Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
OL16 1LQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There have been two serious case reviews which were inadequate. p.2
- However, a lower proportion of secondary schools are good or better and there is some inadequate provision. p.2
- There are key weaknesses at Key Stage 4 for some young people from minority ethnic groups where their performance is below the national average and below that of similar areas. p.2
- Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 602
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 28, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Terry Piggott Executive Director of Children, Schools and Families Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Floor 7, Municipal Offices Smith Street Rochdale OL16 1LQ
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Children’s services in Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council perform well.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
The overall effectiveness of inspected services is good. The proportion of primary schools judged to be good or outstanding is higher than the national average while a lower proportion has been judged to be inadequate. However, a lower proportion of secondary schools are good or better and there is some inadequate provision. The provision for very young children is more mixed. A higher proportion of nurseries and some childcare is good or outstanding than nationally but there are relative weaknesses in childminding. Judgements under the Every Child Matters outcomes are good or better in the large majority of cases and at least in line with performance in similar authorities. This includes those for staying safe and enjoying and achieving. The performance of the local authority’s fostering and adoption agencies is good and private fostering arrangements are satisfactory. However, one children’s home is
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
currently inadequate. There have been two serious case reviews which were inadequate.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Performance against the national indicators, including staying safe and enjoying and achieving, demonstrate performance that is in line or better than performance in similar areas and nationally. There are key weaknesses at Key Stage 4 for some young people from minority ethnic groups where their performance is below the national average and below that of similar areas. A larger proportion of young people are not engaged in education, employment or training than nationally.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion