Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder in Richmond upon Thames

Inspected 5 Jun 2018 · published 30 Jun 2018 · URN EY423492

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Jennifer Devine

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Jun 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Jennifer Devine

  • Early years verified

    Met

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Met

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    EY423492

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsMet
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−37Criticalmore positive than 59% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehappyeffectivelyenjoymake good progressgood progressconfidenteagersettled
Criticismweaknessesineffectivefailslacksinadequatebreachesweakat risk

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings462w−7
  • Leadership187w−74
  • What needs to improve132w−60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
768
about usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 7
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 38%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 5 June 2018 14 September 2017

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder lacks awareness of her responsibility to meet the early years foundation stage requirements. A number of identified weaknesses in her practice have not been addressed since the last Ofsted visit.  The childminder has not ensured that all adults living in the home has a Disclosure and Barring Service check completed. In addition, other checks to ensure adults are suitable have not been completed.  The childminder lacks knowledge of the procedures to follow if an allegation was made against her or other adults in the home. This does not protect children’s welfare.  The childminder does not obtain and record the personal details of all the children she cares for. For example she does not have emergency contact details, or information about children’s health or dietary needs.  The childminder’s self-evaluation processes are ineffective to support her to make necessary improvements.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder has a good understanding of how children learn and develop. Her teaching is good, overall, and she uses a wide range of activities that supports children to make good progress.  Children are happy and settled, and have formed good attachments with the childminder and each other.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that every person living or working in the home from which childminding is taking place obtains an enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service check 22/06/2018

p.2

Due Date

 ensure records are kept of all children which include their full name, date of birth, the name and address of every parent, and emergency contact details 22/06/2018

p.2

Due Date

 obtain information about any special dietary requirements, preferences and food allergies a child may have, and any special health requirements before a child is admitted to the setting 22/06/2018

p.2

Due Date

 improve knowledge of safeguarding, in particular regards to understanding what to do if an allegation is made against a person living in the household. 22/06/2018

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector spent the majority of time observing children in the dining room and kitchen.  The inspector sampled documentation including children’s records and suitability checks.  The inspector held discussions with the childminder.  The inspector completed a joint observation with the childminder.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

The childminder is not able to address weaknesses and sustain improvements in her practice. Some of the weaknesses identified at this inspection, including breaches of statutory requirements, have already been raised with the childminder by Ofsted previously. Safeguarding is ineffective. The childminder has not ensured that all adults living in the home complete a Disclosure and Barring Service check. In addition, the childminder has not completed all the required forms to enable Ofsted to carry out further suitability checks, such as social services checks. Although the childminder reports that children are not left unsupervised with these adults, these omissions still place children’s safety and welfare at potential risk. The childminder fails to obtain all children’s personal details when they start in her care. For example, she does not have emergency contact details for all children. The childminder’s safeguarding knowledge is weak. Although she

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

knows what to do if she has concerns about a child’s welfare, she does not know the procedures to follow if an allegation was to be made against her or other adults in the home. This does not protect children’s overall welfare and safety.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good

The childminder observes children in their play and effectively recognises their interests and achievements. She joins in with children’s play and interacts with them effectively. In particular, the childminder supports children’s mathematical learning well. She incorporates mathematical concepts into all activities. For example, she comments and encourages children to notice shapes, colour and size as they play. The childminder follows the children’s interests and supports them to understand how to care for others. For example, they enjoy playing with the baby dolls and show kindness as they cuddle their dolls to sleep. The childminder talks to parents on a daily basis. This helps to keep them updated about their children’s day and the progress they are making.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The weaknesses in leadership and management compromise children’s welfare. The childminder fails to obtain information on children’s medical needs or their dietary requirements when they first start. This puts children’s overall welfare at risk. Despite this, children are happy in the childminder’s care. Children enjoy regular fresh air and exercise. They visit local playgroups on a regular basis which supports their social skills and confidence to grow. They behave well and are learning to share and take turns with their friends.

p.3

Outcomes for children are good

Children are making good progress in their development. This supports them to be prepared for their next stage in learning. Children are mastering their independence and self-help skills. For example, they know to go to the bathroom to wash their hands before eating. Children are confident and eager to engage in activities, and are able to communicate their interests well.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY423492 Local authority Richmond upon Thames Inspection number 1137268 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 6

p.4

Name of registered person

Date of previous inspection 14 September 2017

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 2011. She lives in Twickenham, in the London Borough of Richmond-upon- Thames. The childminder works Monday to Friday, from 8am to 6pm all year round, except for bank holidays or family holidays.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion