Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Oakridge School

Inspected 3 May 2018 · published 14 Jun 2018 · URN 110289

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

David Harris (lead), Barbara Carr, Peter Dunmall

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 May 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Barbara Carr, David Harris, Peter Dunmall

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    HP11 2PN

  • Name on report verified

    Oakridge School

  • URN verified

    110289

Page 8 of 11
Page 8 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progresseffectivelystrongeffectiveimprovedpositivewell plannedimproving
Criticismrequires improvementnot consistentlynot rapid progressbelowconcernsweaknot effectivelynot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings708w+19
  • Leadership191w+13
  • Safeguarding90w+16
  • What needs to improve1827w+55

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,742
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 20%Leadership 5%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 53%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Oakridge School Oakridge Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire HP11 2PN

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The school has not maintained the good quality of education since the previous inspection. This is mainly due to significant and frequent changes of staffing at all levels.  Teaching over time has not been good enough. Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can do and achieve are too low and vary too widely. Often, the challenge for the most able pupils is not high enough.  Subject leaders do not check on the quality of teaching and learning effectively in their subjects. As a result, teaching and learning are not typically good or better.  While the attendance of pupils is beginning to improve, it is still below the national average.  Pupils in Years 3 to 6 do not make enough progress from their starting points. Their achievement is below that of other children nationally.  Pupils do not have opportunities to apply their mathematical knowledge in reasoning and solving problems. This impacts on the rate of

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

progress they make within the subject.  Disadvantaged pupils were not supported effectively last year. Consequently, they did not make rapid progress. However, support for current disadvantaged pupils is improving their achievement.  Governors do not hold leaders sharply to account for the progress particular groups of pupils make, including those eligible for free school meals. As a result, governors do not ensure that all pupils achieve well. The school has the following strengths

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Children make good progress in the early years as activities are well planned. The teaching of phonics (letters and the sounds they represent) is good. Pupils in Year 1 have good reading skills.  Pupils’ personal development, behaviour and welfare are good. Pupils behave well in lessons and around the school.  Staff say they are proud to be part of the school community and show great commitment to tackling the issues identified by the new headteacher.  Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is a strong feature of the school. Pupils value and respect everyone equally, regardless of race, ethnicity or belief.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching, learning and assessment so that they are consistently good, by: – ensure that teaching challenges all pupils’ learning, but especially the most able, so that pupils achieve as well as they can – ensuring that mathematics teaching develops pupils’ use of calculation skills to help them solve problems and develop reasoning skills – rigorously checking that the support given to disadvantaged pupils is effective in helping them make strong progress in all years.  Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management, including governance, by: – improving the school’s assessment systems by incorporating different groups of pupils in a wide range of subjects in order to identify any pupils who do not make consistently good progress – ensuring that subject leaders are more effective in their monitoring roles – governors holding leaders to account more rigorously for the impact of school

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

improvement initiatives and planning over time – ensuring that governors have the appropriate training to carry out their roles and statutory duties.  Work more closely with the families of those pupils with high rates of absence to improve their attendance levels. An external review of the school’s use of pupil premium should be undertaken to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. An external review of governance should be undertaken to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leadership and management requires improvement because leaders have not secured sufficient improvement to ensure that pupils’ outcomes are good. In part, this is due to the changes in staff that have taken time to complete and the challenges leaders have faced in recruiting high-quality staff.  Leaders and managers have not ensured that teaching has remained consistently good across the school. Consequently, not all pupils make good progress in reading, writing and mathematics.  The school’s system for checking pupils’ outcomes does not provide leaders with clear information to enable them to check the attainment of key groups of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils. As a result, leaders are unable to effectively evaluate whether pupils make sufficient progress towards working at standards expected for their age.  Joint observations with the headteacher show that her judgements are accurate and

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

feedback to teachers focuses on ways in which they can improve their teaching practice. The headteacher has accurately identified areas requiring further development, such as the assessment system and challenge for the most able pupils.  There have been a number of changes in leadership roles. Recently appointed subject leaders and other middle leaders have considerable expertise in, and enthusiasm for, the areas for which they are responsible. They are not all effective enough in identifying ways that teaching can be improved to the very best levels.  Over the past few years, pupil premium funding has not been used effectively to consistently ensure that disadvantaged pupils make good progress. Improvements to teaching this year mean that more pupils are making better progress than previously. However, improving the progress of this group remains a high priority.  The curriculum is well planned, broad and balanced. Leaders have ensured that it is

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

closely related to pupils’ interests and, as a result, pupils are generally engaged in their learning. It is supported well by a range of visits and other activities. For example, Year 2 pupils spoke enthusiastically about their ‘forest school’ (where activities are often taught in the outdoor environment) with great enthusiasm.  The school is strongly committed to providing equality of opportunity, fostering good relationships and discouraging any discrimination. All pupils, whatever their ability or background, have the opportunity to take part in the school’s activities.  The school promotes pupils’ understanding of fundamental British values effectively. Leaders foster the principles of democracy, for example, by holding elections to select members of the school council. The school’s key values such as respect and perseverance encourage pupils to understand and display these qualities in and around

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

the school. Leaders make sure all pupils are valued, and mutual respect and tolerance are strong features of the school.  The school uses the primary education and sports funding effectively. Leaders employ this funding to support staff training and provide specialist coaching. Pupils enjoy sport and say that the school encourages them to look after their physical health.  The school makes good provision for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development through its strong and caring ethos. Adults are positive examples as they show empathy, respect and kindness. As a result, pupils are considerate and thoughtful. They have extremely positive relationships with adults and one another.  Staff who completed the Ofsted inspection questionnaire are positive about the leadership of the new headteacher. Staff have confidence in leaders and feel well supported.  The support from the local authority has been too variable. The consultants working

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

with leaders have not provided clear judgements about the school’s performance and the quality of teaching, which has limited their influence in promoting greater improvement.  All of the parents and carers who replied to the school’s fact finding questionnaire are pleased with the school. This is reflected in the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and those who spoke to inspectors.  The school’s breakfast and after-school clubs are well led and managed. They provide a safe and nurturing environment that supports pupils’ social development.

p.4

Governance of the school

 The governing body has changed significantly since the previous inspection. Governors know that standards have not been good enough in recent years, but they have not been fully effective in evaluating the impact of the approaches used by leaders to raise pupils’ attainment. They know how the school is using the pupil premium funding to provide interventions for pupils falling behind, but do not understand how all pupils in this group benefit from the funding allocated. As a result, governors’ challenge to leaders has not been sharp enough to ensure that pupils achieve as well as they could.  Governors receive regular reports about the quality of teaching from senior leaders. However, their understanding of the quality of teaching over time and its impact on pupils’ achievement is underdeveloped. Governors are fully aware of the management of teachers’ performance and how this helps to not only reward better teaching, but

p.4

Governance of the school

also to ensure teaching is not inadequate.  The governing body monitors safeguarding effectively. It quality assures the steps taken by leaders to ensure that children are safe within the school and has a good knowledge of what this requires.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. All members of staff have up-to-date training and are checked for their suitability for working in school. Staff understand their statutory responsibilities to report concerns to the appropriate people. Any concerns about pupils’ welfare are reported and dealt with promptly.  The school sensitively identifies parents and families that may need extra support and advice. There are effective relationships with other agencies to ensure pupils are safe and their welfare needs met well. Parents and staff agree that the school keeps pupils safe.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teaching requires improvement because its impact on pupils’ achievement is not consistently good across the school. School leaders have tackled some important inadequacies in teaching successfully. Despite this, the quality of teaching is still not consistently good through the school.  Teaching does not provide tasks that offer sufficient challenge, especially for the most able. This is because some teachers’ expectations are not high enough, particularly in key stage 2.  The teaching of mathematics focuses on pupils’ calculation skills, although teachers do not ensure that pupils are confident enough to apply these skills when faced with problems. This results in pupils not gaining a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts.  The teaching of phonics is good. Pupils apply their knowledge of sounds and whole words to support their reading and writing development.  There are some strengths in quality of teaching, such as the ways it promotes

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

discussions, questioning and independence. Pupils make good progress where these strengths are evident.  Writing in current pupils’ books has improved since the start of this academic year and reflects pupils’ understanding of the features of different types of writing. Leaders have introduced high-quality texts and these have had a very beneficial impact on the quality of current pupils’ writing.  Teachers work closely and effectively with skilled teaching assistants to make sure that pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities are fully included in, and benefit from, their classroom activities.  Good teaching in the early years ensures that children get off to a good start. Activities are well planned to develop their knowledge, skills and routines. These help children to become independent and learn confidently.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. All of the parents that responded to Parent View confirmed they felt their children were happy and safe.  The pupils are friendly, polite and confident towards visitors. They are proud of their school and enjoy collaborating with each other, sharing their thoughts and opinions.  Pupils have a good understanding of the dangers of different types of bullying, including online cyber bullying. Through personal, social, health and economic education, pupils know how to stay safe in a range of situations, including when using the road and being exposed to potential hazards. Pupils also have an appreciation of e- safety and stranger danger. They apply their understanding to everyday situations as they arise.  All pupils feel valued, and equality of opportunity is clearly within the culture of the school. Pupils told inspectors that there is always someone to talk to if they ever have

p.5

Personal development and welfare

a problem.  Discussions with staff demonstrate that the school has effective links with external agencies and is very active in supporting children and families who need additional help.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good. They are proud of their school saying it is ‘fun, educational and great’. They are positive about their learning and enjoy taking on additional responsibilities. For example, the ‘play leaders’ encourage pupils to play games and respect everyone within their community.  Pupils, parents and staff believe that behaviour is good. The school’s behaviour logs show that behaviour is typically good over time.  Pupils show respect and work collaboratively with each other in lessons. They accept and embrace all the different cultures within the school.  Pupils’ attendance is lower than the national average. The impact that extended holidays have on attendance is noticeable. The leaders of the school have worked hard at reducing absences and there are signs that attendance is improving.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils’ outcomes require improvement because the progress that they make across the school is not consistently good. Pupils’ progress in 2017 from key stage 1 to the end of key stage 2 was not as good as that of other pupils nationally.  The proportion of pupils achieving the combined expected standard at the end of key stage 2 in reading, writing and mathematics remains below the national average. In Year 6, not enough pupils, particularly the most able, reached the higher standard when they left. This is because they did not receive sufficient challenge in their learning.  Outcomes in 2017 for key stage 2 pupils were partly as a result of previous weak teaching. This has been successfully identified and much remedied by the headteacher, but gaps in pupils’ learning remain. While pupils made progress, it was not enough to match that of pupils nationally. Current pupils’ books indicate that progress across key

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

stage 2 is beginning to improve.  Most pupils make good progress from their starting points in key stage 1. In 2017, pupils’ attainment was below the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of Year 2. The school’s records and inspection activities indicate that attainment is consistently improving and the attainment of current pupils is better than last year. However, the most able pupils in key stage 1 are not making the rapid progress of which they are capable.  Information kept by the school about the current pupils in Year 6 indicates that they are making better progress than in the past. The work seen during the inspection confirms this. This means that the current Year 6 pupils are better prepared for secondary school.  Pupils’ reading skills are improving. This is because of stronger phonics teaching. The results of the Year 1 phonics screening check have steadily improved and are now in

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

line with the national average. Current information on pupils’ achievement suggests this trend is set to continue.  Outcomes for disadvantaged pupils are improving; however, progress is not improving rapidly enough. In some year groups, differences are diminishing quickly. In others, they are not.  Pupils who speak English as an additional language make similar progress to other pupils as a result of targeted support provided by support staff and through well- planned class activities.  Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities receive good support from teachers and teaching assistants, which is suited to their specific needs. They currently make good progress from their individual starting points.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 Children achieve well in the Nursery and Reception classes. Teaching is good. Adults quickly and accurately assess the children’s skills and understanding when they arrive in school. The staff closely check children’s ongoing progress and adapt their planning accordingly.  Children start Nursery with skills and knowledge that are well below those typical for their age, especially in their language and communication skills. By the end of the Reception Year, the proportion that achieve a good level of development is below the national average, but it is improving. Current children make good progress which is narrowing the difference between their attainment and that of other children nationally.  The early years is well led and managed. The leader has a good understanding of how children learn and develop. There is a good balance between activities led by the teacher and those they choose themselves.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 Children enjoy positive relationships with each other and with staff. This, together with their good behaviour, indicates they feel safe.  Disadvantaged children and those who have SEN and/or disabilities make progress that is equal to, or better than, that of their classmates because adults plan for each child individually.  Parents told inspectors that they find it easy to communicate with the adults, and that their children are happy and safe. One parent said, ‘My child loves coming to school and is inspired to learn as the class atmosphere is welcoming.’

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Email address office@oakridge.bucks.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 11-12 June 2014

p.8

Information about this school

 This is a larger-than-average-sized primary school.  Most of the school population are from minority ethnic backgrounds, with the largest group being Asian or Asian British Pakistani.  The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is well above average.  The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is average.  The proportion of pupils supported by the pupil premium funding is average.  The school met the 2017 government floor standard that sets out the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress for primary schools.  The school offers a breakfast club and after-school club.  There have been considerable staff changes since the last inspection, with the appointment of a new headteacher, a seconded deputy headteacher and two new assistant headteachers. The governing body has changed considerably, with a new chair and several new members.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed learning in 35 lessons; 19 of these were joint observations with the headteacher.  The inspectors observed the school’s work. They looked at a wide range of documentation including safeguarding documents, the school’s procedures for gaining an accurate view of its own performance, and pupils’ work in books.  Discussions took place with a group of pupils, as well as informal conversations with other pupils during lessons and at playtimes. Inspectors listened to pupils read and talked to them about books they enjoy.  Meetings were held with school staff, four members of the governing body, parents and carers.  Inspectors took into account 33 responses to the online staff questionnaire and 50 responses to the online pupil questionnaire.  Inspectors considered 11 responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire, including three written comments.

p.10

Inspection team

David Harris, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Peter Dunmall Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion