Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Lite (Stockport) Limited

Inspected — · published 12 Jul 2018 · URN 53068

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Shahram Safavi

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SK1 1DY

  • Name on report verified

    Lite (Stockport) Limited

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+26Mostly positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyhigh-qualityeffectiveexcellenthigh expectationsgood progressconfidentfeel safe
Criticismconcernsnot alwaysweaknessesnot yetat risknot effectivenot consistentlylimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1072w+23
  • What needs to improve84w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,144
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Jackie Shopland-Reed Managing Director Lite (Stockport) Limited 23 Fletcher Street Stockport Cheshire SK1 1DY

p.1

Short inspection of Lite (Stockport) Limited

Following the short inspection on 19 and 20 June 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The inspection was the first short inspection carried out since the provider was judged to be good in June 2015.

p.1

Short inspection of Lite (Stockport) Limited

You and your staff have high ambitions for your apprentices and are passionate about their future employment prospects in the veterinary and animal-care sectors. Your tutors and assessors have a good knowledge of individual apprentices. They support them very effectively to develop the knowledge, skills and the confidence they require to work in animal-care settings.

p.1

Short inspection of Lite (Stockport) Limited

You have made good progress towards eliminating the weaknesses identified at the previous inspection. You have also developed aspects of your provision, for example by using social media to communicate with your apprentices. You have a clear understanding of the provision and are determined to ensure that it meets your high expectations.

p.1

Short inspection of Lite (Stockport) Limited

You and your staff know the reasons that only around seven in every 10 apprentices completed by their planned end date in 2016/17. Your actions to improve completion times are not yet effective. In the current year, your data indicates that the improvement in the proportion of apprentices who are likely to complete by their planned end date is marginal. You recognised the developments that are required to improve the learning facilities in St Helens and are at an advanced stage of making these improvements.

p.1

Short inspection of Lite (Stockport) Limited

You and your staff have ensured that policies and procedures to keep apprentices safe are up to date, fit for purpose and implemented appropriately. Staff are confident to report any incidents or safeguarding concerns. They work with external agencies effectively to reduce risks to apprentices, for example when an apprentice is at risk of becoming homeless.

p.1

Short inspection of Lite (Stockport) Limited

Apprentices benefit from lessons, appropriate activities and useful discussions that extend their knowledge and understanding of how to safeguard themselves in different settings, for example, when using social media. Apprentices feel safe and know how to report their concerns. All staff are aware of their responsibility to protect apprentices from the risks associated with radicalisation and extremism. However, assessors do not record apprentices’ knowledge and understanding of extremism and radicalisation during their reviews.

p.2

Inspection findings

 You and your staff take effective action to ensure that good or better practices in teaching, learning and assessment are shared and implemented across the sites in Stockport and St Helens and between veterinary-nursing and animal- care apprenticeships. Your staff have increased significantly the range of resources for animal-care apprentices in the virtual learning environment. Animal-care apprentices use these resources effectively to enhance their learning.  Partnership working with employers is particularly effective. It ensures that most apprentices receive high-quality on-the-job training and develop good veterinary and animal-care skills. The booklet that your staff have developed for animal-care employers is excellent and supports employers in their delivery of good and effective training of their apprentices.  Veterinary-nursing apprentices receive high-quality on-the-job training from clinical coaches in veterinary practices. Clinical coaches work very effectively with

p.2

Inspection findings

tutors to prepare apprentices for the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons’ assessments. As a result, the proportion of apprentices who are successful in this assessment is high.  Tutors and assessors produce and use high-quality and relevant resources to stimulate apprentices’ interest in, and extend their understanding of, fair treatment, diversity and British values. In-depth and meaningful discussions and debates on topical ethical, political and social issues, such as Ramadan, the royal wedding, fly-tipping and General Data Protection Regulation, help to prepare apprentices for life and work in modern Britain.  Tutors and assessors are highly dedicated and responsive to apprentices’ pastoral and learning needs. They work collaboratively with apprentices’ employers to resolve any issues and remove barriers to apprentices’ success, for example when they experience personal difficulties.  Tutors use their good knowledge of veterinary nursing and animal care in lessons

p.2

Inspection findings

to ensure that apprentices have a sound understanding of relevant aspects of veterinary and animal-care practices. Most tutors check apprentices’ understanding of key topics effectively, for example through questioning. As a result, apprentices, particularly veterinary-nursing apprentices, apply their theoretical knowledge to improve their clinical practice effectively. Apprentices who have significant experience within the sector prior to enrolment demonstrate good development of a wide range of new knowledge and skills as a result of their apprenticeship training.  A minority of tutors and assessors are not proficient in helping apprentices to develop their writing skills further. For example, they wrongly correct apprentices’ accurate use of apostrophes.  The assessors’ review of apprentices’ progress is not consistently good. Assessors visit apprentices regularly in their workplace to review their learning and set them

p.2

Inspection findings

learning targets and tasks. The targets are not always sufficiently challenging to match the apprentices’ abilities and potentials; they merely relate to achievements of units of qualifications and their assessments rather than extending their knowledge and skills. Assessors use a wide range of documents to monitor apprentices’ progress. However, the complexity of the documents means that apprentices cannot always gain a clear understanding of their overall progress. For example, assessors use percentages as measures of apprentices’ overall progress on review documents, but other documents do not indicate the same percentages of progress. During review meetings, assessors’ checking of apprentices’ concerns about bullying and harassment at work is not specific enough and requires improvement.  In 2016/17, the proportion of veterinary-nursing and animal-care apprentices who completed their qualification successfully was high. However, the proportion

p.3

Inspection findings

who completed by their planned end date was not high enough. This was because staff did not always use apprentices’ starting points and barriers to plan their programmes sufficiently. For example, apprentices, regardless of their ability and experience, were allocated the same length of time to complete their apprenticeships while a few needed a longer time to do so. In 2017/18, changes made to improve the proportion of apprentices who complete by their planned end date are not yet effective.  Apprentices receive appropriate impartial information, advice and guidance about their apprenticeship and progression opportunities. Most apprentices continue in their employment after they complete their programme. Many veterinary-nursing apprentices gain additional responsibilities, for example they become clinical coaches. Animal-care apprentices achieve their career plans, for example to gain experience in animal-care settings for a few years.

p.3

Next steps for the provider

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the provider

 the proportion of apprentices who complete by their planned end date is increased as quickly as possible by ensuring that their starting points are used effectively to plan their learning and the length of their programme  reviews of apprentices’ learning and progress always provide apprentices with an accurate understanding of their progress. I am copying this letter to the Education and Skills Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

The inspection team consisted of one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and one Ofsted Inspector. You assisted us in your role of nominee. We held discussions with you and members of your staff. We observed teaching and learning sessions at your venues and on employers’ premises and spoke to apprentices and employers. We inspected key documents, including those related to safeguarding, self-assessment, and quality assurance. We also scrutinised apprentices’ work and analysed achievement and progress data.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion