Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ralph Trevelyan-Butler

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ralph Trevelyan-Butler

  • Postcode verified

    TS10 1SP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+2Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedpositivestrongstrengtheffectivelyrobusttimelywell supported
Criticismconcernsat risklackinconsistentnot sufficientlyyet toharmvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings674w+35
  • What needs to improve219w−73

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
893
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 29, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 25%

Full report text

Ms Barbara Shaw Acting Director of Adult and Children’s Services Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council Seafield House Kirkleatham Street Redcar TS10 1SP

p.1

services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council which was conducted on 9 and 10 November 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

services

The areas for development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in January 2010 have been considered during this inspection. The local authority developed an action plan and significant progress has been made in most of these areas. Two areas for development continue to be addressed in the plan but the measures taken are yet to have sufficient impact. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

services

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ There is strong multi-agency working to protect children identified to be at risk of harm. Strategy discussions are given high priority by statutory agencies and they are used very effectively to enhance the quality of investigations.

p.2

following areas

ƒ There is a positive commitment at all levels of management to improve further the quality of work with children and families. The auditing of cases is now more sharply focused, and both social workers and managers report the new arrangements to be robust and constructive.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Most case records seen were up-to-date and included evidence of management decision making. Staff report that recording has been significantly improved through the council’s investment in a new electronic system.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The majority of assessments are undertaken in a timely manner. The council’s own figures evidence a significant improvement in the timeliness of core assessments from July 2010 following the management decision to undertake all initial assessments in the access team enabling the locality teams to focus on core assessments.

p.2

following areas

ƒ A new initiative with the police has improved multi-agency investigations of concerns about children in families experiencing domestic violence. The daily meetings between the police and children’s services have improved the ability to prioritise and respond promptly to referrals, and have also enhanced information sharing with other agencies.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff are very positive about the accessibility and support of managers. Workers spoken to consider their suggestions for improvements are listened to and influence the development of the service.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff, including those who are newly qualified, are well supported through regular supervision and good quality training. Newly qualified workers speak highly of the mentoring provided to support reflective practice.

p.2

following areas

ƒ In the cases seen by inspectors children were safeguarded through an appropriate and prompt response to concerns. All child protection enquiries are undertaken by suitably experienced and qualified social workers.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The children with disabilities team undertakes holistic assessments of the needs of children and families. This ensures that accessibility to services is not overly reliant on the medical diagnosis. ƒ Most social workers have manageable caseloads, which enables work to be allocated in a timely manner.

p.2

following areas

ƒ There is effective liaison with the emergency duty team, which acts appropriately to safeguard children outside of normal working hours.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ There is a lack of clarity within the access team as to when a contact becomes a referral, and sometimes contacts are closed inappropriately.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The current arrangements for transferring telephone calls from the main switchboard to the access team do not facilitate a prompt response to the public or other professionals.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The quality of initial and core assessments is inconsistent; this was an area for development at the last inspection. The council has recognised the need to improve this through staff training and the recently revised system of auditing.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ While there is an action plan arising from the previous unannounced inspection to improve the recording of children’s views, overall practice in this area remains variable.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The rate of referrals is rising and early preventative work is not sufficiently embedded. As a result, agencies are still making referrals which could otherwise be dealt with through the common assessment framework, thus increasing pressure on the access team.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Amanda Skelton, Chief Executive, Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council Patti Summerfield, Chair of Redcar and Cleveland Safeguarding Children Board Ian Jeffrey, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion