Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    S65 1AS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivestrengthseffectivelyeffectiveconsistentaccuratetimely
Criticisminconsistentbelowdelayedvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings383w+50
  • What needs to improve265w−25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
648
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 15, typical 45
Average sentence
28 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%What needs to improve 41%

Full report text

25 August 2009 Mrs Joyce Thacker Strategic Director for Children and Young People’s Services Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council 1 st Floor Norfolk House Walker Place Rotherham S65 1AS

p.1

assessment arrangements within Rotherham children’s services

This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Rotherham council which was conducted on 4 and 5 August 2009. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Rotherham children’s services

The inspection identified three areas for priority action and a number of areas for development, which are detailed below. The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Rotherham children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:

p.1

assessment arrangements within Rotherham children’s services

ƒ The access team provides a consistent response to initial contacts and gathers relevant information before passing the information to the locality teams. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456293 Direct F 0117 9456554 Susan.wootton@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ The out of hours service is staffed by suitably qualified and experienced staff and, in addition to responding to emergency referrals, undertakes ‘welfare visits’ in appropriate cases.

p.1

assessment arrangements within Rotherham children’s services

ƒ The council is taking positive steps to respond to the needs of the Slovak Roma community.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Rotherham children’s services

ƒ The co-location of health and social care professionals is starting to provide opportunities for direct staff communication on individual cases.

p.2

assessment arrangements within Rotherham children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The children with disabilities specialist team undertake contact, referral and assessment responsibilities effectively.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ The performance in respect of the completion of initial assessments and core assessments is inconsistent and often significantly delayed. ƒ The level and quality of formal supervision is considerably below that stated in the council’s supervision policy. ƒ The initial response to contacts across the localities is variable with a high level of ‘no further action’ decisions being taken. ƒ There is no evidence, from the cases seen, that the use of the Common Assessment Framework (CAF) is having significant impact.

p.2

Areas for development

This visit has identified the following areas for priority action:

p.2

Area(s) for priority action

ƒ The wide range of work undertaken by social workers in localities undermines their capacity to deliver effective services to safeguard vulnerable children. ƒ Performance management systems and auditing policies do not ensure that local and senior managers are able to fully exercise their decision- making and supervisory responsibilities in respect of contact, referral and assessment processes. ƒ Information systems do not appear to provide up to date and accurate information on all contacts and referrals and the status of investigations, assessments and plans. Reduced email ‘in box’ capacity for managers adversely affects the timely and appropriate transfer of case information on vulnerable children. The areas for priority action identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.2

Area(s) for priority action

Heather Brown Divisional Manager, Social Care Safeguarding

p.3

Area(s) for priority action

Copy: Mr Mike Cuff, Chief Executive, Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Mrs Judith Dodd, Chair of Rotherham Safeguarding Children Board Mr Shaun Wright, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion