Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Durants School

Inspected 15 May 2018 · published 15 Jun 2018 · URN 102066

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    15 May 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Penny Barratt

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    EN3 5BY

  • Name on report verified

    Durants School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+86Very positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelystrongextremelyfeel safehappysafewell supported
Criticismseriouslynot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings870w+85
  • What needs to improve73w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
928
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Peter de Rosa Headteacher Durants School 4 Pitfield Way Enfield EN3 5BY

p.1

Short inspection of Durants School

Following my visit to the school on 15 May 2018 with Mary Geddes, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in December 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of Durants School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. The school has undergone considerable change in recent years. It now provides for secondary pupils with autism, having previously catered for pupils aged three to 19 with complex needs. This has resulted in a period of considerable change and adjustment for staff and pupils. The curriculum and assessment systems have been redesigned and meet the needs of the pupils well.

p.1

Short inspection of Durants School

You explained the approach you have taken to develop your staff and train new teachers. This has meant changing the role of the heads of department. They now have a clear oversight of the age group they are responsible for and provide effective monitoring and support of the new teachers.

p.1

Short inspection of Durants School

Inspectors spoke to several pupils and parents. All were very proud of the school. Pupils love their school and attend regularly.

p.1

Short inspection of Durants School

The school is presently split over two sites, consisting of the main school and the additional resource base (ARP). The local authority have asked you to expand the school and a new site is being built. At present, leaders maintain quality assurance systems and procedures across the two sites. You and your governors are well aware that these quality assurance arrangements will require further refinement once the proposed expansion is completed.

p.1

Short inspection of Durants School

Safeguarding practice and procedures are effective and fit for purpose. A strong culture of safeguarding is evident in both the school and the ARP. Leaders, staff and governors ensure that all safeguarding checks are completed and that staff receive effective safeguarding training to ensure that they remain up to date with the latest guidance. Across the school staff maintain a calm atmosphere which helps pupils to feel safe at school and in the ARP. Parents who we spoke to and who completed Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, said that they are happy with the school and believe that their child is safe.

p.1

Short inspection of Durants School

Leaders are aware that the pupils attending the school are particularly vulnerable. Regular meetings with staff in school and outside professionals make sure that key information is shared. Online safety is taken extremely seriously. Some pupils were able to explain in detail to inspectors what steps they take to keep themselves safe while using the internet.

p.2

Inspection findings

 We first agreed to look at the impact that leaders’ actions are having on improving staff’s management of pupils’ behaviour. This is because it is a key focus identified by the school.  There is a calm consistent approach to managing behaviour throughout the school. Thorough systems and procedures are in place to record behavioural incidents. The school occasionally uses quiet rooms and has taken external advice on this.  Most of the time behaviour management practice gives pupils the necessary skills to manage their own behaviour and not to rely on adults. Pupils are well supported in developing social skills, for example, waiting, turn-taking and choosing.  The management of pupils’ behaviour is generally effective, including the more challenging students in the sixth form. Behaviour information is analysed regularly, but it takes time to collate all the information.  The use of reward systems is not consistent across the whole school. Some staff

p.2

Inspection findings

use consequences while others focus mostly on rewards.  We next looked at how the curriculum is helping pupils to achieve well. This is an area the school identified for development, following the change of pupil intake and age range.  The curriculum is well organised to meet the different needs of pupils at each key stage. It is designed to prepare pupils for the next stage of their education. As such, life skills are an important component of the curriculum. The pupils are provided with opportunities to gain a wide range of relevant certificates, which provides a basis for their future education  Evidence from visits to classrooms shows that sometimes pupils are overdependent on adults to support their learning. When this occurs, this reduces pupils’ opportunities to become a successful learner and develop their independence skills.  Finally, we looked at how effectively leaders and staff are able to demonstrate

p.2

Inspection findings

the progress pupils make while at the school. This included looking at pupils’ awareness of what they need to do to progress. This was an area for improvement identified at the last inspection.  The school recently designed an assessment system which is closely linked to the curriculum. Leaders have put a range of processes in place, involving a number of staff, to effectively keep track of pupils’ progress.  The school have started to set goals for social and emotional development emerging from education, health and care plans, as well as subject-based targets. As a result, assessment overall provides a holistic view of pupil development. Additionally, a new feedback system is used consistently throughout the school which supports pupils’ understanding of what they need to do to progress.

p.2

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 procedures are further developed to support the analysis of behavioural incidents, so that timely action can be implemented  all staff provide more opportunities to promote and develop pupils’ independence

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Enfield. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

The inspectors carried out the following activities during the inspection:

p.3

Information about the inspection

 meetings with the headteacher, senior and middle leaders, governors and representatives from the local authority  joint visits to classrooms with the headteacher and deputy headteacher  scrutiny of pupils’ work and discussions with pupils  informal discussions with parents at the end of the school day  responses to Ofsted questionnaires  a scrutiny of documents, including the school’s development plan, safeguarding information and records, and data on pupils’ achievement and attendance  a review of the school’s website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion