Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Nov 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joyce Deere

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joyce Deere

  • Postcode verified

    NW1 1TR

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 68% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings29w0
  • What needs to improve69w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
97
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 82%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr S Gill Principal Working Men’s College 44 Crowndale Road London NW1 1TR

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff during my visit on 30 September 2008 to look at work in promoting equality in adult and community learning.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included meetings with staff, meetings with learners, observation of teaching and learning and scrutiny of documentation.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

The quality of provision to promote equality of opportunity for people from minority ethnic backgrounds is outstanding.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Working Men’s College has had consistently high success rates for all learners for the last three years across the provision. The staff take action to address any shortfalls in performance. The college successfully identified that Black African learners were significantly under-achieving on ICT courses. They found that lack of access to ICT facilities outside the classroom was a major barrier to achievement, and have been successful in achieving funding to provide improved facilities outside the teaching rooms. The achievement for this group of learners is now at the same level as other minority groups.  Managers and staff at Working Men’s College promote a culture where diversity is valued, and seen as strength and resource, rather than a barrier to learning. Teachers use the learners’ diverse cultural backgrounds as a rich source of information and an opportunity for discussion.  The college has successfully re-designed its curriculum over the past few

p.1

Features of good practice observed

years after the Principal identified that, for many local residents from minority ethnic backgrounds, including migrants with high levels of qualification in their own countries, the main barrier to success was lack of knowledge of the language.  The college has very effectively engaged with minority community groups, including migrants, as a first step to learning. The staff have put in place effective strategies for developing language through a range of curriculum settings, both in the college and in the community. The focus of the curriculum is on practical learning and activities that are relevant for learners’ lives. For example, many programmes use a practical activity as the vehicle for learning. Women are attracted to the provision through classes that affect their lives: making their own clothes, helping their children, through family literacy provision, focusing on their role as parents. The college has also taken successful action to recruit men,

p.2

Features of good practice observed

mainly from minority ethnic backgrounds, to vocational training courses and adult and community learning provision. They successfully applied for funding for accredited courses in security that attracted many men who had lived in the area for some time, but had not previously engaged with learning in Britain.

p.2

Areas for development

 A stronger focus on promoting disability equality for staff through more effective policy implementation.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop promoting equalities in adult and community learning.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local LSC and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion