Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Lolly Rascagneres
- Postcode verified
WS1 1TW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of analysis was identified as an area for development at the last inspection. p.3
- Senior managers recognise and acknowledge this is an area for development. There are clear management decisions recorded on most files. p.3
- However, the rationale underpinning the decisions and actions taken is not always explicit. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.4
- Copy: Paul Sheehan, Chief Executive, Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council Jane Evans, Chair of Walsall Safeguarding Children Board Councillor Rachel Andrew, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,113
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 25, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 25 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Pauline Pilkington Executive Director for Children’s Services Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council Room 39, The Council House Lichfield Street Walsall WS1 1TW
p.1
services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council which was conducted on 30 November and 1 December 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
services
The inspection identified an area of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
services
The majority of areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in February 2010 have been addressed although, further work is on-going to improve the quality of analysis in initial and core assessments and this remains an area for development. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
services
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
There are strong multi-agency partnership arrangements in place, particularly with the police to ensure a prompt and effective response to children, young people and their families affected by, or at potential risk of, domestic abuse. There is a high level of multi-agency commitment to resourcing the daily consideration of domestic abuse incidents strengthening the safeguarding arrangements for the affected children and young people.
p.2
following areas
Prompt and effective action is taken to ensure that children and young people at risk, including those with disabilities, are safeguarded through timely child protection investigations which lead to clear outcomes. Investigations are always carried out by qualified social workers.
p.2
following areas
Clear inter-agency thresholds to access social care services are in place and are applied consistently by the initial response team (IRT), although the recently agreed threshold for referral to the children and young people with disabilities team is not yet fully embedded with partners and its impact is yet to be evaluated. Appropriate decisions about incoming contacts and referrals are made in line with statutory timescales.
p.2
following areas
Children and young people are involved in their assessments and are routinely seen alone with good evidence that their feelings and wishes are taken into account to inform case planning.
p.2
following areas
The council has taken appropriate action to gain feedback from children, young people and their families to learn from their experience of the service, although the impact on service delivery is yet to be evaluated.
p.2
following areas
There is evidence of appropriate attention to the diverse needs of children and young people and their families in assessments with good examples of the use of interpreters to support their involvement. Assessments demonstrate suitable awareness of and sensitivity to cultural diversity and disabilities.
p.2
following areas
Appropriate management systems are in place to monitor the work and performance of the IRT although the council recognises the need to review the format in which management information is produced so that it is easily accessible. The Walsall Local Safeguarding Board receives regular performance monitoring information which is used to challenge practice and management decision making in order to deliver a more effective service to children, young people and their families.
p.2
following areas
Completed cases to be transferred to other teams are audited and the decision is signed off by managers enabling a prompt transfer of cases between teams.
p.2
following areas
Staff morale is good and is supported by high quality supervision and manageable caseloads. Social workers and their managers demonstrate a strong commitment to continual improvement of the service offered to children, young people and their families.
p.3
following areas
Newly qualified social workers speak highly of the support provided by managers. This includes good induction, protected caseloads, and regular supervision to promote their professional development. They benefit from co- working alongside more experienced social workers on child protection cases.
p.3
following areas
The council’s commitment to their staff is demonstrated through the recently developed staff recruitment and retention strategy which includes clear career pathways, a reduction in the use of agency staff, and a good range of training and development opportunities.
p.3
following areas
Lessons from serious case reviews have been disseminated to front line staff and social workers say they value the emphasis placed on the lessons to be learned to support their professional development and inspectors saw evidence that this has resulted in improved practice.
p.3
following areas
Social workers are supported by readily accessible inter-agency policies and procedures which are known and used well.
p.3
following areas
Case records are written up in a timely manner and are used to inform case planning and intervention and include chronologies.
p.3
following areas
The common assessment framework (CAF) activities are well established across most agencies and professionals. The council has responded well to an identified need to co-locate CAF co-ordinators in the IRT to ensure vulnerable children and young people and their families are offered timely and appropriate support from a good range of preventative services.
p.3
following areas
The emergency response team arrangements are well co-ordinated with those of the IRT and provide an effective out-of-hours service to children and their families.
p.3
Areas for development
The quality of initial and core assessments seen by inspectors is variable with some lacking sufficient analysis of risk and protective factors. The quality of analysis was identified as an area for development at the last inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
While effective action is taken to ensure that children and young people are safe, the record of strategy discussion is not always sufficiently detailed in making clear which agency will undertake the work. Senior managers recognise and acknowledge this is an area for development. There are clear management decisions recorded on most files. However, the rationale underpinning the decisions and actions taken is not always explicit.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.4
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Paul Sheehan, Chief Executive, Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council Jane Evans, Chair of Walsall Safeguarding Children Board Councillor Rachel Andrew, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion