Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Keys Direct Care Limited in North Northamptonshire

Inspected 6 Jun 2018 · published 21 Jun 2018 · URN SC033817

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Direct Care Ltd

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Jun 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bev Allison

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    SC033817

  • URN verified

    SC033817

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectivegood progresssafewell plannedengagingwell supportedpositively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings725w+90
  • What needs to improve128w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
829
shorter than usual (typical 1319)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 51
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection report children’s home: SC033817 1 SC033817 Registered provider: Direct Care Ltd

p.1

Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This home is operated by a private company. It is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to four children who have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. There is an acting manager in post who is yet to be registered.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

good

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report children’s home: SC033817 2

p.1

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

25/04/2017 Full Good 12/01/2017 Interim Improved effectiveness 17/05/2016 Full Requires improvement 15/12/2015 Interim Declined in effectiveness Inspection report children’s home: SC033817 3

p.2

Recommendations

 Where children placed in a home are not participating in education because they have been excluded or are not on a school roll for some other reason, the registered person and staff must work closely with the placing authority so that the child is supported and enabled to resume full-time education as soon as possible. In the interim, the child should be supported to sustain or regain their confidence in education and be engaged in suitable structured activities. If no education place is identified by the placing authority, the registered person must challenge them to meet the child’s needs under regulation 5 (engaging with the wider system to ensure children’s needs are met). (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 28, paragraph 5.15)

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Young people are supported to make progress in all areas of their development, but are particularly well supported in reducing their risk-taking behaviours. A social worker said: ‘The staff have done a remarkable job as the young person was in complete opposition to being in care.’ The acting manager has responded positively to the requirements made at the interim inspection and has addressed the shortfalls in relation to impact risk assessments. These assessments are now detailed, thorough and cover areas of potential risk and the actions required. Consultation with children is positive and is evidenced in a number of ways. Staff know the children well and understand key plans in relation to behaviour management and risk. Key-work sessions are comprehensive and cover a number of subjects. Staff provide a nurturing and empathetic environment that is supported by trusted relationships. This, combined with a comprehensive understanding of children’s

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

individual needs, contributes to good outcomes for children. Staff model positive relationships to children. Children and families are supported to maintain positive and meaningful contact. Key workers and managers track children’s progress on a weekly and monthly basis. Communication with key agencies is effective. Educationally, some children have made good progress from their starting points. One child is currently completing their GCSEs. Another child needs more support with their education. Staff have been creative in helping this child, and have tried to escalate the problems in education, but there could be more challenge of partner agencies when progress is not being made. A recommendation is made in respect of this. Inspection report children’s home: SC033817 4

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The management team ensures that robust safeguarding processes are in place and are well understood by the staff team. The new acting manager has worked hard to refocus the staff team and place safeguarding at the centre of childcare practice in the home. This has addressed the previous shortfalls found at the interim inspection. Staff ensure that children are safe. Thorough planning of risk assessments, key-work sessions and work with other agencies contributes to reduced risk-taking behaviours. Children who have previously experienced high levels of missing from care and risks relating to child sexual exploitation have been supported to reduce these risks. There have been no incidents of children going missing from the home in recent months. This is a significant improvement and reflects the commitment of the staff team. Children are kept safe from the risks associated with social media. Children’s plans and

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

risks are assessed on an individual basis and ongoing work is identified to keep children safe. Multi-agency working has improved since the interim inspection. Closer working relationships are evidenced between staff, social workers and education providers. A social worker said: ‘The staff have been really accommodating and communication is good.’

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The acting manager is approachable and makes herself available to staff and to children. The manager has made sure that the shortfalls identified at the last inspection have been addressed in a short period of time. A child said: ‘I trust the manager with everything. She is trying to do a good job.’ Staff are provided with opportunities to reflect on their practice and to debrief. Staff report that they feel supported by managers and highlight that safeguarding is now clearly in focus. The manager and the deputy manager evidence that there are positive and constructive working relationships. Staff have focused on whistleblowing procedures. This is now an ongoing agenda item for staff in their one-to-one supervision and in staff meetings. Staff training is thorough, well coordinated and well planned. Staff supervision and team meetings have been given more priority. This includes increased frequency of team meetings to enable staff to focus on key areas of

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

development. The organisation has supported the home well through this period of improvement.

p.4

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives Inspection report children’s home: SC033817 5 of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.4

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: SC033817 6

p.5

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: Goldwyns, Rutland House, 90 92 Baxter Avenue, Southend On Sea SS2 6HZ

p.6

Children’s home details

Responsible individual: Rebecca Ouellani

p.6

Inspector

Bev Allison, social care regulatory inspector Inspection report children’s home: SC033817 7 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion