Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Meadows Care Limited in Birmingham
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Meadows Care Limited
- Inspection date verified
24 May 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Christy Wannop
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Name on report verified
1240936
- URN verified
1240936
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRI to be good
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted. p.1
- Relationships between staff and the current children are positive because staff have time for them and feel confident looking after them. p.5
- Staff stability and experience have improved significantly as the team has grown and staff have become more confident. p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some previous children have been at risk from drug taking, at risk from gangs or vulnerable through self-harm or to exploitation, and some children have made significant violent challenges towards staff. p.6
- However, despite regular review by the manager, some children‟s in-house placement plans contain out-of-date information about their legal status or the progress of their therapeutic assessments, or lack detail about educational priorities. p.5
- For example, weaknesses in care planning and quality of managerial monitoring and review have recurred. p.6
- The manager delayed the opportunity to improve practice, which meant that better help for children was also delayed. p.6
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This particularly refers to having effective risk assessments and a manager‟s review in relation to children going missing from care. 31/08/2018 p.3
- This particularly refers to delivering stability and placement success to children and that information in their plans is accurate. 31/08/2018 p.3
- The registered person must ensure that all employees— p.3
- The system referred to in paragraph (2) must provide for ascertaining and considering the opinions of children, their parents, placing authorities and staff. p.4
- Ensure that managers anticipate difficulties and review incidents, such as learning from disruptions and placement breakdowns. p.4
- They are responsible for proactively implementing lessons learned and sustaining good practice. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance2
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,642
- about usual (typical 1899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children‟s home: 1240936 1 Registered provider: Meadows Care Limited
p.1
Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home is owned by a private company. It is one of four operated under a contract with a large local authority. It is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to three children who may have experienced trauma, placement and family breakdown.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The organisation‟s clinical psychologist provides a service to staff and children.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager has been registered since May 2018.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
requires improvement to be good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The children‟s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Date of last inspection: 2 November 2017
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Overall judgement at last inspection: sustained effectiveness
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report children‟s home: 1240936 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
02/11/2017 Interim Sustained effectiveness 13/06/2017 Full Requires improvement to be good Inspection report children‟s home: 1240936 3
p.2
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children‟s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the „Guide to the children‟s homes regulations including the quality standards‟. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.3
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.3
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—
p.3
Requirement Due date
that staff assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child‟s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;
p.3
Requirement Due date
take effective action whenever there is a serious concern about a child‟s welfare. (Regulation 12 (1)(a)(2)(a)(i)(vi))
p.3
Requirement Due date
This particularly refers to having effective risk assessments and a manager‟s review in relation to children going missing from care. 31/08/2018
p.3
Requirement Due date
The care planning standard is that children receive effectively planned care in or through the children‟s home; and have a positive experience of arriving at or moving on from the home.
p.3
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure that each child‟s relevant plans are followed. (Regulation 14 (1)(a)(b)(2)(c))
p.3
Requirement Due date
This particularly refers to delivering stability and placement success to children and that information in their plans is accurate. 31/08/2018
p.3
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that all employees—
p.3
Requirement Due date
receive practice-related supervision by a person with appropriate experience. ( Regulation 33 (4)) 31/08/2018
p.3
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that— 31/08/2018 Inspection report children‟s home: 1240936 4 within 24 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint in relation to a child in the home, a record is made which includes—
p.3
Requirement Due date
the date, time and location of the use of the measure;
p.4
Requirement Due date
a description of the measure and its duration;
p.4
Requirement Due date
within 48 hours of the use of the measure, the registered person, or a person who is authorised by the registered person to do so (“the authorised person”)—
p.4
Requirement Due date
has spoken to the user about the measure; and has signed the record to confirm it is accurate; and
p.4
Requirement Due date
within 5 days of the use of the measure, the registered person or the authorised person adds to the record confirmation that they have spoken to the child about the measure. (Regulation 35 (3)(a)(iii)(iv)(b)(i)(ii)(c)) The registered person must establish and maintain a system for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating—
p.4
Requirement Due date
the quality of care provided for children;
p.4
Requirement Due date
the feedback and opinions of children about the children‟s home, its facilities and the quality of care they receive in it; and any actions that the registered person considers necessary in order to improve or maintain the quality of care provided for children.
p.4
Requirement Due date
The system referred to in paragraph (2) must provide for ascertaining and considering the opinions of children, their parents, placing authorities and staff. (Regulation 45 (2)(a)(b)(c)(5)) 31/10/2018
p.4
Recommendations
Ensure that managers anticipate difficulties and review incidents, such as learning from disruptions and placement breakdowns. They are responsible for proactively implementing lessons learned and sustaining good practice. („Guide to the children‟s homes regulations including the quality standards‟, page 55, paragraph 10.24) Inspection report children‟s home: 1240936 5
p.4
improvement to be good
Currently placed children are making progress. They lead healthy lives and staff work creatively to discourage drug use. Children attend school and some children are making plans to start college in September. However, further improvement is needed to ensure that the manager is always aware of children‟s educational progress and attendance and any developing educational issues. Children have independence; this enables them to see their friends and participate in leisure activities in their home town. Children are currently making plans for their summer holiday.
p.5
improvement to be good
However, this level of progress has not been achieved for other children who have lived at the home since the last inspection in November 2017. Three children‟s placements ended early before the aims of the placement were achieved. Some children‟s needs have been beyond the ability of staff to care safely for them. For example, some children have experienced mental health crises. New children who have been distressed have disturbed the stability of children already in residence. The organisation has said they will now only accept planned placements in future, fully supported by accurate information.
p.5
improvement to be good
The organisation supports children and staff well through regular meetings and visits by the in-house psychologist. However, despite regular review by the manager, some children‟s in-house placement plans contain out-of-date information about their legal status or the progress of their therapeutic assessments, or lack detail about educational priorities.
p.5
improvement to be good
Children‟s views and wishes are prioritised by staff in regular direct-work sessions. Children learn life skills, talk about their issues and challenges and make plans with staff for their futures. Respect for children‟s culture, ethnicity and religion is central to the way staff care for them.
p.5
improvement to be good
Relationships between staff and the current children are positive because staff have time for them and feel confident looking after them. Staff are creative in their approach. For example, one member of staff uses personalised cartoons to help children find better paths in life. Staff go that extra mile by coming in on their days off to see children on their birthdays.
p.5
improvement to be good
The atmosphere created by the manager and staff for children and the people important to them is welcoming, collaborative and not institutional. Inspection report children‟s home: 1240936 6
p.5
improvement to be good
The extent of children‟s challenges and their need for protection have not always been known to the staff prior to children‟s placements commencing. Some previous children have been at risk from drug taking, at risk from gangs or vulnerable through self-harm or to exploitation, and some children have made significant violent challenges towards staff. Staff have struggled but have managed to keep children safe until more suitable placements can be found.
p.6
improvement to be good
If children go missing from the home, staff go out looking for them, as would a good parent, and give them a warm welcome on return. However, plans and risk assessments are not sufficiently individualised for each child and do not tell staff to make a report to the police immediately after the initial search or when they have lost sight of the child, as expected by the manager. The manager does not share information with local specialist police when there is a new child at risk of going missing from the home and has not picked up this delay in reporting or any inaccuracy in recording.
p.6
improvement to be good
The manager‟s formal review of incidents when staff have restrained children has also not identified that staff have not properly recorded the duration and technique used, or that, in some cases, children and staff have not had a debriefing about the restraint. This means that the manager does not always know that each restraint is safe and that everyone has been supported afterwards.
p.6
improvement to be good
Current children are engaged and cooperative with staff efforts to teach them about personal safety. Behaviour is currently well managed, and staff encourage children to think and put things right.
p.6
improvement to be good
Rigorous recruitment checks mean that only safe adults get to work with children.
p.6
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
The home is not yet delivering on its key purpose, described in the statement of purpose, to deliver stability to children. The level of admissions and discharges over the last 12 months has not delivered stability or placement success for the majority of children who have lived at the home since it opened in November 2016.
p.6
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Some regulatory issues found at this inspection were also identified by Ofsted last year under the previous registered manager. For example, weaknesses in care planning and quality of managerial monitoring and review have recurred. Progress in these areas has not been sustained.
p.6
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
The manager had not identified any lessons learned from incidents or placement endings as recommended at the last inspection until the inspection took place. The manager delayed the opportunity to improve practice, which meant that better help for children was also delayed. Inspection report children‟s home: 1240936 7 Children‟s views and wishes are clear in their records about their own care, and staff feel consulted and involved. However, the manager‟s review of the quality of care does not show how her informal consultation with them has influenced the development of the wider service. Children and staff are not included in how the service formally develops and improves.
p.6
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Staff stability and experience have improved significantly as the team has grown and staff have become more confident. This meets a regulatory shortfall raised at the last inspection. Staff are well trained to meet children‟s current needs and form a diverse and caring team. The home will be fully staffed in the month following the inspection.
p.7
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Although staff say that they get good support from their manager, they do not get the formal professional supervision they require in line with the organisation‟s policy. Long- standing agency staff have no formal supervision at all.
p.7
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
The organisation makes good challenges to the placing authority and other professionals, such as local police, when their support for children falls short. The home, with the current group of children, is at a significant point from which to demonstrate stability and continued improvement.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children‟s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Using the „Social care common inspection framework‟, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children‟s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the „Guide to the children‟s homes regulations including the quality standards‟. Inspection report children‟s home: 1240936 8
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Meadows Care Limited
p.8
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Meadows Care Limited, Egerton House, Wardle Road, Rochdale OL12 9EN
p.8
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Niel Shelmerdine
p.8
Children’s home details
Registered manager: Samantha Goodrickmeech
p.8
Inspector
Christy Wannop, social care inspector Inspection report children‟s home: 1240936 9 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children‟s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children‟s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion