Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Cranham Church of England Primary School

Inspected 25 May 2018 · published 5 Jul 2018 · URN 115682

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    25 May 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tom Morrison

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    GL4 8HS

  • Name on report verified

    Cranham Church of England Primary School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyvery wellhigh qualitystrong relationshipsstrongmake good progressgood progressproud
Criticismnot effectiveseriouslyconcernnot consistentlynot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings332w+81
  • Safeguarding611w+42
  • What needs to improve69w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,005
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 29%Safeguarding 54%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Anne Nolan Headteacher Cranham Church of England Primary School Cranham Gloucester Gloucestershire GL4 8HS

p.1

Short inspection of Cranham Church of England Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 25 May 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in March 2015.

p.1

This school continues to be good

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Parents, governors, pupils and staff are rightly proud of the school and value the inclusive and welcoming culture that you have created. Together with your staff you have successfully addressed the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection.

p.1

This school continues to be good

In the past two years, you have appointed two new teachers and you have recently changed the leadership responsibilities of some staff. You have ensured that teachers are well trained for their new roles and they have welcomed this. As a result you have a happy, well-motivated staff body, who give their best for the school and get the best out of the pupils.

p.1

This school continues to be good

Parents and carers comment that good use is made of the local area to enhance learning and pupils appreciate the fact that ‘we are an outside school’. You, and your governors, have spent the additional government funding for physical education wisely so that there is a wide range of sporting activities available to the pupils. This is valued by the pupils and their parents, as are the other additional activities that you ensure that the school provides. Pupils are well behaved, polite, friendly and keen to do well.

p.1

This school continues to be good

Governors have recently reorganised the way that they work so that they check how the well school is performing more effectively. They have assessed their skills and have recruited additional members who can add value to the governing body. As a result, the governing body is working more effectively.

p.1

Safeguarding is effective

Leaders and governors take the welfare and safety of pupils very seriously. Together you have ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose, and records are detailed and of high quality. The arrangements for checking the suitability of staff to work with children meet requirements.

p.2

Safeguarding is effective

Staff have built strong relationships with pupils and their families, and they take great care to ensure that pupils are kept safe in and out of school. Staff and governors have regular training on aspects of safeguarding and as a result have up- to-date knowledge of any issues or signs of abuse. Pupils learn about online safety, how to be safe outside and on the roads, and are taught about first aid. They understand what bullying is, but do not think it is a concern at this school.

p.2

Safeguarding is effective

As a result of the work of governors and staff, pupils feel safe in school, and responses on Parent View show that parents agree.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The first line of enquiry was to examine how effectively leaders were improving teaching and learning in mathematics. You rightly identified mathematics as a key priority for improvement. As part of a set of changes to staff leadership roles you decided to take personal responsibility for the leadership of mathematics. You have worked with consultants to check the quality of teaching and have prioritised staff training, using a range of respected experts as well as leading sessions yourself. As a result of this, staff confidence and subject knowledge is strong.  From the learning walk and the work in pupils’ mathematics folders we could see that teachers were planning regular mental arithmetic sessions to build pupils’ fluency in calculation. There were also some examples of activities that promote pupils’ problem-solving and reasoning skills. These are key requirements of the national curriculum in mathematics, but were not being used consistently in all

p.2

Inspection findings

classes, and in other cases were not used effectively to develop pupils’ reasoning. You were aware of this and had already planned further work to help develop pupils’ skills in this area during the next year.  The second line of enquiry was how effectively teachers are ensuring that pupils make good progress in reading. In your evaluation of the school you identified that pupils were taught the mechanics of reading very well, but were not developing other reading skills such as inference and comprehension sufficiently.  To address this you have worked with your English leader to restructure the way that reading is taught, and have provided recent training for staff to help them develop their skills in this area. This is starting to be effective. Staff are using the new approach confidently and pupils are clear about how this helps them to understand written texts more deeply. Teachers are working hard to develop

p.2

Inspection findings

pupils’ vocabulary so that this is not a barrier to their understanding.  The final line of enquiry was how effectively leaders and governors use additional government funding to support pupils to achieve the best possible outcomes. The report on how the school has spent the physical education and sport premium convincingly shows how this money has been used to improve participation and engagement so that pupils are fitter and healthier.  You, and the new leader responsible for pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities, have carefully managed the additional funding provided to support these pupils. Programmes to help these children have been evaluated carefully, and adjusted if they are not effective. Governors have checked the impact of the work that has been done to support these pupils. As a result of these actions these pupils are making good progress in their learning

p.2

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 the mathematics curriculum is further developed so that all pupils consistently develop their reasoning and problem-solving skills.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Gloucester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Gloucestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During the inspection I held meetings with you, the chair of the governing body and several other governors, middle leaders, teachers and other staff. I had a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority and met with a group of pupils. I made observations of learning across the school jointly with you, and jointly scrutinised examples of pupils’ work. I examined a variety of documents including leaders’ evaluation of the performance of the school, development plans, assessment information and the school’s website. I also examined records of checks that leaders make on the suitability of staff to work with children. I took account of the views of parents from the 35 responses to the Ofsted online survey, Parent View, and met some parents after school.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion