Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
13 Jun 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Gary Tostevin
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
KT15 2QH
- Name on report verified
Philip Southcote School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The routines and values you have put in place are respected by all, resulting in exemplary behaviour throughout the school. p.1
- We also evaluated how effectively leaders monitor and evaluate lessons to ensure that all pupil groups make strong progress in relation to their starting points. p.2
- As a result of your firm commitment, pupils are supported well and thrive at Philip Southcote School. p.1
- You lead the school with clear determination and passion to see pupils engage in learning and make good progress from their starting points. p.1
- The vast majority of staff who responded to the staff survey said that they are proud to work at the school and enjoy working there. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment8
“Teaching is typically highly effective.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 966
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Mary Rome Headteacher Philip Southcote School Addlestone Moor Addlestone Surrey KT15 2QH
p.1
Short inspection of Philip Southcote School
Following my visit to the school on 13 June 2018 with Ofsted Inspector Ross Macdonald, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of Philip Southcote School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Short inspection of Philip Southcote School
You lead the school with clear determination and passion to see pupils engage in learning and make good progress from their starting points. You are supported ably by your senior leaders, who share your vision and drive for the pupils at the school. Teachers and support staff follow your expectation that all pupils should achieve their best. The vast majority of staff who responded to the staff survey said that they are proud to work at the school and enjoy working there. As a result of your firm commitment, pupils are supported well and thrive at Philip Southcote School.
p.1
Short inspection of Philip Southcote School
Pupils say that they enjoy coming to school. They say that staff support them well by setting work that is tailored to their needs. One pupil remarked, ‘Lessons are really good because the teachers know what helps each person.’ Pupils get to lessons quickly and are ready to learn from the outset. The routines and values you have put in place are respected by all, resulting in exemplary behaviour throughout the school. The overwhelming majority of parents and carers are supportive of the school. They feel it is well led, with one parent saying: ‘The headteacher has created a very nice atmosphere in the school. All the teachers and herself are very approachable and if children have any problems, they can go straight to her.’
p.1
Short inspection of Philip Southcote School
Leaders and governors have successfully addressed the areas identified for improvement at the previous inspection. A new school-wide approach to monitoring progress has been introduced. Leaders and staff use this system effectively, helping them to develop a firm grip on the progress of current pupils. In addition, a highly developed focus on reading permeates the curriculum, allowing pupils to access a wide range of learning experiences. The work in pupils’ books demonstrates that they make good progress over time. Teaching is typically highly effective. However, occasionally, it is not as strong in some classes as it is in others.
p.1
Short inspection of Philip Southcote School
The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are effective. The single central record details accurately the robust employment checks that leaders carry out on staff and other adults in the school. Adults are trained appropriately in all areas of child protection and know what actions to take to keep pupils safe from harm.
p.2
Short inspection of Philip Southcote School
The school works effectively with other agencies to make sure that pupils are safe. Staff maintain useful relationships with a range of other professionals to support highly vulnerable pupils.
p.2
Short inspection of Philip Southcote School
You and your staff show a strong commitment to pupils’ well-being. Pupils say that they feel safe and know how to keep themselves safe. They know who to speak to if they are worried.
p.2
Inspection findings
During the inspection, we evaluated leaders’ actions to improve attendance. We also evaluated how effectively leaders monitor and evaluate lessons to ensure that all pupil groups make strong progress in relation to their starting points. We further evaluated how well the governing body holds leaders to account for the current and future success of the school. Leaders’ effective action has led to a rise in attendance. Key staff challenge absence and expectations are high. Effective monitoring routines are now in place, with a high increase in direct contact with parents. On the occasions that pupils do not attend school, staff work determinedly to find out why and to establish where they are. Pupils respond well to this high level of care and many are attending more regularly. However, you acknowledge that there is more work to be done so that attendance rates continue to improve. A rigorous system for monitoring pupils’ progress is now in place. This is starting
p.2
Inspection findings
to cascade through all areas of the curriculum and is driving the planning to increase challenge in lessons. However, there are still areas where teachers’ assessments are not accurate enough to enable pupils to make the most progress. You have designed a curriculum that uses reading as a vehicle for progress. Changing the school day to include a bespoke reading session that includes the entire school community has transformed attitudes. For example, in an art lesson, inspectors observed pupils asking to stand and read to the class about artists that they had been researching. They read with enjoyment and confidence and with the full support of their audience. You have a passionate and committed governing body that brings a wide range of skills from outside of education to the strategic leadership of the school. This wider knowledge and expertise have enabled you to build on accountability at all
p.2
Inspection findings
levels, resulting in standards being driven upwards. Members of the governing body are rigorous in their pursuit of high standards, challenging leaders during scheduled meetings and visiting regularly to check the validity of leaders’ reports. Like school leaders, governors have a very accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement. They appreciate the work of staff and are keen to support you with the school’s next steps.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
teachers’ assessments of pupils’ achievement are consistent across all subject areas attendance continues to improve.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Surrey. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
We observed teaching and learning and scrutinised samples of pupils’ work in all areas of the school. Most observations were undertaken jointly with senior leaders.
p.3
Information about the inspection
We held meetings with you, senior leaders and support staff, as well as meeting the chair of the governing body accompanied by two governors. A telephone call was held with a representative of the local authority. We scrutinised a range of documents, including leaders’ evaluations of school performance, minutes from governors’ meetings, school policies, safeguarding records, records of attendance and behaviour, information about pupils’ progress and the school website. We spoke to pupils during the school day. We also took into account 25 responses on Ofsted’s online questionnaire for staff and eight responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion