Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Margaret Farrow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Margaret Farrow

  • Postcode verified

    WF1 4SF

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−30Criticalmore positive than 10% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivepositiveimprovedoutstandingsuccessfullyclearstrongproud
Criticisminadequategapsconcernsrequires improvementweaknessesat riskconcernnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2148w−13
  • What needs to improve454w−81

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
2,502
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 17%

Full report text

Ofsted is proud to use recycled paper 21 May 2015

p.1

Mr Alan Yellup OBE Chief Executive Officer Wakefield City Academies Trust Warmfield View Wakefield WF1 4SF

p.1

Focused inspection of Wakefield City Academies Trust

Following the focused inspection of a number of Wakefield City Academies Trust (WCAT) academies and the subsequent follow-up visit to the trust by Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) Margaret Farrow and Brian Blake, I am writing on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Focused inspection of Wakefield City Academies Trust

Thank you for your cooperation and that of all the staff whom we met during our visit on 19 and 20 May 2015. We particularly appreciated the time and care taken to prepare the programme for us. Please pass on our thanks to your staff and other stakeholders who kindly gave up their time to meet us.

p.1

Evidence

Five of the trust’s academies were inspected in the week prior to this on-site visit. Of these, four were under section 5 of the Education Act 2005, and one, a monitoring inspection, was under section 8 of the same Act. Discussions were held with academy leaders and governors during these inspections. Telephone discussions were also held at the same time with leaders of five other academies within the trust. During this follow-up visit to WCAT, discussions were held with the chief executive officer, senior and operational staff from the trust, headteachers, the chair of the board and partners. Inspectors also scrutinised a range of relevant documentation.

p.1

Context

WCAT evolved from Wakefield City High School, which was judged outstanding at each of its last three Ofsted inspections. The high school became an academy in January 2011 and, following this, the Department for Education (DfE) invited it to become an approved academy sponsor. At this time, it also became a teaching school. The academy began supporting weak secondary schools. Wakefield local Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.gov.uk/Ofsted authority then asked the academy to sponsor two of its primary schools judged to require special measures following their 2012 Ofsted inspections.

p.1

Context

WCAT became a multi-academy trust in August 2013. The trust has grown significantly in the past two years, bringing failing schools into the trust at the request of the DfE or local authorities. It now has academies in four local authorities: Wakefield, Doncaster, Sheffield and the East Riding of Yorkshire. The inclusion of an academy in Rotherham is imminent. Plans are well-advanced for two secondary and four primary academies to become part of WCAT by September 2015. This includes Carr Lane, a new purpose-built primary academy in Doncaster. Two schools judged good at the time of their inspection have asked to join WCAT. The trust’s education, business administrative and finance teams have expanded accordingly, all within an agreed DfE growth plan.

p.2

Summary findings

WCAT has articulated its vision across its family of academies very successfully. Trust and academy leaders speak enthusiastically about a shared sense of purpose and culture of improvement. ‘Setting children on the right way’, ‘raising staff morale’ and ‘challenge and change with dignity’ are common explanations of the trust’s approach to raising aspirations, achievement and driving improvement. Two years into its development, WCAT is making a positive difference to the quality of provision and outcomes for pupils within its academies.

p.2

Summary findings

All four academies that were subject to recent section 5 inspections have improved their overall effectiveness by at least a grade. Three now require improvement to be good; their predecessor schools were all judged inadequate. The sixth form in one academy is now good. A primary academy, previously judged inadequate, has improved by two grades and is now good. The HMI monitoring report for one academy indicates that that academy is continuing to make reasonable progress towards the removal of special measures. Monitoring reports for the remaining secondary academy, which is also in special measures, identify the positive difference trust staff are making to pupils’ achievement and the quality of teaching and leadership and management.

p.2

Summary findings

The trust has a good knowledge and understanding of individual academies’ strengths and weaknesses. Trust leaders and directors are tenacious in gathering a range of information and data about pupils’ achievements, progress and attendance. Their knowledge is strengthened by the quality of information collected from staff who provide targeted support to academies and by the requirement of all academies to report pupil achievement, attendance and exclusion information to the trust board at six-weekly intervals. Academy leaders speak convincingly about how they are increasingly held to account for the achievements of their pupils through formal discussions and reporting of the outcomes of such data.

p.2

Summary findings

Leaders use this information appropriately to allocate, target or redirect support to academies in need and to tackle any cross-academy issues. Evidence of the impact of such work can be seen in the regular, detailed performance reports for each academy. Current assessment information indicates that academies, including those with the lowest baseline of achievement, are improving on previous years’ achievements. In the majority of academies, there is a reduction in the gap between disadvantaged pupils and non-disadvantaged pupils. Trust and academy leaders are aware that there is still much more to do to ensure that gaps are narrowing at an appropriate rate, in particular for boys and pupils with identified special educational needs. Actions are in place to tackle academies that are continuing to cause concern because performance gaps between different groups remain too wide.

p.2

Summary findings

The board has a very clear understanding about the quality of teaching because trust directors, along with national and local leaders of education, work closely with academy leaders observing lessons and scrutinising pupils’ work and the quality of feedback and marking, alongside checking progress towards key areas identified for improvement in each academy. Recent monitoring and inspection reports identify the improvements being made to the quality of teaching and its impact on pupils’ learning and progress. The recent implementation of a common teacher appraisal process across the trust has ensured that every teacher is now responsible for the progress all of their pupils make in every class they teach, rather than, as previously, for end of key stage outcomes. It is too early to see the full impact of this strategy but headteachers who spoke to inspectors during this visit consider this is has been

p.3

Summary findings

pivotal in improving the effectiveness of performance management arrangements.

p.3

Summary findings

The trust has set out its vision in a strategic plan with a small number of key priorities. The plan identifies the vision and ethos of WCAT successfully. As yet, it does not accurately reflect the emerging key school improvement priorities that follow the continual monitoring of academy’s work, nor the changes that will need to take place as the trust expands. Trust and academy leaders are committed to working in partnership with parents and carers. The chief executive officer eloquently describes the range of interactions and discussions that take place. However, this commitment is not reflected clearly enough within the strategic plan’s priorities. Underpinning action plans do not always have measurable targets, timescales or baseline information against which success of actions can be measured easily on an ongoing basis over the life of the plan.

p.3

Summary findings

Reviews and monitoring reports from trust staff regarding their work with individual academies are very detailed. They provide significant evidence of the regular monitoring taking place, the checking of the work of academy leaders and of the staff supporting the academy. However, the impact of this work is not recorded clearly enough in such reports.

p.3

Summary findings

The cultivation of the skills, competencies and confidence of staff lies at the heart of the trust’s improvement strategy. The trust utilises the skills of its own national leaders of education, directors (senior staff from the trust who work in across academies) and subject specialists to provide a range of training and development opportunities to teachers, leaders and staff across the trust. Trust leaders have developed strong links with a range of partners including regional and national universities to raise aspirations of pupils, expectations of teachers, enhance professional development opportunities and to learn from good practice. Academy leaders confirm universally the high regard they hold for the continuing professional development opportunities they and their staff receive. Such work is a strength of the trust and a major factor in the improvements in pupils’ achievements and the quality of teaching and leadership and management across the trust. Academy

p.3

Summary findings

leaders report how cross-trust training is also helping to develop sustainability of leadership in academies, nurture the common vision and values of the trust and share the current good practice that exists in academies across the trust.

p.4

Summary findings

The trust also looks beyond its own boundaries to secure additional expertise and experience at both whole-trust level and academy leader or individual teacher level when needed. The trust has developed effective partnerships with local authorities, as exemplified by the reciprocal commissioning of support from the senior officers from Wakefield council when needed and the targeted school improvement work WCAT provides for maintained schools within Wakefield.

p.4

Summary findings

Academy governors appreciate the range of training they can access and the regular keeping-in-touch meetings between chairs of local governing bodies and the chair of the board. While this goes some way in helping local governing bodies to understand their roles, not all academy leaders and governors are clear about the responsibilities linked to these roles. This is partly because the trust’s scheme of delegation is insufficiently clear about the demarcation of responsibilities between the trust board and local governing bodies. Trust leaders are aware of this and, as the trust has grown in size, have become aware that the scheme needs revising to take account of the broader community of academies and ensure that leaders, local governing bodies and other stakeholders are clear about the delegation of responsibilities.

p.4

Summary findings

Effective links have been developed with children’s services in the local authorities where WCAT operates to support pupils at risk and ensure effective safeguarding arrangements. Leaders keep abreast of issues of concern in the community and staff are suitably trained in identifying risks and how to respond to concerns or allegations. This includes training staff on how to be alert, and respond, to potential signs of extremism or radicalisation, child sexual exploitation or children missing from education. Some very robust work has been undertaken by one director on pupils out of school or in alternative provision. As a result, many pupils previously in alternative education are now back in the academy and practices and procedures have been improved across the trust.

p.4

Summary findings

The chief operating officer of the trust makes sure safeguarding training for staff and designated leaders for child protection is up to date and delivered at an appropriate level. However, leaders of the trust are aware that, as academies transfer into the trust, not all child protection policies meet statutory requirements. Action is being taken to check and guide individual academy leaders to ensure that policies are compliant on entry to minimise risks. This work is developing but not enough has been done yet to ensure that local governing bodies report and review the impact of their policies consistently well. Nevertheless, senior leaders in the trust ensure that information regarding any safeguarding allegations or concerns from academies or local communities are considered and inform future practice. For example, the senior director for education has developed trust-wide guidance for crisis incident

p.4

Summary findings

management procedures to guide and support individual academies following his identification of concerns in one local community.

p.5

Summary findings

Rigorous tracking of pupils’ attendance and the subsequent challenge brought to bear on leaders, pupils and parents are making a positive difference to the attendance rates in most academies. The regular tracking shows that absence rates are generally falling, but leaders accept there are still a number of academies where persistent absence rates are too high. Partnership working with local authority education welfare officers, support to families and pupils and movement to prosecution when needed is starting to show improvement, but there is still much to do to reduce the stubbornly high absence rates in two academies. Work to improve the involvement of pupils at risk of exclusion has helped to reduce the proportion of fixed period exclusion in virtually all academies. Again, although reducing, leaders are aware there is still work to do to reduce the higher-than-average proportion in two academies.

p.5

Summary findings

Not all governing body reports to parents on the academy’s use of the pupil premium are effective in helping parents to understand how well disadvantaged pupils are doing compared with non-disadvantaged pupils. Nor do the reports explain sufficiently clearly the extent to which academies are successful in closing the gaps between the achievements of each group compared with gaps found nationally. In order to ensure that governing bodies fulfil their duties, the trust has commissioned consultants to check current policies and to guide governing bodies and academy leaders in developing policies that meet local needs and statutory requirements, as well as representing good practice in the field.

p.5

Recommendations

 Ensure that actions identified to raise achievement of underachieving groups such as boys, disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs drive the required improvements and narrow further the gaps where they exist.  Work with all academy leaders to reduce the number of pupils who are persistently absent or temporarily excluded from the academies where rates remain too high.  Revisit the scheme of delegation to ensure that it takes account of changes to the trust’s size and makes clear the demarcation of roles and responsibilities of the trust board and local governing bodies.  Make sure that local governing bodies carry out their responsibilities in developing up-to-date policies that meet statutory requirements and ensure that policies are monitored and reviewed for impact within the required timescales.  Ensure that the strategic plan includes the future priorities of the trust and

p.5

Recommendations

explains how the trust will work with and communicate with parents and carers.  Refine improvement plans to ensure the trust’s board and academy leaders can check the impact of actions to bring about improvement taken by the staff in the academies in which they are working.

p.5

May 2015 (provis.)

Havercroft Academy North East Yorkshire and Humber Wakefield September Not previously inspected Overall effectiveness: requires improvement. Early Years Foundation Stage: good. Hemsworth Arts and Community Academy North East Yorkshire and Humber Wakefield September Not previously inspected Overall effectiveness: requires improvement

p.7

May 2015 (provis.)

West End Academy North East Yorkshire and Humber Wakefield October Not previously inspected Overall effectiveness: good

p.7

May 2015 (provis.)

Balby Carr Community Academy North East Yorkshire and Humber Doncaster November Not previously inspected Overall effectiveness requires improvement; sixth form: good

p.7

2015

Yewlands Technology College North East Yorkshire and Humber Sheffield September Grade 4 - serious weaknesses, March 2014 Making reasonable progress

p.7

and date

Wakefield City Academy North East Yorkshire and Humber Wakefield February Not previously inspected as an academy Grade 1 – outstanding, March 2013 Goole High School Academy North East Yorkshire and Humber East Riding of Yorkshire February Grade 4 - special measures, December 2013 Monitoring report April 2015: making reasonable progress Willow Academy North East Yorkshire and Humber Doncaster April 2012 Grade 4 - special measures, April 2013 Grade 3 - requires improvement, December 2014 Heath View Academy North East Yorkshire and Humber Wakefield September Not previously inspected Not yet inspected as an academy

p.8

and date

Montague Academy North East Yorkshire and Humber Doncaster May 2014 Not previously inspected Not yet inspected as an academy

p.8

grade and date

Carr Lodge Academy North East Yorkshire and Humber Doncaster To open September 2015 Not yet inspected as an academy

p.8

grade and date

Create Studio North East Yorkshire and Humber East Riding of Yorkshire Closing and being merged with Goole High School Academy.

p.8

grade and date

Mexborough Academy North East Yorkshire and Humber Doncaster January 2015 Not yet inspected as an academy

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion