Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
RM17 6SL
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- A combination of good team management and staff support, accessible and focused supervision, and relevant training and development opportunities, has helped to establish strong teams with good staff morale, ensuring that the high levels of demand for service are consistently met by well considered practice. p.3
- Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk Managerial decisions about contacts and referrals are made in a consistently timely way and recorded clearly on case files. p.1
- Sound processes and rigorous management ensure smooth and timely transfer of cases to longer term teams. Performance monitoring is used regularly by relevant managers, with periodic quality audits that are independent of line management. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Consequently, resources in the contact, referral and assessment team are not used in the most efficient way. p.3
- Analysis of data on referrals and management is insufficient to establish the underlying reasons. p.3
- Heather Brown Divisional Manager, Social Care Safeguarding p.4
- Copy: Bob Coomber, Chief Executive, Thurrock Council Amy Weir, Chair of Thurrock Safeguarding Children Board Sue MacPherson, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Thurrock Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 954
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 26, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 24 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Jo Olsson Director of Children Education and Families Thurrock Council Civic Offices New Road, Grays Essex RM17 6SL
p.1
services
This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Thurrock Council which was conducted on 3 and 4 November 2009. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year.
p.1
services
The inspection identified no areas for priority action but some areas for development, which are detailed below.
p.1
services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.
p.1
services
From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:
p.1
services
Contacts made by professionals and the public about the welfare of children, young people and their families are recorded clearly and presented to managers in a timely way. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk Managerial decisions about contacts and referrals are made in a consistently timely way and recorded clearly on case files.
p.1
services
Referrals, assessments and other case records contain appropriate information about the ethnic origin, religion, and cultural issues regarding children and families which is used effectively to inform decision-making in casework.
p.2
services
Allocation of referrals for assessment is prompt. Inspectors found that Initial Response teams had no unallocated cases or cases awaiting assessment at the time of inspection.
p.2
services
Timeliness of completion of initial and core assessments is in line with comparable authorities and national averages.
p.2
services
The quality of most initial and core assessments is at least satisfactory, with some examples of very good practice seen by inspectors. Assessments are child and family focused with the individual needs of siblings given due consideration.
p.2
services
Caseloads are of manageable proportions, despite the demand for assessments having increased.
p.2
services
Priority is given to ensuring that children are always seen, and seen alone when necessary, by social workers during visits; the views of children and families are taken into account appropriately in assessments and care planning.
p.2
services
In all child protection cases seen by inspectors, the response was prompt with risks identified at an early stage and most initial intervention plans are timely and effective.
p.2
services
Consistency in application of a clear method of co-working between the Initial Response and Children with Disabilities teams on complex cases helps to ensure that the needs of children and young people are fully understood and responded to appropriately.
p.2
services
Inter-agency work is effective with evidence of frequent and necessary communication between partner agencies to ensure proper assessment and initial case planning.
p.2
services
The Emergency Duty Team is accessible and responsive and works well in collaboration with mainstream services.
p.2
services
Sound processes and rigorous management ensure smooth and timely transfer of cases to longer term teams. Performance monitoring is used regularly by relevant managers, with periodic quality audits that are independent of line management. In combination, these provide a sound basis to improve practice further.
p.2
services
From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:
p.3
Strengths
Good use is made by practitioners and managers of the council’s electronic record system and the integrated children’s system. These support front line practice and provide good evidence of outcomes in individual cases.
p.3
Strengths
Consultant social workers are deployed within the Initial Response teams and are making a positive impact on the quality of the service. There is good evidence of expert advice and clear intervention in the many cases in which domestic abuse and alcohol and substance misuse are features.
p.3
Strengths
A combination of good team management and staff support, accessible and focused supervision, and relevant training and development opportunities, has helped to establish strong teams with good staff morale, ensuring that the high levels of demand for service are consistently met by well considered practice.
p.3
Strengths
Senior managers contribute frequently and positively to decision-making in complex cases, and are closely involved in improving the quality of the contact, referral and assessment service.
p.3
Areas for development
There is no effective protocol between partner agencies to screen and consider the most effective response to large numbers of incidents of domestic abuse that are referred to the council. Consequently, resources in the contact, referral and assessment team are not used in the most efficient way.
p.3
Areas for development
The proportion of referrals that are repeat referrals within 12 months of a previous referral remains higher than in comparable councils and well above the national average. Analysis of data on referrals and management is insufficient to establish the underlying reasons.
p.3
Areas for development
Although the council collates some service user views to help improve children’s services, insufficient use is made of their views to improve the effectiveness of the contact, referral and assessment system. Yours sincerely
p.3
Areas for development
Heather Brown Divisional Manager, Social Care Safeguarding
p.4
Areas for development
Copy: Bob Coomber, Chief Executive, Thurrock Council Amy Weir, Chair of Thurrock Safeguarding Children Board Sue MacPherson, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Thurrock Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion