Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Great Staughton Pre- School (Piglets)
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
The Great Staughton Pre-School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP517174
- Inspection date verified
21 Jun 2018
- Inspectors verified
Julia Sudbury
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
PE19 5BP
- Name on report verified
Great Staughton Pre- School (Piglets)
- URN verified
221745
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Weaknesses in leadership and management mean children's safety, welfare and learning are compromised. p.4
- Due to the weakness in teaching and assessment, children do not make good progress in all areas of learning. p.4
- The manager and committee members lack a suitable understanding of the procedure to follow in the event of an allegation of harm or abuse made against a member of staff. p.1
- The provider has failed to ensure there is a named deputy who can take charge in the manager's absence. p.1
- The pre-school manager and members of the committee have a poor understanding and knowledge of the procedures to follow should an allegation be made against a member of staff. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- appoint a named deputy to take charge in the manager's absence 22/07/2018 p.2
- ensure all staff, including the management committee, gain a secure understanding of the safeguarding procedures and practice, including the procedures to follow should an allegation be made about a member of staff 22/07/2018 p.2
- ensure an accurate daily record of children's names and hours of attendance is consistently maintained 22/07/2018 p.2
- strengthen the arrangements for staff supervision to identify weaknesses in teaching and target support to raise the quality of observations, assessments and planning 22/07/2018 p.2
- ensure the key-person system is used effectively to meet children's individual care needs 22/07/2018 p.2
- improve the assessment of children's progress to ensure that any child who is at risk of falling behind is quickly identified and supported to make the best possible progress in their learning and development 22/07/2018 p.2
- ensure the progress check for children aged between two and three years is carried out. 22/07/2018 p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health2
“This means children's safety and well-being is not assured.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 869
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 7
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Great Staughton Pre- School (Piglets) The Playing field, Great Staughton, ST. NEOTS, Cambridgeshire, PE19 5BP
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 21 June 2018 10 November 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The manager and committee members lack a suitable understanding of the procedure to follow in the event of an allegation of harm or abuse made against a member of staff. This compromises children's welfare. The provider has failed to ensure there is a named deputy who can take charge in the manager's absence. A daily record of the hours of children's attendance is not always completed accurately. The cycle of observation, assessment and planning that supports children's ongoing learning is not robust. This has a negative impact on children, including those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Furthermore, staff do not carry out the required progress check for children aged between two and three years. Staff do not receive effective support and supervision to help them raise their teaching skills to a good level. The key-person system is not effectively implemented to support children in their
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children enjoy playing in the outdoor area and show great delight as they engage in high energy, physical activities. Children behave well. Staff support them consistently in learning to take turns and share.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
appoint a named deputy to take charge in the manager's absence 22/07/2018 ensure all staff, including the management committee, gain a secure understanding of the safeguarding procedures and practice, including the procedures to follow should an allegation be made about a member of staff 22/07/2018
p.2
Due Date
ensure an accurate daily record of children's names and hours of attendance is consistently maintained 22/07/2018
p.2
Due Date
strengthen the arrangements for staff supervision to identify weaknesses in teaching and target support to raise the quality of observations, assessments and planning 22/07/2018
p.2
Due Date
ensure the key-person system is used effectively to meet children's individual care needs 22/07/2018
p.2
Due Date
improve the assessment of children's progress to ensure that any child who is at risk of falling behind is quickly identified and supported to make the best possible progress in their learning and development 22/07/2018
p.2
Due Date
ensure the progress check for children aged between two and three years is carried out. 22/07/2018
p.2
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. She spoke to children and staff at appropriate times during the inspection. The inspector completed a joint observation with the pre-school manager. The inspector held a meeting with the pre-school manager and members of the committee. The inspector also looked at relevant documentation, such as children's learning records and evidence of the suitability of staff and committee members. The inspector spoke to a number of parents during the inspection and took account of their views.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is ineffective. The pre-school manager and members of the committee have a poor understanding and knowledge of the procedures to follow should an allegation be made against a member of staff. Furthermore, a written record of children's hours of attendance is not always completed and the provider has not made sure there is a named deputy. This means children's safety and well-being is not assured. Nevertheless, most staff understand the signs and symptoms of possible abuse and know who they should report concerns. There is a robust recruitment proses in place to ensure staff are suitable. The premises are clean and risk assessments are carried out to ensure equipment is safe. Staff have undertaken food hygiene training and the pre-school has implemented an effective filing system so that required paperwork is easily accessible. Although staff are qualified, there are significant weaknesses in supporting children's learning and
p.4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
development. Staff do not benefit from thorough supervisory meetings to help them provide a strong learning environment. Despite the weaknesses, parents are complimentary about the pre-school. They find the staff welcoming and report that their children are happy. Parents' permission is sought for the use of photographs on the pre- school's digital platforms.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
Children's whose development is lower than typical for their age are not identified quickly or supported robustly to catch up with their peers. While staff carry out some observations, these are not consistently linked to areas of learning. As a result, staff do not have an accurate picture of children's abilities across the seven areas of learning and do not plan to effectively to meet children's developmental needs. Furthermore, systems to track children's progress are not being carried out regularly enough to ensure all children are making good progress. The next steps in children's learning are not focused enough to support their development and planning is not followed. As a result, staff do not extend children's thinking skills or to help them become confident talkers. Nevertheless, staff show an understanding of children's learning styles and provide an environment that offers some stimulation and engages their interests.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Weaknesses in leadership and management mean children's safety, welfare and learning are compromised. Furthermore, although children are assigned a key person, this does not ensure that all children's care is tailored to meet their individual needs, particularly in relation to personal care. This effects some children's emotional well-being. However, children are learning about keeping themselves healthy and well. Children enjoy healthy snacks and regularly help themselves to drinks. Staff have made links with the local primary school teachers to help support children in preparation for their eventual move on to school.
p.4
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Due to the weakness in teaching and assessment, children do not make good progress in all areas of learning. They are not supported well enough to become successful learners who are well prepared for the next stage in their learning, including their eventual move on to school. However, children are learning to play alongside their peers and to take turns and share.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 221745 Local authority Cambridgeshire Inspection number 1139301 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 25 Number of children on roll 17 Name of registered person The Great Staughton Pre-School Committee
p.6
reference number
Date of previous inspection 10 November 2015 Telephone number 07759 382575
p.6
reference number
Great Staughton Pre-School (Piglets) registered in 1977. It operates Monday to Thursday 9am to 3pm, term time only. There are two permanent staff, one of whom holds a qualification at level 4. The pre-school provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.6
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.7
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion