Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Let Me Play Limited

Inspected 23 May 2018 · URN 1276422

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jane Hughes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    23 May 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jane Hughes

  • Name on report verified

    Let Me Play Limited

  • URN verified

    1276422

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 17% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependent
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
22
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
7 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%About the inspection 99%

Full report text

Let Me Play Limited Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Jane Hughes, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address:

4 Berghem Mews Blythe Road London W14 OHN Monitoring visit: Let me play Ltd, 22-23 May 2018

p.1

Context and focus of visit

This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of a series of monitoring visits to a sample of new apprenticeship providers that are funded through the apprenticeship levy. The focus of these visits is on the three themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Established in 2004, Let Me Play Ltd is a sports, education and outreach organisation based in Hammersmith, West London. LMP education is the training arm and has been teaching apprenticeship training through subcontract arrangements since 2015. LMP education became a prime-contract holder in May 2017 and delivers apprenticeships to schools and academy trusts paying the apprenticeship levy, and through its apprenticeship training agency, Sporting Education Ltd.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

There are currently 119 apprentices on programme. The majority of these are on a level 3 supporting teaching and learning framework. Smaller numbers are on standards in business administration level 3, sports coaching level 3, journalism level 3, facilities management levels 2 and 3, team leading and management levels 4 and 5. Since gaining their direct contract, LMP education has gained a national schools academy trust contract and now teaches its programme across the country.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Directors and managers at LMP education share a vision to inspire ambition in, and widen horizons for, young people and adults through sports and education. They work very closely with schools and academy trusts to design and teach apprenticeship programmes that support young people into working in education and upskill current school employees. Pre-apprenticeship programmes successfully prepare young people for the transition onto an apprenticeship and, as a result, very few apprentices leave their programme early. Directors ensure that there are clear pathways and progression opportunities available for apprentices working within schools. Since gaining a directly funded contract, managers at LMP education have restructured the management team and increased the number of subject tutors in business administration, sports and teaching and learning to support apprentices. In the early stages of the programme, directors recognised that the staffing structure in

p.2

Reasonable progress

place was not effective in ensuring that apprentices made good progress. Tutors’ caseloads were too high and apprentices suffered from too many cancelled appointments. As a result, a minority of the apprentices enrolled at the beginning of the contract are behind where they should be with the completion of their Monitoring visit: Let me play Ltd, 22-23 May 2018 assessments. However, the newly recruited tutors, who now have lower case-loads, work hard to ensure that apprentices achieve their programme on time. Directors have invested appropriately in new management information systems and an online portfolio. However, not all tutors use the online portfolio consistently well. The new structure ensures there are clear lines of reporting and accountability. Directors meet regularly to monitor the performance of their managers and tutors and to check that they comply with all the requirements of the apprenticeship

p.2

Reasonable progress

programme. Directors rightly acknowledge that as the provision grows, they need to strengthen their governance and are reviewing the arrangements they have in place. The focus on the entitlement to off-the-job training is clear. Apprentices take part in a variety of learning activities, such as regular workshops, online group sessions and one-to-one coaching. Schools receive comprehensive information about their responsibilities when they recruit apprentices and tutors work closely with apprentices’ managers to link the off-the-job activities to apprentices’ work. For example, apprentices on supporting teaching and learning programmes take part in school trips and then use these experiences to meet the appropriate criteria in their qualification. Directors do not have clear oversight of the delivery of mathematics and English functional skills qualifications, or the development of these skills for apprentices who

p.3

Reasonable progress

have already achieved the qualifications. Managers ensure that the majority of tutors receive good support to improve their own English and mathematics skills and to support apprentices to achieve their qualifications in these subjects. The variety of online resources for tutors and apprentices to access is good. Apprentices speak about how they have improved their written communication skills. In a few progress reviews, apprentices show how they have used appropriate mathematics while at work. However, there is not a clear plan to bring these activities together and evaluate the impact on apprentices’ development.

p.3

Reasonable progress

The majority of apprentices are highly motivated, enjoy their apprenticeship and develop new skills, knowledge and behaviours relevant to their job roles. For example, following a visit to a magistrates’ court, apprentices on the journalism standards course create press releases and understand what they can and cannot report on in legal cases. Business administration apprentices deal well with angry parents at school, take minutes of meetings, and improve their information technology skills. Apprentices on supporting teaching and learning programmes develop very effectively their understanding around child protection. Apprentices have regular contact with their tutors through effective progress reviews and assessments. Tutors plan and arrange extra support and one-to-one sessions when apprentices fall behind or miss sessions. As a result, the majority of apprentices make their expected progress. Monitoring visit: Let me play Ltd, 22-23 May 2018

p.3

Reasonable progress

Tutors are well qualified and experienced in the specialist subject areas they teach. The majority use the assessment of apprentices’ prior skills, knowledge and job roles appropriately to ensure that apprentices complete learning and work that is new and relevant, and that supports them to prepare for their next steps. In a minority of cases, where employed apprentices have worked in their role for some time, staff do not take account of apprenitces’ prior experience sufficiently to ensure that apprentices are on the correct programme. The quality of information that apprentices receive about their work, in their progress reviews and in the targets set is not consistently high across all subject areas and tutors. Apprentices on supporting teaching and learning programmes often receive helpful advice on how to improve their work and useful actions on how to do this. However, this is not the same for the small minority of apprentices on the business

p.4

Reasonable progress

administration and supporting the delivery of physical education programmes. In the small proportion of teaching sessions observed on the monitoring visit, tutors linked well the classroom activity to work practices. In journalism, apprentices are given the opportunity to practise their ‘live and on the whistle’ reporting techniques by attending events such as the Football Association Disability Cup. In business administration, apprentices develop mentoring skills to support and oversee new apprentices joining their organisation. In a minority of sessions, where tutors questioning to check and deepen apprentices’ knowledge is not effective, it is not clear if apprentices understand the topic. Most apprentices, particularly those that attend the pre-apprenticeship course, receive effective careers advice and information at the start of their programme. They have a good understanding of the routes they can take and the opportunities

p.4

Reasonable progress

open to them once they complete their apprenticeship. A very small number of previously employed apprentices at schools have not received the same level of information and are unclear about the benefits of completing an apprenticeship or the options open to them. Directors have implemented appropriate quality monitoring processes and have appointed a new quality team. Lead tutors and quality assurers work closely to ensure they comply with the requirements of the qualifications and new standards. Regular quality reviews take place and managers support tutors to improve their teaching practice through the observations of teaching, learning and assessment they carry out. Managers, in their recent review of the observation process, rightly identified that they focus too much on what the tutor does and not enough on the skills development and knowledge of apprentices. Directors, in their evaluation of the quality of provision, correctly identify areas for

p.4

Reasonable progress

improvement, such as stronger governance, robust quality monitoring and reducing the number of apprentices who make slow progress. The resulting action plan to make these improvements does not contain clear steps on how and when these will be achieved. Monitoring visit: Let me play Ltd, 22-23 May 2018

p.4

Reasonable progress

Directors and managers ensure that safeguarding arrangements are effective. Managers and tutors establish a culture of safeguarding and apprentices understand well how to keep themselves safe. Apprentices receive appropriate safeguarding training at induction, through regular newsletters, discussions at progress reviews and compulsory online courses. Directors do not systematically check if apprentices have completed the online modules. Apprentices benefit from additional safeguarding training and information they receive at their schools. They talk confidently about how important it is that they understand the dangers of radicalisation and extremism in the context of their work. A designated safeguarding lead has received appropriate training and is responsible for monitoring and reporting any disclosures, of which there have been few. Directors have trained several other members of staff to the same level and all staff

p.5

Reasonable progress

attend regular safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ duty training. Two members of staff are qualified as mental health first aid trainers and have trained a group of apprentices in mental health first aid. These apprentices are now the youth mental health first aiders at their schools. Through the recruitment process, managers have ensured that all staff are safe to work with children and apprentices. The safeguarding policies and procedures are appropriate, with clear lines of responsibility and reporting. Managers support tutors well to integrate safeguarding, British values and the threats associated with radicalisation and extremism into their delivery of training and their discussions with apprentices at progress reviews. Tutors feel confident and able to use current and local incidents to generate discussion with apprentices. For example, in a journalism session, apprentices develop their understanding of British

p.5

Reasonable progress

values and equality through the tutor’s skilful integration of the ‘editors’ code’ which outlines the expectations to which journalists should adhere. Since the provision has extended nationally, directors have not carried out a risk assessment, nor implemented a ‘Prevent’ duty action plan, in all the geographical areas where apprentices work. Monitoring visit: Let me play Ltd, 22-23 May 2018 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.6

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion