Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Oakwood School

Inspected 16 May 2018 · URN 125273

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    16 May 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paula Sargent

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    RH6 9AE

  • Name on report verified

    Oakwood School

Page 4 of 5
Page 4 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+82Very positivemore positive than 84% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronghigh expectationseffectivevery effectiveclearstrengthconsistentlyeffectively
Criticismat riskconcernsfalling behindexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1413w+81
  • What needs to improve89w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,493
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Simon Potten Headteacher Oakwood School Balcombe Road Horley Surrey RH6 9AE

p.1

Short inspection of Oakwood School

Following my visit to the school on 16 May 2018 with Emma Phillips, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in November 2013. The school also received a no formal designation monitoring inspection in September 2015, with a focus on the behaviour and welfare of pupils.

p.1

Short inspection of Oakwood School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Oakwood School

Since your appointment in September 2015, you have been resolute in your determination to improve the life chances of your pupils by raising standards of teaching, learning and behaviour. Pupils, staff and parents and carers speak highly of the difference you have made and endorse the vision you have for the school. Supported by a dedicated team of senior and middle leaders, you have raised expectations across the school. Staff and pupils have responded very positively. As a result, the large majority of pupils are making good progress across all subjects and year groups.

p.1

Short inspection of Oakwood School

You have worked hard to win the trust of parents and members of the local community, some of whom previously had a negative view of the school. Owing to strong leadership at all levels and your uncompromising insistence on high standards, parents have gained confidence in the school, and pupil admission numbers are rising quickly as a consequence. As one parent said, ‘Everything has gone from strength to strength. There is a well-balanced feeling around the school. Pupils are encouraged to do their very best.’

p.1

Short inspection of Oakwood School

Since the last inspection, you have ensured that teachers have developed their skills through a well-thought-out programme of professional training. Staff appreciate the opportunities they have to work together and learn from each other. For example, GCSE results in history and geography examinations have been in the top 20% of schools nationally for the last two years, and you have sensibly used teachers’ expertise in these subjects to help others to aim as high. You support and challenge those staff who require further development, and hold all teachers to account through rigorous monitoring of their work. Consequently, there is a large proportion of consistently strong teaching across the school.

p.1

Short inspection of Oakwood School

There is a welcoming, calm and orderly feel to the school. Posters of the school’s ‘7Cs’ (challenge, courtesy, communication, community, consistency, clarity and collegiality) are much in evidence around the building and are frequently referred to. Pupils are polite, friendly and very articulate. They happily chat to visitors and clearly enjoy each other’s company during break- and lunchtimes. Pupils are proud of their school and are keen to learn, as shown by their rising levels of attendance. The school’s pastoral support provision is very effective, and relationships between staff and pupils are strong. For example, a parent whose child has been very unwell said, ‘The school has been amazing at supporting my child and me through this time.’

p.2

Short inspection of Oakwood School

Governors are loyal to the school and are very involved with it. They visit frequently to see what is happening for themselves. They are committed to improving the school still further and have the confidence to ask challenging questions of school leaders. They support you well in tackling the school’s areas for improvement, which you have accurately identified. The school’s self-evaluation is honest and transparent and links sensibly to the school improvement plan. However, you recognise that actions implemented sometimes need to be more frequently and sharply evaluated to make sure they are working to maximum effect.

p.2

Short inspection of Oakwood School

Leaders, including governors, have maintained a strong and effective culture of safeguarding within the school. The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and that record keeping is methodical. Referrals are made appropriately to other agencies when the need arises, to make sure that pupils get the help they need quickly.

p.2

Short inspection of Oakwood School

Staff and governors have received wide-ranging training in safeguarding matters and keep their knowledge up to date. Members of the governing body ensure that they follow up any concerns a parent raises.

p.2

Short inspection of Oakwood School

Pupils and parents who responded to the online questionnaire are clear that the school is a safe place. Pupils told inspectors that bullying is rare and that they feel confident to go to a member of staff if they have any difficulties, knowing that any issues will be dealt with effectively.

p.2

Short inspection of Oakwood School

Pupils receive plenty of information through the taught curriculum about how to deal with risks they may routinely face, such as through the use of the internet and accessing social networking sites. Inspectors saw examples in pupils’ religious education books of their being taught about the threat of radicalisation and extremism.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Over time, disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities have not made as much progress as other groups in the school. Inspectors therefore visited a number of lessons to see these pupils at work and to look at their books. Pupils are making strong progress in subjects such as humanities, modern foreign languages, mathematics, English and religious education. Teachers keep a close eye on these pupils, and the introduction of improved systems for tracking pupils’ progress is leading to more timely interventions when pupils are falling behind. Consequently, disadvantaged pupils and those who have SEN and/or disabilities are catching up with their peers, although some of them need to speed up. You recognise that more training for staff on specific strategies to help pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities would be helpful in this regard.  Leaders are effective in using pupil premium funding to organise extra support

p.3

Inspection findings

for those disadvantaged pupils who need it. For example, some pupils go to breakfast club or have help with their reading. Some pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities receive support with their English and mathematics through specialist online programmes. In-class support from teaching assistants is also benefiting pupils. School leaders can demonstrate that these interventions are helping pupils to make faster progress, but you recognise that sharper evaluation to measure their effectiveness would be beneficial.  Inspectors were keen to look at the quality of teaching and learning and to see whether the work is challenging pupils to achieve their very best, especially disadvantaged pupils and those who have SEN and/or disabilities. In all lessons seen, pupils were working hard, behaving well and enjoying their learning. Teachers have strong subject knowledge and have established very strong relationships with pupils.

p.3

Inspection findings

 Your drive to ensure teachers give valuable advice to pupils about how to improve their work is bearing fruit. Teachers are following the school’s marking policy, giving meaningful advice to deepen pupils’ understanding. Pupils are responding to this advice effectively, leading to clear progress in their knowledge, skills and understanding.  Where teaching is most effective, teachers have high expectations of pupils and ask them challenging questions to make them think hard. For example, in a Year 8 geography lesson, pupils discussed data on microclimates and were challenged by their teacher to justify their ideas. As a result, pupils made rapid gains in their learning. However, you recognise that pupils’ progress, especially that of disadvantaged pupils and those who have SEN and/or disabilities, would be faster if all staff followed the school’s procedures with equal rigour and had high expectations of what pupils can achieve.

p.3

Inspection findings

 Historically, the school’s rates of fixed-term exclusions have been high, and inspectors therefore looked closely at standards of behaviour. You have been clear about what is and is not acceptable. For example, you have not been afraid to introduce clear rules regarding the style of school shoes and the use of mobile phones. Pupils understand the rules and stick to them, leading to a harmonious, orderly and positive school ethos.  Staff, pupils and parents are clear that behaviour has greatly improved in classrooms, around the building and in the local area. Teachers say that behaviour is managed more consistently and they appreciate the support they have from school leaders to do so. The high visibility of senior leaders is valued in this regard. Staff know their pupils well and are quick to intervene where pupils are at risk of their behaviour deteriorating. As a result, the rates of fixed-term

p.3

Inspection findings

exclusions have fallen markedly, and high expectations of pupils’ behaviour are well embedded.

p.4

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 all staff have high expectations of what pupils can achieve, and rigorously follow the school’s procedures so that all pupils, especially disadvantaged pupils and those who have SEN and/or disabilities, make faster progress  they evaluate actions more sharply to make sure the plans are working.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Surrey. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

Inspectors held meetings with you, other school leaders, teachers, two members of the governing body and a group of pupils. The lead inspector also had a telephone conversation with the chair of governors and another with a representative from the local authority. We observed pupils’ learning in a series of short visits to a number of lessons, and all of these visits were conducted jointly with members of the school’s staff.

p.4

Information about the inspection

We scrutinised a range of school documentation including: the school’s self- evaluation; the school’s improvement plan; safeguarding records; and information about pupils’ achievement and behaviour. We considered the views expressed in 172 responses by parents to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and the 56 free- text comments by parents, together with 193 questionnaires returned by pupils and 93 returned by school staff.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion