Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Jun 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Diana Osagie
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
LU7 1EX
- Name on report verified
Leighton Middle School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance16
“You and your senior leaders have high expectations of staff.” p.1Wellbeing & mental health2
“Staff are mindful of pupils’ physical and mental well-being.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,112
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Vallance Headteacher Leighton Middle School Church Square Leighton Buzzard Bedfordshire LU7 1EX
p.1
Short inspection of Leighton Middle School
Following my visit to the school on 8 June 2018 with Shân Oswald, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in December 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of Leighton Middle School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You and your senior leaders have high expectations of staff. Leaders have created a nurturing culture where pupils are encouraged to excel academically and in a range of social and sporting activities. Strategies implemented to raise pupil attendance have been successful since your previous inspection. Attendance for all pupils is now above the national average.
p.1
Short inspection of Leighton Middle School
You and your leaders have worked hard to improve the quality of teaching since the previous inspection. You have implemented robust programmes for developing staff and monitoring lessons, which has led to a positive increase in the quality of lessons. You and your leaders are supported by a committed and able governing body that shares your aspirations for the school.
p.1
Short inspection of Leighton Middle School
Pupils are very happy at school. They cooperate well during lessons and are courteous to each other and adults. Pupils understand that staff have high expectations of them. You ensure that pupils follow a broad curriculum, including opportunities to study French weekly in key stage 2. Pupils told us that the lessons are interesting; for example, Year 5 pupils were analysing public census data and deciding for themselves whether they could trust the findings.
p.1
Short inspection of Leighton Middle School
You and your senior leaders have the overwhelming support of parents and carers, many of whom praise the care and academic support their children receive. However, a number of parents did raise concern via the Ofsted online survey that communication between school and home could be better. Safeguarding is effective.
p.1
Short inspection of Leighton Middle School
You and the governors have ensured that the school has effective procedures which keep pupils safe and well looked after. Records are kept accurately and staff are diligent in referring their concerns to leaders. Every child is well known and nothing is taken as insignificant. Staff are mindful of pupils’ physical and mental well-being. It is impressive that 25 members of staff are voluntarily studying a course in pupil mental health.
p.2
Short inspection of Leighton Middle School
Pupils said that they feel safe. They know how to keep themselves safe online and how to minimise risks in social situations. Pupils said that bullying is not common in school and staff deal with it quickly when it does arise.
p.2
Short inspection of Leighton Middle School
The school uses personal, social, health and economic education to teach pupils about their roles as citizens and how they should keep each other safe. Pupils told us that they are taught about diversity and British values and how this is important for their lives outside of school.
p.2
Inspection findings
To ascertain whether the school remains good, my first line of enquiry focused on how staff ensure that pupils who have a disadvantaged background perform as well as they can. In 2017, disadvantaged pupils performed better in key stage 2 national tests than in the previous year. Leaders have worked hard to ensure that pupil progress is tracked carefully and support is given quickly. Programmes such as ‘mind the gap’ ensure that pupils who have not performed as well as they could are given extra support in smaller classes before moving fully into core subjects at key stage 3. We found that leaders need to better evaluate the impact of whole-school support strategies, so they can be sure what is effective and what makes a difference to pupils’ performance. There is a wide range of strategies addressing the needs of disadvantaged pupils. The ‘little and often’ method used during tutor time for mathematics and English helps
p.2
Inspection findings
pupils to build their skills and confidence. However, the progress of disadvantaged pupils in mathematics still needs to improve, as too many of them are not reaching the higher standards in national tests. My second line of enquiry centred on how well leaders ensure that the curriculum and teaching in key stage 3 enable pupils to make as much progress as possible. The curriculum is well taught, and your data for pupil progress in each subject supports this. The curriculum is taught by specialists and there is a culture of high aspirations for pupil achievement. Leaders have invested in specialist rooms and resources to ensure that there is a positive difference between pupils’ key stage 2 primary and key stage 3 secondary experiences. We saw lessons that were challenging and taught imaginatively. For example, Year 8 pupils were studying civil rights in America, but they approached the work by asking,
p.2
Inspection findings
‘What if a particular event had not occurred?’ The level of pupil engagement and discussion in lessons was notable, and pupils said that they enjoy learning in this way. We found that pupils benefit from the high level of teacher expertise in different subject areas. Pupils make very positive progress in key stage 3, and those who underperformed in key stage 2 national tests catch up with their peers. You ensure that the curriculum at key stage 3 is aligned to that taught in the upper schools that pupils will join, and the skills for future GCSEs are taught explicitly. My final line of enquiry focused on how effectively leaders manage transition so pupils can build quickly on their learning from earlier years. There is a strong pastoral programme to ensure that pupils settle into school and become part of the Leighton family. Pupils and parents commented on how happy they are with the transition
p.2
Inspection findings
arrangements. You and your leaders are adept at securing accurate data from pupils’ previous schools and making sure that you know pupils’ strengths and weaknesses quickly. Staff then give appropriate support. This strategy is beginning to have a positive impact, for example in the remarkable progress that boys make in reading. Although pupils make strong progress over the whole of their middle school education, the performance in the national tests at key stage 2 is not as good as it could be for some groups, including girls’ mathematics.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
progress for all pupils in mathematics continues to improve leaders evaluate the impact of the whole-school support strategies, so they are clear how effective their actions are.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Central Bedfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, we held meetings with you and members of your senior leadership team, middle leaders, the chair of governors and members of the governing body. We met with groups of pupils from key stages 2 and 3. We visited lessons with you and members of your senior leadership team. They considered 137 responses from parents to the Ofsted online survey, and 304 responses from pupils and 43 responses from staff to their surveys. We reviewed a range of documentation including the school’s self- evaluation summary, improvement plans and information about pupils’ outcomes, progress and attendance. We reviewed safeguarding documentation and procedures, scrutinised the school’s record of checks on the suitability of staff to work at the school, and carried out checks to confirm that the website meets publication requirements.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion