision are not regularly recorded in case files. It is, therefore, not always evident when case plans are changed.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ While service user feedback is sought and collated, it has insufficient influence on service development.

p.3

Areas for development

This visit has identified the following area for priority action.

p.3

Area for priority action

ƒ Some cases referred to the Initial Assessment Team, have been inappropriately closed without the children being seen and therefore their needs are not fully investigated.

p.3

Area for priority action

Heather Brown Divisional Manager, Social Care Safeguarding

p.3

Area for priority action

Copy: David Williams, Chief Executive, Portsmouth Council Julian Wooster, Acting Chair of Portsmouth Safeguarding Children Board Cllr John Ireland, Cabinet Member for Education, Portsmouth Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion