Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Hunt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Steve Hunt

  • Postcode verified

    NG1 6HJ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingeffectiveexcellenteffectivelystronghigh qualityimprovedsuccessfully
Criticismconcernsinadequateweakpoorinconsistentdelays

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings621w+58
  • Safeguarding244w+1

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
861
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 27, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
19%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%Safeguarding 28%

Full report text

Building C Cumberland Place Nottingham NG1 6HJ Telephone: 0300 123 1231 Fax: 0300 123 3159 Minicom : 0161 618 8524 Email: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk Web: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs Christine Banim Operational Director Cafcass Central 6th Floor Sanctuary Buildings Great Smith Street London, SW1P 3BT

p.1

service area

This letter summarises the findings of the recent inspection of Cafcass in Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire service area which was conducted on 12 and 13 January 2011. The inspection was carried out under sections 143–145 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

service area

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of progress that is being made against the Cafcass Transformation Plan through aspects of the existing published framework for the inspection of Cafcass, focusing on aspects of:

p.1

service area

„ ambition and prioritisation „ performance management „ safeguarding „ service responsiveness.

p.1

service area

Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: information about Cafcass provided by the local judiciary and Local Authority Children’s Services Departments ; case records; a range of data and policy documents; observation of the work of family court advisers and a family support worker. Inspectors met with senior and first line managers, family court advisers and family support workers.

p.1

planning

ƒ The leadership provided by the Operational Director for Cafcass Central and the management team in Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire service area is clear and effective. Strategies, policies and procedures support front line practice and comply with statutory requirements to safeguard children and young people. Effective systems are in place to monitor compliance with policy requirements and ensure that staff are accountable for their work. ƒ The area business plan identifies and prioritises accurately the actions needed to sustain and improve service delivery. The plan is supported by an implementation programme that has strong impact in the effective management of change. For example, service delivery is improved through the implementation of Early Intervention Teams and the introduction of proportionate working across the service area. Early Intervention Teams provide timely risk assessed safeguarding information about children and families to

p.2

planning

courts when cases are at an early stage in family proceedings. Proportionate working ensures that cases are allocated resources efficiently in relation to the assessed safeguarding needs of each case. These important changes to service delivery and a new culture in front line practice have been managed well and are now successfully implemented. ƒ Local judiciary and Children’s Services departments confirm that relationships are good and liaison is effective resulting in good communication between organisations. ƒ The performance by Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire service area measured by compliance with key indicators is outstanding. Almost all performance indicators are better than national averages. Financial management is sound with unit costs remaining constant as more performance indicators are met. ƒ Quality assurance of front line practice is inconsistent between teams and weak in some aspects. Although the quality assurance system

p.2

planning

Q4C is applied consistently, the judgements made by managers about the standard of work are often inaccurate and need further moderation. This includes some poor practice and excellent work that is currently judged satisfactory by Cafcass. PROTECT-PRIVATE

p.2

Reducing delays and unallocated cases

„ Key Performance data demonstrates that there is no delay in allocation, intervention and reporting on any case in Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire service area. This improvement in performance is outstanding in the context of previous long delays and an 80% increase in demand for public law work over the last two years. The service area has implemented a range of measures to achieve this level of improvement including increased workloads, proportionate working, changes to working practices, new team structures and effective protocols with courts. Significantly, this level of performance is achieved with the cooperation of a staff group who have a high level of morale.

p.3

safeguarding practice and the assessment of risk

„ Inspectors assess safeguarding practice as satisfactory overall, although the work in some teams is stronger than others. Internal audits of cases across Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire service area conducted in July 2010 reached the same conclusion. „ Most cases seen by Inspectors are child focused and all concerned the welfare of children. The practice in one case inspected was outstanding in the attention given to the emotional well being of a child involved in the extreme animosity between the parents in private law proceedings „ Cases are screened effectively for domestic violence and the needs of children are understood and assessed well in most cases. High quality Cafcass assessment tools are used effectively by practitioners to enable children and young people to voice their safeguarding concerns. „ In the sample of cases examined by Inspectors with regards to safeguarding practice most are at least satisfactory. However, one case

p.3

safeguarding practice and the assessment of risk

sampled had to be referred to the Local Authority by Cafcass because safeguarding concerns had not been identified. „ Schedule 2 reports provide safeguarding information to courts at first PROTECT-PRIVATE

p.3

safeguarding practice and the assessment of risk

PROTECT-PRIVATE directions. Inspectors identified some Schedule 2 reports that made recommendations to court without sufficient information or included unsubstantiated allegations by parties about each other. Through internal audit the service area is already aware of this and steps have been taken to ensure that improvement is achieved.

p.4

safeguarding practice and the assessment of risk

Any areas of inadequate performance will be specifically considered in any future inspection of Cafcass services in your area.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion