Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Royal School, Manchester

Inspected — · published 17 Nov 2011 · URN 106166

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    SK8 6RQ

  • Name on report verified

    Royal College Manchester

  • URN verified

    106166

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
24
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
8 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Published date November 2011 Inspection Number 376160 Unique reference number: 106166

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Sue Harrison HMI

p.1

Type of provider: Independent specialist college

p.1

Address:

Stanley Road Cheadle Hulme Cheshire SK8 6RQ

p.1

Address:

Telephone number: 0161 610 0100 Royal College Manchester

p.1

Focused monitoring visit report

Focused monitoring visit: Royal College Manchester, 13 October 2011 2 of 5

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Royal College Manchester offers day and residential provision to learners who have significant communication difficulties, often combined with complex medical needs or physical disabilities, as well as learning difficulties. The college is part of the Seashell Trust and shares an extensive site with the Royal School. All 44 learners are aged 19–25 and half of them are residential. They come from 22 local authorities. The aim of the college is to help learners progress to supported employment, further study, supported living and full participation in the community, according to their individual needs.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The college was inspected in 2007 and was judged to be good. A monitoring visit in 2010 found significant progress in strengthening safeguarding procedures and reasonable progress in the other aspects inspected. This monitoring visit focuses on the themes outlined below.

p.2

progress

All staff are engaged in self-assessment through a range of activities, including team meetings and completing questionnaires. Staff also have individual performance management meetings where targets are set. Links with other providers help staff to benchmark the college’s strengths and areas for development. Staff are keen to bring about further improvement. They can cite examples of current priorities, such as increasing the involvement of learners in developing the provision. However, staff teams require further help to assist them in evaluating their work, rather than just describing it. The staffing restructure, currently underway, is aimed partly at strengthening this aspect of team management. Developments are also taking place to enhance the monitoring of the college at board level. A separate governing body for the college is due to be in place from December 2011. Plans are well advanced to

p.2

progress

ensure that the board has appropriate expertise to provide sufficient challenge when monitoring the rigour of the college’s self-assessment, as well as assessing the work of the board itself.

p.2

progress

The college continues to be effective in the development of learners’ communication skills. Learners satisfactorily increase their ability to communicate with others through the use of specialist equipment and input from therapists. As a result, they Focused monitoring visit: Royal College Manchester, 13 October 2011 3 of 5

p.2

progress

are able to make more choices and participate in a wider range of activities within the college and the community. The development of work-related skills is more limited. Good examples exist of learners gaining increased confidence and independence through supported work placements. The college identifies the need to extend this programme where it is appropriate for learners. Within the current year, plans are well advanced to introduce a number of new placements. In addition, a new role of jobcoach is being introduced to expand links with employers. Learners already benefit from the work the college carries out with employers to divide up the tasks in a job. This enables a team of learners to carry out specific tasks that are suited to them individually to develop their skills and abilities.

p.3

progress

The college continues to improve its target setting and monitoring processes. A major step forward is the integration of targets across the educational and care settings. This ensures all staff are aware of learners’ core targets and staff are using these increasingly effectively in devising activities to help learners make progress. Systems to record targets and progress are much improved and they enable managers to see much more easily what progress learners are making across all their sessions. However, some of the targets set last year were still too general. Further work has taken place to eliminate this problem. The targets set for new learners joining the college this year make good use of the outcomes of initial assessment to set sharper and more appropriate targets. The college is also considering introducing a simple, visual method of recording to enable staff to see at a glance the progress made by learners in fulfilling their targets. This is also aimed at

p.3

progress

involving learners more fully in the process.

p.3

progress

The system to monitor the effectiveness of teaching and learning has improved since the last inspection. All teaching and support staff are observed working with learners, and the college works effectively with other providers to moderate its judgements. The college has a very realistic understanding of the quality of its lessons and last year judged over half to be good or better. Learners benefit from a sharper focus on learning during the observations. The college takes action to improve teaching and support where weaknesses are identified. However, it recognises that the pace of improvement has been too slow. Changes have been implemented to strengthen further its observation process. These include more opportunities for staff to observe each other’s work and to spread good practice in what constitutes effective learning for learners with complex needs. In addition, plans are in place to develop further the levels of specialist expertise within the staff

p.3

progress

to respond to the increasing complexity of learners’ needs. Focused monitoring visit: Royal College Manchester, 13 October 2011 4 of 5

p.3

progress

The college continues to make significant progress in maintaining and developing further its safeguarding systems. This includes regular and effective training for staff. Within the college, aspects of the training are delivered by national organisations with specialist expertise in safeguarding. In addition, staff attend sessions run by the local authority. Following training, new staff are required to demonstrate their knowledge and understanding of safeguarding procedures during their probationary period. Annual update training for all staff is delivered using interesting methods that fully engage staff and develop their skills and confidence in implementing safeguarding procedures. The effectiveness of the training is monitored very thoroughly. A safeguarding board, which includes members from external agencies, rigorously audits staff awareness and record keeping in the college. Since the last

p.4

progress

inspection, the college has made significant progress to develop learners’ understanding of safety. Staff are very aware of the vulnerability of learners with severe communication and other disabilities. They use practical activities very successfully to increase learners’ understanding of their rights and responsibilities. Focused monitoring visit: Royal College Manchester, 13 October 2011 5 of 5

p.4

progress

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.

p.5

progress

To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’. Ofsted

p.5

progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion