Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Armthorpe Tranmoor Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Oct 2005
- Inspectorssingle source
Jeremy Richardson
- Achievement verified
Inadequate
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
DN3 3DB
- Name on report verified
Armthorpe Tranmoor Primary School
- URN verified
106753
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- AchievementInadequate
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningInadequate
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.9
- Relationships are very positive and the pupils feel safe and secure. p.4
- The headteacher built effective relationships with the community and established successfully an extended school. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The achievement and standards of the pupils are inadequate. p.4
- Standards on entry to the nursery vary each year and are usually below average. p.4
- In the Foundation Stage, children make good progress in most areas of learning, including personal development. 2 Inspection Report: Armthorpe Tranmoor Primary School, 5 October 2005 to 6 October 2005 In 2005, by the time the children started in Year 1, they achieved above the local authority (LA) average. p.4
- Standards in the national tests at the end of Year 2 in 2004 were below average and too few of the pupils achieved the higher levels. p.4
- The provisional results in 2005 are slightly lower. p.4
- In particular, standards in reading have declined considerably and are now below average. p.4
- However, the school's most recent assessment shows them to be improving. p.4
- The results achieved in the national tests at the end of Year 6 in 2004 were average but the trend in the school's results is below the national one. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,649
- about usual (typical 3071)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 44
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Armthorpe Tranmoor Primary School
p.1
106753 Unique Reference Number Doncaster LEA 277622 Inspection number 5 October 2005 to 6 October 2005 Inspection dates Mr Jeremy Richardson HMI Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Tranmoor Lane School address Primary Type of school Armthorpe Community School category Doncaster, South Yorkshire DN3 3DB 3 to 11 Age range of pupils
p.1
01302 831720 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01302 832038 Fax number 449 Number on roll Mrs E Butler Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs S Bean Headteacher 11 October 1999 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 277622 5 October 2005 - 3 to 11 6 October 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by Her Majesty's Inspector and two additional inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
Armthorpe Tranmoor Primary School is situated in Doncaster; it is much larger than average. As an extended school, the school provides childcare during the day and in a breakfast club and after-school club. The proportion of the pupils eligible for free school meals is average. Few of the pupils speak English as an additional language and the proportion of the pupils designated as having special educational needs is average. Following a fire that caused considerable disruption, the school was rebuilt and opened in September 2001.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Armthorpe Tranmoor Primary School, 5 October 2005 to 6 October 2005
p.3
Grade: 4
In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a Notice to Improve. Significant improvement is required in relation to: the pupils' standards of attainment in Key Stage 1; their progress in Key Stage 2; the quality of teaching; and the rigour of arrangements for checking and improving teaching. Following a period of considerable disruption caused by the fire, the school improved the pupils' behaviour and established a warm and positive ethos in which every child really does matter. The headteacher built effective relationships with the community and established successfully an extended school. The school knows that there are weaknesses in standards of reading in Key Stage 1 and its comprehensive range of
p.4
Grade: 4
strategies to tackle these is starting to have an impact. The school has begun to address underachievement in Key Stage 2 but there is still some way to go; too many of the pupils, particularly the boys, do not make the progress they should. The school does not have a reliable picture of the quality of teaching because arrangements for checking teaching and improving performance are not rigorous enough. Overall teaching is inadequate; some of the work lacks challenge and time in lessons is not always used well. Arrangements for care, guidance and support are good, with some very good features. Relationships are very positive and the pupils feel safe and secure. They behave well in lessons and around the school. The school successfully promotes healthy lifestyles; this has been recognised with an award. Provision in the Foundation Stage is managed well and is good; children make good progress. The school provides inadequate value for money but does have the
p.4
Grade: 4
capacity to build on previous improvements.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
The school needs to: • raise attainment in Key Stage 1, especially in reading and improving the pupils' progress with particular emphasis on boys in Key Stage 2; • improve the quality of teaching by making sure pupils are challenged and learn at a good pace; • increase the rigour of systems for checking and improving teaching.
p.4
Grade: 4
The achievement and standards of the pupils are inadequate. Standards on entry to the nursery vary each year and are usually below average. In the Foundation Stage, children make good progress in most areas of learning, including personal development. 2 Inspection Report: Armthorpe Tranmoor Primary School, 5 October 2005 to 6 October 2005 In 2005, by the time the children started in Year 1, they achieved above the local authority (LA) average. Standards in the national tests at the end of Year 2 in 2004 were below average and too few of the pupils achieved the higher levels. The provisional results in 2005 are slightly lower. In particular, standards in reading have declined considerably and are now below average. However, the school's most recent assessment shows them to be improving. The results achieved in the national tests at the end of Year 6 in 2004 were average but the trend in the school's results is below the national one. The 2005 figures were similar to those
p.4
Grade: 4
achieved in 2004 and the school missed its targets. In 2004, progress in Key Stage 2 was below the expected rate overall. It was reasonable in science but too many of the pupils underachieved in mathematics and English, and many of the boys did not make enough progress. The provisional results for 2005 suggest that progress has deteriorated, although the school's additional focused support with Year 6 did have a positive effect. The pupils who have learning difficulties and/or disabilities make satisfactory progress.
p.5
Grade: 2
Personal development and well-being is good. Pupils look forward to coming to school and are proud of their achievements. The school has made improving pupils' behaviour a priority. Thanks to the well-coordinated strategies employed by the school, and helped by the LA, behaviour in lessons and in the playgrounds is now good overall. The school places more responsibility on pupils for their conduct and there is a well-developed system of rewards and sanctions. Attendance levels are just below national averages but are improving. The school enjoys a very good site and resources and uses these well and with imagination to provide opportunities for pupils to take part in a wide range of sporting, social, artistic and academic activities at breaks and after school. The commitment of staff to organising and running these activities is high and is a very positive feature. The school promotes healthy lifestyles through
p.5
Grade: 2
physical activity and holds the Healthy Schools Award. Pupils are enthusiastic about the high quality of their school meals. Health-and-safety arrangements are thorough. The school council and buddy system give pupils responsibility and a voice in the running of the school. Pupils contribute to the community in a number of ways including fundraising for charities, performing in shows and concerts, and through visits.
p.5
Grade: 4
The school judges teaching and learning as satisfactory. However, the inspection team judges them to be inadequate. While teaching is frequently adequate or better, there are too many inadequate lessons and groups of pupils who make unsatisfactory progress 3 Inspection Report: Armthorpe Tranmoor Primary School, 5 October 2005 to 6 October 2005 in learning, especially in Key Stage 2. Expectations are too low: tasks do not always stretch pupils and lessons sometimes have a slow pace. Some pupils say that some of their work is not challenging enough and teachers spend a long time explaining work that is easy. In good lessons, exciting and demanding activities, including the use of film clips, capture the pupils' attention and enable them to make good progress towards sharply focused learning objectives. Behaviour is good as a result of effective steps to deal with misconduct. Most pupils are keen and enjoy learning. Steps to improve learning in Key Stage 1 are
p.5
Grade: 4
starting to make an impact on pupils' progress, particularly in reading. The involvement of parents in their children's learning is contributing to this improvement. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities learn well and make satisfactory progress, with good progress in reading as a result of successful help from learning support assistants. Although, assessment procedures are satisfactory, the marking of pupils' work does not always clearly tell pupils what they need to do to improve. Teaching and learning in the Foundation Stage are satisfactory and frequently good. Good use is made of the well-resourced outdoor area to promote learning.
p.6
Grade: 3
The curriculum satisfactorily meets the needs and interests of the pupils. Statutory requirements are met. Steps to improve reading have begun to raise standards. Other basic skills, including information and communication technology (ICT), are satisfactorily promoted. Due regard is given to health and safety. The curriculum is effectively enriched through a wide range of after-school activities, especially those linked to music and computers. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are well provided for. Personal development is given a high priority, with pupils eager to spend time in the 'bungalow' and experience the sensory activities available. Provision in the Foundation Stage is good; in particular the planning helps children move smoothly from the nursery to the reception classes.
p.6
Grade: 2
This extended school takes good care of all of its pupils. The school is warm and welcoming to parents and visitors. Pupils feel very safe and secure and know who they can turn to for help. Parents write and speak very positively about the quality of the school's input into the education and wellbeing of their children. The contribution of the Ruskin Positive Play Centre to the care and safety of all pupils is good, particularly so for the vulnerable children. Pupils say that bullying has decreased and is now very rare. Arrangements for assessing pupils' personal and academic progress are satisfactory and improving. Procedures for child protection and health and safety are very well established and there are good links with outside agencies. The school strongly encourages healthy eating and physical activity and has effective programmes for sex, drug and health education. 4 Inspection Report: Armthorpe Tranmoor Primary School, 5 October 2005 to 6 October 2005
p.6
Grade: 3
The leadership and management of the school are satisfactory. The headteacher and the senior staff have led the school through a difficult period, securing improvements to behaviour and establishing a positive ethos in which every member of the school community is valued highly. Governors are loyal and supportive of the school and have a thorough grasp of its performance. The headteacher has secured the loyalty of her hardworking staff and has dealt well with unforeseen staffing difficulties. She has actively sought the views of parents and built relationships with them. Her vision for the school is shared by the rest of the staff. She has established a range of appropriate systems for managing the school. However, arrangements for checking and improving the teaching lack rigour and the school overscores the quality of teaching. Some of the co-ordinators have produced insightful evaluations of their areas, which inform
p.7
Grade: 3
action plans that underpin the school development plan. A comprehensive range of strategies to improve reading in Key Stage 1 is proving successful. Although some gains have been made, plans to tackle the underachievement in Key Stage 2 have not yet had the required impact. The Foundation Stage is led well. The headteacher has led the successful establishment of an extended school that provides good care and support for children before and after school. Arrangements for reducing teachers' workload have been implemented successfully and further plans to review staffing are well advanced. Currently, the school provides inadequate value for money but has the capacity to improve. 5 Inspection Report: Armthorpe Tranmoor Primary School, 5 October 2005 to 6 October 2005 .
p.7
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Armthorpe Tranmoor Primary School, 5 October 2005 to 6 October 2005
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 4 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 4 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 4 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Thank you for letting us come and visit your school. We enjoyed watching you learn. We liked talking to you about your work and speaking to your teachers. We are writing to tell you what we found out when we inspected your school. By now you have probably heard that your school needs a Notice to Improve. There are some things that need to be improved so that you can learn better. - Some of you do not learn as much as you could in lessons, especially in Key Stage 2. - In some lessons, the work is not hard enough and some of you told us teachers spent too long explaining things that were easy for you. - Although the school checks how good the teaching is, it does not always get it right. The things that need to be improved can be sorted out. Your school has some real strengths. - The children in the nursery and reception classes learn well. - All of the adults in the school work very hard and take good care of you.
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
- You behave well and like coming to school. - You told us you enjoy all the activities the school provides at playtime, during lunch and after school.
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion