Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Surrey
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Jun 2018
- Inspectors verified
Amanda Tyson
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY435941
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children do not make good progress from their starting points and are not best prepared for starting school. p.1
- Although the childminder completes observations and assessments on children, these do not always identify the most pertinent gaps in progress. p.1
- The childminder’s quality of teaching and her planning for children’s progress are not consistently good. p.1
- Activities are not always pitched at a level appropriate for each child. p.1
- Planning is not focused sharply enough on mathematics and literacy for older children. p.1
- The childminder does not make good use of self-evaluation to identify and target her professional development needs. p.1
- She has not addressed the weakness raised at the last inspection for developing knowledge and skills to support children learning English as an additional language. p.1
- These children are not making rapid enough progress. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 854
- about usual (typical 743)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 6 June 2018 10 November 2015
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
Children do not make good progress from their starting points and are not best prepared for starting school. Although the childminder completes observations and assessments on children, these do not always identify the most pertinent gaps in progress. Neither are they always accurate. The childminder’s quality of teaching and her planning for children’s progress are not consistently good. Activities are not always pitched at a level appropriate for each child. Planning is not focused sharply enough on mathematics and literacy for older children. The childminder does not make good use of self-evaluation to identify and target her professional development needs. She has not addressed the weakness raised at the last inspection for developing knowledge and skills to support children learning English as an additional language. These children are not making rapid enough progress. The childminder shares no information about children’s progress and development with
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
the nursery settings children attend. Not all parents are sufficiently informed about children’s progress or involved in planning for children’s next steps in learning.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children benefit from having good access to fresh air and physical exercise each day. They also enjoy taking part in local community group activities where they learn to socialise and be part of a bigger group of children. The childminder has suitable strategies and procedures in place to keep children safe in the home and on outings. She gives good attention to fire safety.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
evaluate observations more thoroughly and use this information to ensure that assessments are accurate, clearly identify any gaps in progress and support children needs, involving parents and other settings children attend, to help children make good progress 25/06/2018
p.2
Due Date
improve the quality of teaching to provide children with more developmentally appropriate activities and opportunities to make good progress and achieve their potential, paying particular regard to supporting speech and language 25/06/2018
p.2
Due Date
develop good teaching skills for supporting children's communication and language, and especially those learning English as an additional language. 25/06/2018
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
plan more specifically for older children's progress in mathematics and literacy make better use of self-evaluation to improve the quality of teaching and learning.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed children engaged in play and learning indoors. The inspector looked at the childminder's range of play and learning resources and equipment, and observed the suitability of the premises. The inspector sampled a range of documentation, including children's records and evidence of the childminder's suitability. The inspector discussed the childminder's self- evaluation with her. The inspector discussed the childminder's practice with her and the impact of her engagement with children. The inspector sought and took account of the views of parents.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
Safeguarding is effective. The childminder has a suitable knowledge of the possible signs of abuse and neglect, and the procedures to follow if she is concerned. However, she does not reflect on her practice or focus on professional development effectively. For example, she has not fully addressed previous recommendations raised. Nonetheless, the childminder is now looking at training options that will fit in around her working hours and family commitments. She has attended, with the children, an introduction to forest school teaching and is keen to learn more about this. The childminder receives nursery education funding for some children. However, when children's attendance is poor she does not do enough to encourage parents to make the most of the early years support their children need.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The quality of the childminder's observations and assessments is variable. She does not use the information she gains to accurately identify gaps in learning, such as those in mathematics and literacy for older children. The quality of her activity planning and teaching is variable. For example, she takes children on outings to the zoo and to visit the pet shop to support their interest in animals. Toddlers learn the names of different animals and what sounds they make. However, the childminder does not always put enough thought into the planning of activities indoors. On the day of inspection, she provided toddlers with cake cutters and rolling pins to use with play dough. However, toddlers found these too difficult to use and so lost interest. The childminder does not always step in to model correct language. For example, when toddlers call a rolling pin a 'roll roll', the childminder replies using the same term. She asks children questions, but this is often in a
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
testing way rather than playfully when they are engaged in pretend play.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
The childminder does not effectively share information with all parents and other settings about children's well-being to support continuity. Nonetheless, most children are keen to attend and establish strong emotional attachments with the childminder. The childminder attempts to address children's worries. For example, she uses a safety gate to separate her dog from anxious children. The childminder is patient and speaks kindly to children. She successfully teaches them to share and take turns, and they behave well for their age. The childminder makes good use of the local and wider area to promote diversity.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children who are learning English as an additional language are not being well prepared for school. They do not attend regularly enough to make the necessary progress in their spoken English. Toddlers develop their hand skills. They manipulate dough and use pencils and crayons to make marks. Children develop independence, for example, they use forks and spoons to eat lunch. They use language to express themselves, although the childminder does not help them enough with pronouncing accurate speech sounds.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY435941 Local authority Surrey Inspection number 1131623 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 8 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 5
p.4
Name of registered person
Date of previous inspection 10 November 2015
p.4
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 2011 and lives in Leatherhead, Surrey. She operates Monday to Friday, throughout the year, between 7am and 6.30pm.
p.4
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion