Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Newhall Infant School

Inspected 19 Jun 2018 · published 9 Jul 2018 · URN 112636

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    19 Jun 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joanne Ward

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    DE11 0TJ

  • Name on report verified

    Newhall Infant School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyexcellentknowledgeableproudextremelystrongambitioushappy
Criticismtoo fewtoo slowlacksnot strongnot yetpersistent absencenot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1243w+58
  • What needs to improve103w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,335
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Neil Loftus Headteacher Newhall Infant and Nursery School Sunnyside Newhall Swadlincote Derbyshire DE11 0TJ

p.1

Short inspection of Newhall Infant School

Following my visit to the school on 19 June 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in November 2013.

p.1

Short inspection of Newhall Infant School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Newhall Infant and Nursery School is a happy, friendly school. Parents and carers are delighted to bring their children here. Without exception, every parent who spoke to me or who completed Parent View, the Ofsted online survey, would recommend the school to other parents. I was told about your detailed knowledge of each child and the care and interest you show, in some cases long after the child has left your school. Members of staff are equally warm and knowledgeable. The teachers are experienced and, like you, have been committed to the school over many years. Nevertheless, their energy and ambition to improve remain. They work together and with you to ensure that there is a consistency of good practice. Governors complete the team. They are knowledgeable and thoughtful, using their secure knowledge of the school gained

p.1

Short inspection of Newhall Infant School

from frequent visits, monitoring activities and reports from you and other leaders. To use their own words, they are ‘proud to be governors’ at Newhall Infant and Nursery School.

p.1

Short inspection of Newhall Infant School

Together, you have worked effectively since the last inspection. You were charged with closing the gap in attainment between mathematics and English. This has been done. Standards by the end of Reception have been consistently above national averages for the last three years, despite challenging beginnings for many of the children. In 2017, the school was above average in the percentage of pupils who reached the expected standard by the end of Year 2. However, too few pupils reached greater depth, so this was a focus for the inspection. I also looked at the achievement of disadvantaged pupils during key stage 1 because they did not do as well as their peers in 2017.

p.1

Short inspection of Newhall Infant School

The second area for improvement from the last inspection concerned the use of more precise targets in your planning so that leaders and governors can check on the success of actions to improve throughout the year. Since the last inspection, leaders have been developing the use of pupil progress information to ensure that pupils get extra help in a timely and effective way. Teachers know their pupils well. You and your senior leaders provide challenge to teachers and each other when pupils do not make progress. You have not yet translated that precision into improvement plans, another focus for this inspection.

p.2

Short inspection of Newhall Infant School

Pupils’ conduct makes an extremely positive contribution to their learning. They are expected to develop independence from an early age, and this bears fruit as they move through the school. They are eager to improve and they work well with each other on the range of activities provided in each lesson. Their ‘red books’ provide an account of how writing improves over the three or four years in school, from their first marks to well-crafted sentences and paragraphs. Handwriting is consistent, attractive and cursive by the end of Year 2 and the pupils are rightly proud of their work.

p.2

Short inspection of Newhall Infant School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Parents all say that their child feels safe at school. The site is secure and well maintained. It has been designed and equipped imaginatively so that pupils can explore social, creative and physical challenges, such as crossing the ‘Troll Bridge’, under careful supervision. Their excellent conduct plays a strong part in their feelings of safety. Staff are trained well and they know what to do if they are concerned about a pupil. Recruitment practices are secure and leaders are quick to respond if there are any areas of doubt.

p.2

Short inspection of Newhall Infant School

You are the designated safeguarding lead, supported by a small team of other leaders. You keep careful records which are stored securely. Your detailed knowledge of each child provides a depth and breadth to your work to keep children safe. The school works effectively with other agencies, including challenging them when their responses seem to be too slow. This is a school with children at its heart.

p.2

Inspection findings

 During the inspection, we discussed whether current improvement plans include clear criteria to explain what leaders are aiming to achieve. Leaders at all levels are now using pupil progress information much more effectively. For individual pupils, this is leading to timely interventions if progress stalls or if the pupil is ready for greater challenge. Governors receive regular reports about progress and they can talk confidently about the rigorous discussions they have had with school leaders. However, documents such as the school improvement plan and the pupil premium strategy do not use precise language to explain what success will look like. Therefore, although pupil progress is evident, governors cannot tell if it is happening fast enough relative to an ambitious goal set at the outset. In addition, leaders have not compared the achievement of disadvantaged pupils with other pupils nationally.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Governors monitor the work of the school with skill and sensitivity. Their own monitoring reports evaluate provision well, but the minutes of meetings do not reflect governors’ challenge of school leaders. As a result, there is no record to which governors can refer when they check on subsequent actions. Governors had already decided how to address this issue by the end of the inspection.  In 2017, although a high proportion of Year 2 pupils overall reached expected standards, not enough reached greater depth in their work. Leaders and governors had noticed this and swiftly responded with a focus on increasing the challenge for the most able pupils this year. Information about current pupils in Year 2 indicates that there are likely to be substantial gains in the proportion reaching greater depth in 2018. Leaders have endeavoured to ensure that their judgements about standards are accurate by checking them with other schools

p.3

Inspection findings

and at a formal moderation event.  Although there has been improvement overall, further work is needed to ensure that disadvantaged pupils achieve as well as their peers. For some of these pupils, persistent absence has meant that they do not benefit from the strong teaching which takes place in school. The school responds very quickly when these pupils are absent from school and there are individual examples where this has had considerable impact. However, the most recent published attendance information suggests that this is still an issue.  Leaders, teachers and support staff pay careful attention to the progress and needs of individual disadvantaged pupils. There is no doubt that these pupils are learning. However, leaders have not made comparison to the national rates of progress of pupils who are not disadvantaged and so cannot tell if they are learning fast enough. Planning documentation lacks precision about the impact

p.3

Inspection findings

that is expected from the targeted use of the pupil premium that is received to support them. Leaders are responding quickly to monitoring information about individual pupils but do not analyse performance of this group of pupils as a whole. Therefore, at this point, the improvement expected for Year 2 overall in 2018 is less certain for disadvantaged pupils.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 planning documentation, such as the pupil premium strategy, is further refined so that there are clear and appropriate goals which governors can refer to when they check on improvement throughout the year  the attendance and achievement of disadvantaged pupils improves, so that it is in line with that of non-disadvantaged pupils nationally who have similar starting points. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Derbyshire County Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I considered evidence from a range of sources, including the previous inspection report and information about the school’s performance in 2016 and 2017. I looked at the school’s website. I spoke with several parents at the gate and I considered 82 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, the Ofsted pupil and staff surveys and the results of recent school surveys of parents and of pupils. Meetings were held with you, school leaders and governors to discuss progress since the last inspection. I considered a range of documentation, including the school’s self- evaluation documents and improvement plans, the pupil premium strategy, evidence of leaders’ monitoring, governors’ minutes and visit reports, the single central record of the checks on staff and volunteers, a sample of recruitment files, the safeguarding policy and records of actions taken to protect pupils’ welfare. I talked with staff to make sure that they knew what to do if they were concerned

p.4

Information about the inspection

about a child. We jointly made visits to lessons, looked at the quality of work in pupils’ books and spoke with pupils. I talked to a representative of the local authority on the telephone. I talked to members of the school council who brought their work to show me and I observed the pupils at breaktimes.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion